Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Heli down

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th December 2019 | 00:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Heli down

bumma about Fire heli down Nth Syd today, single pilot ok I believe....phew!
machtuk is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2019 | 05:44
  #2 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 588
Likes: 99
From: Australia
Cloudee is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2019 | 07:27
  #3 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
The information in that second link states that the aircraft is not fitted with a propellor.

The photo confirms that.....

Glad the pilot is OK.
ShyTorque is online now  
Reply
Old 7th December 2019 | 10:16
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 118
Getting old now and eyesight going, but where the fcuk is the main rotor system ?
Hughes500 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2019 | 10:20
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 71
From: Wanaka, NZ
You can see the 48 ft diameter arc where a main rotor blade has hit the ground, after which the whole shooting match was ripped off the roof and exited the scene.
gulliBell is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2019 | 14:52
  #6 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 51
Likes: 1
From: USA
Has the T/R on the right so Bell 205A1. Beautiful machine, glad to see Pilot is okay.

Last edited by hookes_joint; 9th December 2019 at 01:25.
hookes_joint is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2019 | 21:50
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 90
From: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Has the T/R on the left so Bell 205A1.
Nope. UH-1H with the TR on the RH side. Dyncorp mod for UH1.

UH-1H and 205A were all on the LH side. A1 had 212 TR on the RH side.

This is definitely a UH-1H.
RVDT is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2019 | 22:07
  #8 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 21
From: Beyond the black stump!
https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/231190

Ex OAS/Dyncorp converted UH-1H.
Cyclic Hotline is offline  
Reply
Old 8th December 2019 | 01:05
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,562
Likes: 952
From: Aus
Airborne shot on the news last night, main rotor lying in the grass some distance forward of the aircraft.
megan is offline  
Reply
Old 8th December 2019 | 02:20
  #10 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 51
Likes: 1
From: USA
What engine has this UH1H? I heard from an engineer Dyncorp put a PT6 in a few when he worked there.

The 205A1++ I spent this summer in was a HeliTrades STC had the t/r on the same side as this one, strakes, fast fin, -17 motor etc

hookes_joint is offline  
Reply
Old 8th December 2019 | 22:44
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 175
Likes: 2
From: US
Temsco is actually the STC holder for the - 67 PT6 engine installation in the H model Huey. They have done a huge amount of engineering over the years. I believe they started with the work DynCorp did and bought the STC and continued to refine the design. It is designed for the H model Huey and is installed along with the Helitrade STC ( i think that STC is now owned by Hillsborough Aviation) that puts the 212 main and tail rotor systems on the UH1-H, thus the right side tail rotor on the Huey. The 205A-1 could use the Helitrade STC and also be converted to what people call the 205A1+++. The +++ thing is an industry buzz word to describe the mods done to a 205A1, which is what the aircraft remains. The 205B came new with the 212 main rotor and 212 RH side tail rotor. We have no idea which variant the aircraft the subject of this thread actually is.

In the US the Helitrade STC for the 212 main rotor and tail rotor is not applicable to restricted category UH-1H aircraft. The only converted Hueys are the ones owned and operated by public agencies like Customs and Border Patrol and CAL FIRE ( and some other California fire agencies). Those aircraft, of course are not type certificated and can only be used by public operators. Im not sure how Temsco worked that into part of their engine conversion STC. Of course it might be a Bell 210 of which I think about 4 were built and two or 3 might still be flying but that is unlikley as I believe the only 210 operator is in the US. I suspect there are some pilots who think they've flown one variant but are misled by what someone calls it. The Huey family tree is not an easy one to follow.
.
roscoe1 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th December 2019 | 23:33
  #12 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 518
Likes: 50
From: London/Atlanta
Originally Posted by roscoe1
Temsco is actually the STC holder for the - 67 PT6 engine installation in the H model Huey. They have done a huge amount of engineering over the years. I believe they started with the work DynCorp did and bought the STC and continued to refine the design. It is designed for the H model Huey and is installed along with the Helitrade STC ( i think that STC is now owned by Hillsborough Aviation) that puts the 212 main and tail rotor systems on the UH1-H, thus the right side tail rotor on the Huey. The 205A-1 could use the Helitrade STC and also be converted to what people call the 205A1+++. The +++ thing is an industry buzz word to describe the mods done to a 205A1, which is what the aircraft remains. The 205B came new with the 212 main rotor and 212 RH side tail rotor. We have no idea which variant the aircraft the subject of this thread actually is.

In the US the Helitrade STC for the 212 main rotor and tail rotor is not applicable to restricted category UH-1H aircraft. The only converted Hueys are the ones owned and operated by public agencies like Customs and Border Patrol and CAL FIRE ( and some other California fire agencies). Those aircraft, of course are not type certificated and can only be used by public operators. Im not sure how Temsco worked that into part of their engine conversion STC. Of course it might be a Bell 210 of which I think about 4 were built and two or 3 might still be flying but that is unlikley as I believe the only 210 operator is in the US. I suspect there are some pilots who think they've flown one variant but are misled by what someone calls it. The Huey family tree is not an easy one to follow.
.
Roscoe1,

Purely as a matter of interest how old might these helicopters be and how recent might the engine conversions be?
nomorehelosforme is offline  
Reply
Old 9th December 2019 | 14:58
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 56
From: Anglia
Irrespective of age, the Huey Frames and Systems are tough, resilient and quite forgiving. All the transmissions and their support structures are also tough and forgiving, except when something the size of Earth gets in the way. try not to overthink this incident. It's not at all about the stresses found in this specialist operation.
Rigga is offline  
Reply
Old 9th December 2019 | 15:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 175
Likes: 2
From: US
Originally Posted by nomorehelosforme


Roscoe1,

Purely as a matter of interest how old might these helicopters be and how recent might the engine conversions be?
After a bit more poking around it appears that Temsco may have sold the STC to a company called Trinity Aviation Group in British Columbia. As far as I know the Temsco prototype is the only one they built up and that was about 8 or 10 years ago. The Trinity web site is a bit strange as there is not much information on it and you can't find out too much about the company ( at least I haven't been able to). As with many older helicopter platforms, when aftermarket things have been getting made for years, there are many players involved. Some are well known and some are not. Some are producing and some are no longer. Stcs get bought and sold.
roscoe1 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.