Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Ukranian UH-1H production

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Ukranian UH-1H production

Old 26th Feb 2021, 15:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Beyond the black stump!
Posts: 1,418
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Ukranian UH-1H production

You just can't keep a good ship down!

https://ua.korrespondent.net/ukraine...iovi-vertoloty

American combat helicopters will be assembled in Odessa

TEXT: NADTOKA SVITLANA , February 26, 2021, 4:38 p.m.
00
READ THE NEWS IN RUSSIAN
444

Фото: The Aviation History Online Museum
Bell UH-1 Iroquois - American multi-role military helicopter, developed in the late 1950s

The organization of the production of Iroquois helicopters is in the final stages. The project is funded by investment funds.


State Enterprise Odessa Aircraft Plant in 2021 will begin the licensed assembly of American helicopters Bell UH-1 Iroquois (Iroquois). This was stated by the head of the concern Ukroboronprom Yuri Gusev during a visit to the company, according to Dumskaya on Friday, February 26.

According to him, the first helicopter should be assembled by the 30th anniversary of Ukraine's independence, and production will be placed in one of the shops of the aircraft plant.

"The organization of helicopter production is now in its final stages. The project is funded by investment funds," Gusev said.

In turn, the director of the aircraft plant Vitaly Yukhachev stressed that the Iroquois is a multi-purpose helicopter. It can be both transport and passenger, and in the presence of suspended weapons - shock.
_____________________________________________

The Bell UH-1 Iroquois was developed in the late 1950s. Can be equipped with two light machine guns, missiles and grenade launchers. The maximum cruising speed is 196 km / h. Flight range - 455 km. Can carry up to 14 passengers. Also available in civilian versions.

We will remind that in December, 2020 the Ministry of Defense ordered three Anto-78 planes in Antonov plant . The Armed Forces will receive three new aircraft for the delivery of personnel, weapons and light military equipment, as well as for the transportation of goods.

It was also reported that the repaired Su-24MR reconnaissance aircraft was handed over to the Armed Forces . Necessary works were carried out at aircraft repair plant in Nikolaev.
Cyclic Hotline is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2021, 19:38
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 608
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
😂 amazing. Just like Jurassic park!
Phoinix is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2021, 21:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,904
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Ok anyone can explain how this makes sense ?!
atakacs is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2021, 21:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My guess is it gives them a non Russian helicopter that they can make, maintain, and repair.
At present they have, reportedly, terrible serviceability from their fleet of Mil helicopters, given ongoing conflict with Russia.
Maybe they can re-engine the UH-1 with local engine, or get approval to make the Lycoming T53, as Ukraine has a very capable engine company (Moto Sich).
rjtjrt is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2021, 21:55
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,610
Received 133 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by atakacs
Ok anyone can explain how this makes sense ?!
Why is that hard to understand?
Cheap, low-tech, maintain/repairable, reliable and rugged. Isn't that exactly what you want in a utility helo?
Plus it gets your new domestic manufacturing ability off the ground.

Makes total sense to me.
Can't understand why more countries aren't doing this.
meleagertoo is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2021, 07:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: adra
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Suprised that production tooling and parts specific for a H-model would still be sourceable.



Unless a 'retro'1970's specification, is the objective then why not the:-



(From Wiki) Bell Huey II



A modified and re-engined UH-1H, significantly upgrading its performance, and its cost-effectiveness. Currently offered by Bell to all current military users of the type.
la grua is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2021, 12:52
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 751
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by la grua
Suprised that production tooling and parts specific for a H-model would still be sourceable.
If by "production tooling" you mean the fixtures and jigs, those can be (and are) fabricated locally. Know of a number of certified UH-1 airframe and tailboom fixtures in use today. As to the parts supply there is a good network of providers, considering there are still over 175 UH-1 model aircraft still on the US registry alone. Plus the fact there are a number of parts common to the Bell 204/205/212 model line as well. Any other one-off parts could be easily produced per the Bell licensed drawings.

On the civilian side, what will be interesting is if they expand the Ukraine/U.S. aviation bilateral agreement to include these aircraft and parts. Otherwise if they produce enough of these new versions you may see a Bell/Agusta issue if the Ukraine parts start making their way into the mainstream market.
wrench1 is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2021, 14:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Florida
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe Burisma Holdings will make some money from it?
EvaDestruction is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2021, 15:47
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Why not the UH-1N with the two engines.
N707ZS is online now  
Old 27th Feb 2021, 19:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 608
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Or even the 1980 412? No need to go jurassic era, cretaceous period will do.

Why not buy cheap chinese parts or even whole helicopters? They copied everything. I reckon they are noseing in on american butt, going all nato.
Phoinix is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2021, 21:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,069
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
How much will they be by sticker price considering cheap labor cost for final assembly and some old design and tooling that is paid off? Maybe we can all go and own some Huey soon?
I want that speaker system...
Less Hair is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2021, 00:29
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,679
Received 328 Likes on 105 Posts
Whats the ukrainian version of Fortunate son?
Beamr is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2021, 15:31
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,904
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Makes total sense to me.
Can't understand why more countries aren't doing this.
I get the "cheap / simple / proven design" part. But resurrecting a 50-old one, for which tooling is most likely not available anymore, seems rather extreme.
atakacs is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2021, 19:31
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Beyond the black stump!
Posts: 1,418
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
All parts for the UH-1H remain in production from a variety of sources, including Bell and a multitude of PMA providers. A UH-1H with composite main rotor blades, will outperform a Huey 2 at significantly less cost, and still utilize the original UH-1H drivetrain and rotor system. The airframe is simple to build, and can be done from the ground up using Bell approved fixtures, of which there are a significant number around, and you can order new ones anytime you would care to.
The T53 engine is still available new from Honeywell, and there are any number of configurations available. Comparing a UH-1H with a 412 is a little disingenuous, as the 412 is a poor performer in this role in any performance comparison with a contemporary upgraded UH-1H.
As for the dear old NH-90, just go and ask ANY of the Operators of this platform (if they have actually ever received them) just how it compares to the Bell, Sikorsky, Westland, Agusta, Leonardo, Aerospatiale, Eurocopter or Airbus platform it replaced.

Still a quite amazing development all the same!
Cyclic Hotline is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2021, 20:24
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,179
Received 377 Likes on 231 Posts
Budgets aren't infinite. Huey's have proved over decades to be a reliable and effective aircraft when reasonably well cared for and flown with a modicum of good sense. One of the nice things about a UH-1{whatever} is that there's a substantial body of "corporate knowledge" and "this is what works" information available.

I don't need a Porsche for my drive to work. Maybe the MoD in Ukraine figured out that they don't either.
It's been over three decades since I flew a Huey. I'd love to fly one again. May the UH-1 live forever.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.