Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Joby N542AJ eVTOL crash

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Joby N542AJ eVTOL crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Feb 2022, 14:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 698
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Joby N542AJ eVTOL crash

https://newatlas.com/aircraft/joby-crash-evtol/

Joby crashes one of its two eVTOL prototypes during high-speed testing

By Loz Blain
February 17, 2022

Joby has advised shareholders that it's crashed one of its prototype eVTOL aircraft while intentionally pushing the limits – flight data appears to show the S4 reaching speeds up to 270 mph, well over the S4's rated maximum of 200 mphThe crash was disclosed in an SEC Form 8-K filing – a report of unscheduled events that could be of importance to shareholders. The relevant section reads as follows:

"On February 16, 2022, Joby Aviation, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) announced that earlier today one of its remotely piloted, experimental prototype aircraft was involved in an accident during flight testing at our remote flight test base in California. There were no injuries. Safety is a core value for Joby, which is why we have been expanding our flight envelope with a remote pilot and in an uninhabited area, especially as we operate outside expected operating conditions.

Experimental flight test programs are intentionally designed to determine the limits of aircraft performance, and accidents are unfortunately a possibility. We will be supporting the relevant authorities in investigating the accident thoroughly."

While the company has yet to comment further on the incident, flight tracking data may flesh out the story a little. It seems a Joby prototype, tail number N542AJ, was performing a test flight near Schoonover Airfield, a US Army facility near Fort Hunter Liggett, southeast of Monterey.

According to the flight tracking data, the remotely-piloted aircraft seems to have been pushing way past the expected limits of its performance. At times, the tracking data shows the aircraft banking into turns at around 240 knots (270 mph, 435 km/h).

Sources within the industry tell us this would be consistent with FAA certification test procedures, which require aircraft to fly at around 1.3 times their normal "never exceed" speed.

N542AJ was one of two pre-production prototypes issued FAA Special Airworthiness Certification and US Air Force Airworthiness Approval. It's the older of the two – not the brand new one rolled out in early January this year. So assuming it's a complete write-off, it's certainly an expensive setback for Joby – but it happened way outside the expected flight envelope, it may reveal valuable information on which systems begin to fail under extreme loading, nobody was hurt and, while it'll slow down Joby's certification program, it certainly won't bring it to a complete halt.

What will this mean for the eVTOL market? Until this point, Joby has been well ahead of the pack. This is one of thousands of flight tests the company has completed while many competitors are still just getting started. Joby has already set the bar for both the longest and the fastest eVTOL flights – and indeed, the flight data here would seem to suggest that the airframe has a surprising amount of speed left in it, if the parts that failed can be improved.

So there's every chance this incident is more analogous to SpaceX's many spectacular "rapid unscheduled disassemblies" than, for example, the crashes that caused de Havilland to lose to Boeing in the fight for the early jet airliner market. Indeed, if every manufacturer has to put its certification prototypes through these high-speed tests, this may not be the last time we see this kind of crash. Time will tell.

We've reached out to Joby for further comment, but we may not hear much more until the official investigation is complete.
SansAnhedral is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2022, 11:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zulu Time Zone
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nobody was hurt because they keep flying it remotely which does not speak well of how confident they are in this pre-production airframe that is meant to be well into the certification process. I previously thought they might get certified but it wouldn’t be with the much hyped performance. I now think the project is unlikely to get certified at all this decade and will probably just quietly slip away in a year or three.
oggers is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.