Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Hill Helicopters HX50

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Hill Helicopters HX50

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th May 2026 | 16:45
  #3101 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 239
Likes: 50
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by Winemaker
Wasn't the motor/generator unit scheduled to run this month? I've lost track......
Yes, they're a month behind their previous estimate, as I said. Hopefully runs in June. Then they have to do the free turbine unit and test it once they've nailed down the testing of the starter-generator, and they also have to do the transmission and flight controls, although that can be easily tested without the engine using an electric motor, but I don't think they've done it yet.
CGameProgrammerr is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2026 | 17:17
  #3102 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 386
From: Brantisvogan
Originally Posted by Winemaker
Wasn't the motor/generator unit scheduled to run this month? I've lost track......
But it is running…
Late
Bell_ringer is online now  
Reply
Old 19th May 2026 | 18:18
  #3103 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 369
Likes: 77
From: SE of there
Originally Posted by CGameProgrammerr
Yes, they're a month behind their previous estimate, as I said. Hopefully runs in June. Then they have to do the free turbine unit and test it once they've nailed down the testing of the starter-generator, and they also have to do the transmission and flight controls, although that can be easily tested without the engine using an electric motor, but I don't think they've done it yet.
I wonder why?
admikar is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2026 | 00:22
  #3104 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 16
Likes: 14
From: FL
Originally poster by 206 Jock

Yep, he just has to do everything before he runs out of money.


His engineering - led presentation leads people to believe that the finish is in sight. Reality is very much different.

A quick glance through the answers to FAQs on his website is interesting. He reckons his GT50 will cost 50k USD per unit. This compares with existing models at 500k. That is dangerous logic. If you weigh in your typical car, it contains about 300 USD of materials, but that's not what it costs!

206 Jock…Where did you ever get the figure 50K USD? Totally fake information.
VerticalPilot is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2026 | 08:01
  #3105 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 438
Likes: 2
From: Derby
From their FAQs:
We determined early in the program that using an existing engine was not a viable option due to cost. The list price of a standard 500hp gas turbine engine is approximately $500,000. In contrast, our proprietary GT50 engine costs less than 10% of that figure to manufacture.
Robbo Jock is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2026 | 08:17
  #3106 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 16
Likes: 1
From: ireland
good to see the GT50 is 99.5% finished, all he needs to do is assemble it together and fire it up. What could possibly go wrong!!
neo_2022 is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2026 | 10:45
  #3107 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
I wonder what the list price of the GT50 is going to be - he claims less than $50K to manufacture it but then compares that to the list price for one off the shelf from other manufacturers - a bit of deliberate apples and oranges going on there...
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2026 | 11:55
  #3108 (permalink)  
JDJ
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 54
Likes: 2
From: Lampeter
Originally Posted by [email protected]
I wonder what the list price of the GT50 is going to be - he claims less than $50K to manufacture it but then compares that to the list price for one off the shelf from other manufacturers - a bit of deliberate apples and oranges going on there...
No, he’s simply saying he didn’t want to pay that much to use an existing engine.

JDJ is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2026 | 12:37
  #3109 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 603
Likes: 65
From: South of UK
Originally Posted by VerticalPilot
Originally poster by 206 Jock

206 Jock…Where did you ever get the figure 50K USD? Totally fake information.
Ah ok And it will definitely last 5000 hours straight out of the box too.

Deluded.
206 jock is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2026 | 15:09
  #3110 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 386
From: Brantisvogan
Originally Posted by JDJ
No, he’s simply saying he didn’t want to pay that much to use an existing engine.
Do the math on what he has spent developing said engine (so far). What he has spent buying and manufacturing the tooling required.
We have seen how much cash he has been burning.
It is somewhat convenient to exclude all of that time, effort and R&D from the cost calculation and then compare it to an engine where those costs aren't just included, but also have gone through the extensive work to certify it.

You would need to be incredibly naive to take all the superficial marketing speak that Hill regurgitates at face value.
Bell_ringer is online now  
Reply
Old 20th May 2026 | 17:40
  #3111 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,371
Likes: 926
From: Den Haag
Originally Posted by 206 jock
Ah ok And it will definitely last 5000 hours straight out of the box too.

Deluded.
Even the RR C250-20 is only 3,500 hours after a gazillion hours in service!
212man is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2026 | 18:20
  #3112 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 603
Likes: 65
From: South of UK
Originally Posted by 212man
Even the RR C250-20 is only 3,500 hours after a gazillion hours in service!
Yeah but the RR isn't powered by JHWTKA*.

As I mentioned there are a number of answers to FAQs that piqued my interest. I flagged one about the 5000 hours that resulted in a mysterious change a couple of days later.

Here's another. On a question about price....

"As we continue to go through development, we will always adjust the aircraft’s price. As we go into production and beyond we will be adjusting the price for inflation. As we approach production, we will also be increasing the base price to reflect market conditions and the value proposition that we offer." So that's clear. To someone Probably.. Let's see if this gets changed.

But if I had a signed contract, I would be triple checking the Ts and C's!

*Jason Hill Wishful Thinking Kool Aid
206 jock is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2026 | 21:20
  #3113 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 977
Likes: 705
From: Yakima
If Hill can build a 5000 hour 500 h.p. turbine engine for $50k he should just forget the helicopter part and produce engines....
Winemaker is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2026 | 21:32
  #3114 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 57
From: UK
Originally Posted by Winemaker
If Hill can build a 5000 hour 500 h.p. turbine engine for $50k he should just forget the helicopter part and produce engines....
I wonder if that comment isn’t closer to the mark than you think. After all the UK is concerned that all current small turbines that would power the large number of drones supposedly needed are not domestically built…
Pittsextra is online now  
Reply
Old 20th May 2026 | 23:39
  #3115 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Aviation Qualifications: A&P
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 270
From: USA
Originally Posted by Winemaker
If Hill can build a 5000 hour 500 h.p. turbine engine for $50k he should just forget the helicopter part and produce engines....
With all the new turbine development going on at the legacy engine OEMs for the hybrid electrical propulsion market, the GT50 would definitely fit into that market given its simplified design and lower weight.
wrench1 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th May 2026 | 08:58
  #3116 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 386
From: Brantisvogan
Latest news articles from the Hill site:

https://www.hillhelicopters.com/blog...y-for-assembly (previously discussed from the youtoob video).


A humble and balanced piece on the Hill story
https://www.hillhelicopters.com/blog...the-hill-story
Bell_ringer is online now  
Reply
Old 29th May 2026 | 21:41
  #3117 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 880
Likes: 225
From: Australia
Originally Posted by Bell_ringer
...A humble and balanced piece on the Hill story
https://www.hillhelicopters.com/blog...the-hill-story
I admire Jason's ambition and determination.

Given the theme of many posts on this thread, was interesting to read part of the second link:

Hill Helicopters has "no bank debt, no venture capital, and is further supported by Innovate UK grant funding. That financial independence has allowed Hill to prioritise engineering decisions over investor timelines, a rarity in modern aerospace".

Depositors are in some respects investors. So hopefully they remain patient and the funds stretch through and beyond the development period.
helispotter is offline  
Reply
Old 29th May 2026 | 22:13
  #3118 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 239
Likes: 50
From: San Diego, CA
Except that deposits are non-refundable, so the funding is secure.
CGameProgrammerr is offline  
Reply
Old 30th May 2026 | 15:22
  #3119 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 16
Likes: 14
From: FL
As Hill rounds the corner (few more weeks) and into aviation history; the GT50 light turbine is on track to fire up; it’s also historic for his use of Vertical intergration building in low cost of mfg not to forget the only small turbine built in the UK. An astute mind can see an investment of UK funded grants towards Jason’ R&D expenditures is about to pay huge dividends in military applications..
VerticalPilot is offline  
Reply
Old 30th May 2026 | 20:28
  #3120 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 386
From: Brantisvogan
Originally Posted by VerticalPilot
As Hill rounds the corner (few more weeks) and into aviation history; the GT50 light turbine is on track to fire up; it’s also historic for his use of Vertical intergration building in low cost of mfg not to forget the only small turbine built in the UK. An astute mind can see an investment of UK funded grants towards Jason’ R&D expenditures is about to pay huge dividends in military applications..
Rounds the corner? He can’t even see the corner.
No military will be spending money on this dream. Rotorcraft are very last decade and his vision is unlikely to meet any of their requirements.
Bell_ringer is online now  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.