Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Is Bell testing a multi-fenestron?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Is Bell testing a multi-fenestron?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 00:21
  #61 (permalink)  
CTR
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperF
So for operations such as Fire fighting, Utility, construction, Agricultural, lifting, logging, SAR if lots of winching, etc a conventional TR would probably be better??
Correct. That is also why you don’t see helicopters with Fenstroms and Notars being used for these missions.

No solution fits every mission.
CTR is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 00:32
  #62 (permalink)  
CTR
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by MLH
I suspect that a flat pitched conventional TR in cruise does not pull much power.
It matters what you consider “much”. Adding in the open tail rotor additional drag, I wouldn’t be surprised at 30+ HP. A 407 tail rotor consumes about 70 HP in cruise.
CTR is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.