UAVs to Replace Police Helicopters?
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
UAVs to Replace Police Helicopters?
From POLITICO.....
Also on Priti’s radar … is this announcement slipped out last night revealing ministers are considering using drones to replace police helicopters in England and Wales. Early trials of the Israeli Elbit Hermes 900 drone have been a success and the Home Office is determining whether police should be able to use them in the skies instead of choppers. One to ask the home secretary this morning....
Also on Priti’s radar … is this announcement slipped out last night revealing ministers are considering using drones to replace police helicopters in England and Wales. Early trials of the Israeli Elbit Hermes 900 drone have been a success and the Home Office is determining whether police should be able to use them in the skies instead of choppers. One to ask the home secretary this morning....
With the aircraft manufacturer, Elbit Industries, having also apparently solved the Holy Grail of UAS operations in Class G airspace, a "detect and avoid" capability, the flood gates could finally be opened for general use of UAS.
Last edited by TCAS FAN; 15th Sep 2020 at 10:31. Reason: technical correction
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Must agree with Riga above. In general, if the helicopter flight does not reed/require the pilot/crew then that type of flying will be UAV in the future.
Example: looking at a pipeline – UAV; actually fixing the pipeline – helicopter.
Regarding police units; how often do police pilots land their helicopter and get out and do “police stuff”. I think the answer results in increased UAV police flying in the future. An EC145 is an expensive way to just to have a look.
Example: looking at a pipeline – UAV; actually fixing the pipeline – helicopter.
Regarding police units; how often do police pilots land their helicopter and get out and do “police stuff”. I think the answer results in increased UAV police flying in the future. An EC145 is an expensive way to just to have a look.
An EC145 is an expensive way to just to have a look.
In 6 years of police flying, I landed the chopper once to grab some juvenile escapees from a prison farm, who had stolen an RX-7 and had ended up in a semi-rural dead end street. Landed on the street to block their exit, the observer (who was a real cop) detained them until ground support arrived to do the actual arrest.
The reason for a certified "detect and avoid" system is that the UAS can detect and avoid conflicting traffic/bird concentrations/parachutists/ para gliders etc, just as if it was being navigated visually. If it can do that in Class G airspace, Class D presents no problem for UAS to be operated in accordance with VFR, albeit it will be able to do it more efficiently than the MK1 eyeball of a manned aircraft pilot. The UAS is controlled by a Remote Pilot who communicates with ATC on the appropriate RTF frequency to obtain CAS entry clearance.
So, all they will need to do is have not quite enough UAVs in not quite the required locations with not quite the needed response time and they will have replaced NPAS completely
An EC145 is an expensive way to just to have a look.
By the way, police nowadays tend to use the H145 with fenestron.
Not in UK they don’t. Mainly EC135P/T2+ and some BK-117 C2
This has been debated over and over. Go see NPAS forums etc.
On first glance, it might look tremendously cheaper than "real" chopper. But, please, has someone made a realistic calculation of the cost and compare it with the capability of such UAS system? There still needs to be quite a number of people on the ground, to operate and maintain it, there are operational limitations (can someone explain further how to operate in controlled airspace which is plenty in UK?) I seriously doubt this (or any comparable) UAS will last thousands and thousands of hours, so please include realistic lifespan in calculation too.
Am sure UAS will come in bigger numbers (Canada RCMP "mounties" operate by far the largest police UAS fleet, not to mention Turkish police, that runs serious UAS outfits, albeit in a way that might not work in EU airspace/legislative standards...) but are not (yet) a direct replacement for manned police aircraft.
On first glance, it might look tremendously cheaper than "real" chopper. But, please, has someone made a realistic calculation of the cost and compare it with the capability of such UAS system? There still needs to be quite a number of people on the ground, to operate and maintain it, there are operational limitations (can someone explain further how to operate in controlled airspace which is plenty in UK?) I seriously doubt this (or any comparable) UAS will last thousands and thousands of hours, so please include realistic lifespan in calculation too.
Am sure UAS will come in bigger numbers (Canada RCMP "mounties" operate by far the largest police UAS fleet, not to mention Turkish police, that runs serious UAS outfits, albeit in a way that might not work in EU airspace/legislative standards...) but are not (yet) a direct replacement for manned police aircraft.
Another "benefit" of a UAV, is that the politicians can't use it as a taxi. Some years ago I knew some folks at the police aviation unit for a major US city that were well overdue for helo upgrade, but they deliberately stuck with their clapped out twin seater, because they knew that if they upgraded to a nice multi seat turbine, the Mayor would summon it as their personal taxi to jaunt off to the capital.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A cautionary tale about mixing airborne law enforcement resources:
UAV / Helicopter Midair Collision
UAV / Helicopter Midair Collision
A cautionary tale about mixing airborne law enforcement resources:
UAV / Helicopter Midair Collision
UAV / Helicopter Midair Collision
As I have already stated the current Holy Grail is a "detect and avoid" system which enables the UAS (or RPAS as it may referred to, "UAV" is an obsolete term) to detect a confliction and then avoids it. Note the UAS takes the avoiding action to resolve the confliction.
There is no way that a 2.4 KG RPAS is equipped with anything resembling a detect and avoid system. It relies on the Remote Pilot to keep it within visual line of sight (VLOS) so that traffic conflictions can be resolved.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The subject report refers to a 2.4 KG RPAS (drone), something akin to what you'd buy online or at Curry PC World. It bears no relationship to the Hermes 900 that is referred to in this thread.
As I have already stated the current Holy Grail is a "detect and avoid" system which enables the UAS (or RPAS as it may referred to, "UAV" is an obsolete term) to detect a confliction and then avoids it. Note the UAS takes the avoiding action to resolve the confliction.
There is no way that a 2.4 KG RPAS is equipped with anything resembling a detect and avoid system. It relies on the Remote Pilot to keep it within visual line of sight (VLOS) so that traffic conflictions can be resolved.
As I have already stated the current Holy Grail is a "detect and avoid" system which enables the UAS (or RPAS as it may referred to, "UAV" is an obsolete term) to detect a confliction and then avoids it. Note the UAS takes the avoiding action to resolve the confliction.
There is no way that a 2.4 KG RPAS is equipped with anything resembling a detect and avoid system. It relies on the Remote Pilot to keep it within visual line of sight (VLOS) so that traffic conflictions can be resolved.
My only intention of highlighting the Canadian accident was the mixing of technologies, both novel and established - nothing more, nothing less.
If the UAS / RPAS that are used in the UK are sufficiently advanced that midair collisions are guaranteed to be avoided then this is certainly reassuring and a development that is to be applauded.
With the aircraft manufacturer, Elbit Industries, having also apparently solved the Holy Grail of UAS operations in Class G airspace, a "detect and avoid" capability
Would be interesting to see the public's reaction to constant surveillance by drones - sorry UAS - it's one thing having a copper looking into your back garden but quite another to have an anonymous sensor with data going to who knows where overhead so much of the time. That is what the LE stands for in MALE isn't it? Long Endurance?