Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Rocket Assisted Rotors

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Rocket Assisted Rotors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th July 2021 | 01:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 134
Likes: 38
From: Australia
Rocket Assisted Rotors


Interesting video and concept. I’m not sure I’d want a couple of hundred litres of hydrogen peroxide spinning above my head. Guess that might be why the idea never took off…
SLFMS is offline  
Reply
Old 12th July 2021 | 02:29
  #2 (permalink)  

SkyGod
100 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,624
Likes: 107
From: Palm Coast, Florida, USA
Didn’t the Rotodyne have that?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Rotodyne
TowerDog is offline  
Reply
Old 12th July 2021 | 03:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 1
From: USA
Tip Rocket, Tip Jet

The Rotordyne had rotor tip ram jet thrusters fed fuel along the blades. The Hughes H 17 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hughes_XH-17) used tip jets that were fed air from engines on the fuselage. I think the Rotordyne was the first machine to fly with ram jet tip thrusters, the second was probably the Dutch single rotor blade helicopter (!) the NHI H-3 Kolibrie (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NHI_H-3_Kolibrie) which was relatively successful and flew in the late 1950s. Seated in that picture in Wikipedia is Rene Van Der Harten, a founder of KLM Nordzee, a personal friend and one heck of a pilot. It takes lots of courage to strap yourself into a one-bladed tip jet helicopter in the 1950's!

All these machines had no torque and so no anti-torque devices. I would suppose they would fly quite similarly. They were all reportedly able to extremely efficiently turn fuel into noise.
NickLappos is offline  
Reply
Old 12th July 2021 | 04:23
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 134
Likes: 38
From: Australia
The interesting bit I found was that the rockets were only to supplement a regular engine for high power ops or to extend auto range. The idea must be redundant with turbine engines with high power to weight but still its an interesting concept. Im not sure hydrogen peroxide would be the safest in an accident or under fire….


Doesn’t the Rotordyne use the jet thrusters as the primary thrust?

Your friend certainly must have been very brave to fly a one bladed helicopter Nick, and with a new propulsion system!
SLFMS is offline  
Reply
Old 12th July 2021 | 12:53
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 13
Likes: 1
From: Ct USA
People who were around at the time told a story that a leak developed when no one was around which consumed most of the aircraft except for the resulting rusty steel. Don't know if it is true but a lot of things were tried back then that would make you shiver.
Al M is offline  
Reply
Old 12th July 2021 | 14:35
  #6 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,371
Likes: 926
From: Den Haag
Originally Posted by NickLappos
The Rotordyne had rotor tip ram jet thrusters fed fuel along the blades. The Hughes H 17 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hughes_XH-17) used tip jets that were fed air from engines on the fuselage. I think the Rotordyne was the first machine to fly with ram jet tip thrusters, the second was probably the Dutch single rotor blade helicopter (!) the NHI H-3 Kolibrie (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NHI_H-3_Kolibrie) which was relatively successful and flew in the late 1950s. Seated in that picture in Wikipedia is Rene Van Der Harten, a founder of KLM Nordzee, a personal friend and one heck of a pilot. It takes lots of courage to strap yourself into a one-bladed tip jet helicopter in the 1950's!

All these machines had no torque and so no anti-torque devices. I would suppose they would fly quite similarly. They were all reportedly able to extremely efficiently turn fuel into noise.
I'm guessing the most successful tip thrust driven aircraft was the Djinn - 178 built: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SNCASO_SO.1221_Djinn

There used to be one by the main gate at the Eurocopter factory in Marignane
212man is offline  
Reply
Old 12th July 2021 | 15:41
  #7 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Being pedantic I know, but it was, of course, the Fairey RotOdyne, not the RotoRdyne....

Even by today's standards it had a really good gross weight to basic weight ratio.
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 12th July 2021 | 19:23
  #8 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 550
Likes: 12
From: Africa
Lightbulb Thrust Drive System

Here is something more contemporary: Thrust Drive System Announcing Game Changing Helicopter Drive System

Picture

The system uses a unique and powerful propulsion technique to deliver thrust through specialized aerodynamic tubes and nozzles to provide the propulsion to power the rotor blades.

Benefits of this new technology include:
  • ELIMINATES TRANSMISSION, TAIL ROTOR, GEAR BOXES, DRIVE SHAFTS & TAIL ROTOR STRUCTURE ALONG WITH RELATED WEIGHT, COST, AND CRITICAL POINTS OF FAILURE
  • VASTLY QUIETER AND MORE EFFICIENT THAN PRIOR REACTION DRIVE HELICOPTERS
  • ADDITIONAL TIME TO LOWER COLLECTIVE PITCH DURING AUTOROTATION DUE TO THE HIGH INERTIA OF THRUST DRIVE SYSTEM
  • GREATLY ENHANCED AUTOROTATION CAPABILITY DUE TO SEPARATE DECOUPLING OF ROTORS
  • ELIMINATION OF TAIL ROTOR DANGER, BOOM STRIKE/TAIL STRIKE
  • REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION OF VORTEX RING STATE
  • COROTATING AIRFOILS QUIETER THAN CONVENTIONAL HELICOPTER
  • ABSOLUTE VERTICAL TAKEOFF AND LANDING
  • DECREASED ENGINE CABIN NOISE, VIBRATION & HEAT

Last edited by Hot and Hi; 12th July 2021 at 19:33.
Hot and Hi is offline  
Reply
Old 13th July 2021 | 02:24
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 151
From: A better place.
Originally Posted by SLFMS
https://youtu.be/zNfAD-LBjEk

Interesting video and concept. I’m not sure I’d want a couple of hundred litres of hydrogen peroxide spinning above my head. Guess that might be why the idea never took off…
JATO for rotary wing!
Fascinating...
tartare is offline  
Reply
Old 13th July 2021 | 02:43
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 134
Likes: 38
From: Australia
Originally Posted by tartare
JATO for rotary wing!
Fascinating...
That is a good way to look at it. Makes one wonder if that is where they got the idea.
SLFMS is offline  
Reply
Old 13th July 2021 | 08:27
  #11 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Originally Posted by SLFMS
That is a good way to look at it. Makes one wonder if that is where they got the idea.
Possibly from Hero’s aeolipile?
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 13th July 2021 | 11:56
  #12 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 40
Likes: 4
From: UK
See also (Hunting) Percival P.74
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percival_P.74
seer557 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.