RAF go from Dambusters to Dam builders
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 518
Likes: 50
From: London/Atlanta
RAF go from Dambusters to Dam builders
This is not the first time the RAF have been called in recently to assist with flood problems.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-derbyshire-49199505
Emergency crews are racing to save a damaged reservoir, as "terrified" residents fear their Derbyshire town could be flooded.
Water is being pumped out of the 300-million-gallon Toddbrook Reservoir and an RAF helicopter is dropping 400 tonnes of aggregate around it.
Part of the dam wall collapsed on Thursday afternoon
My concern is how will 400 tonnes of ballast hold 300 million gallons of water!!!!
Better pictures and video here.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rvoir-dam.html
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-derbyshire-49199505
Emergency crews are racing to save a damaged reservoir, as "terrified" residents fear their Derbyshire town could be flooded.
Water is being pumped out of the 300-million-gallon Toddbrook Reservoir and an RAF helicopter is dropping 400 tonnes of aggregate around it.
Part of the dam wall collapsed on Thursday afternoon
My concern is how will 400 tonnes of ballast hold 300 million gallons of water!!!!
Better pictures and video here.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rvoir-dam.html
Last edited by nomorehelosforme; 2nd August 2019 at 12:04.
Joined: Apr 2008
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 611
Likes: 249
From: on the ground
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 38
From: East Sussex
From what I read they dropped 400 tonnes of aggregate upstream of the dam to divert water from entering the reservoir and other watercourses.
Now they are reinforcing the dam wall.
When I was on Mark 2 Chinooks 15 years ago I lifted iso-containers and troops but didn't get to do anything like this!
Now they are reinforcing the dam wall.
When I was on Mark 2 Chinooks 15 years ago I lifted iso-containers and troops but didn't get to do anything like this!
Paxing All Over The World
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,841
Likes: 328
From: Hertfordshire, UK.
This BBC page has a good 1 minute video clip of them postioining and dropping from short lines. I like the careful adjustment after each bag goes down. Also BBC second video.
Reporting that the dam level has been reduced by 2m, which is a heck of a lot.
Reporting that the dam level has been reduced by 2m, which is a heck of a lot.
Last edited by PAXboy; 2nd August 2019 at 18:21.
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
Reporting that the dam level has been reduced by 2m, which is a heck of a lot.
Nomore helos - the weight of the water on one side needs to be balanced by the weight of the dam on the other, they have simply put more weight on the dam wall where it had previously lost integrity.
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 497
Likes: 31
From: A very long way North
Having watched the video of the Chinook, one of those random questions just popped into mind.
Seeing it drop 6 individual bags of aggregate at a time, very carefully and precisely, would it be quicker and/or cheaper to do it with say 6 Jetrangers or 350s (other types are available!), going round and round in a circuit taking one bag each at a time? I’m thinking of the high speed commercial lifting operations that you see with Christmas trees/rocks for dry stone walls, that sort of thing.
I have no idea how much a Chinook or a Jetranger costs, how much those bags weigh or if they could even be lifted by such aircraft.
And definitely no criticism at all of the job the Chinny is doing, just idle meanderings of the mind while walking the dog.
Seeing it drop 6 individual bags of aggregate at a time, very carefully and precisely, would it be quicker and/or cheaper to do it with say 6 Jetrangers or 350s (other types are available!), going round and round in a circuit taking one bag each at a time? I’m thinking of the high speed commercial lifting operations that you see with Christmas trees/rocks for dry stone walls, that sort of thing.
I have no idea how much a Chinook or a Jetranger costs, how much those bags weigh or if they could even be lifted by such aircraft.
And definitely no criticism at all of the job the Chinny is doing, just idle meanderings of the mind while walking the dog.
Paxing All Over The World
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,841
Likes: 328
From: Hertfordshire, UK.
One possibility of why the Chinook/s were used is they are:
- Available immediately
- Highy experienced crew
- An excellent training exercise
- Effectively (for the local water authority) free. We may expect the Govt not to chargeback for it as it would be very bad politics {at any time} to have a dam fail when the Chinook and it's crew were available.
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 518
Likes: 50
From: London/Atlanta
Originally Posted by [email protected]
when you see the capability of the high volume pumps they use - and you can see a few of them in the news pictures, they are about half-iso sized boxes - then 2m is quite understandable.
Nomore helos - the weight of the water on one side needs to be balanced by the weight of the dam on the other, they have simply put more weight on the dam wall where it had previously lost integrity.
Nomore helos - the weight of the water on one side needs to be balanced by the weight of the dam on the other, they have simply put more weight on the dam wall where it had previously lost integrity.
Crab, I started looking at the mathematics of this and gave up! That aside, some good pictures and videos on the Daily Mail
Joined: Apr 2008
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 611
Likes: 249
From: on the ground
Think in terms of pressure, not weight. The extent of the reservoir behind the dam wall doesn't affect the load on the wall at all; it could go back a hundred miles or it could be a narrow canal between two parallel dam walls, but the pressure at the surface of the dam depends only on the depth, and the force on the wall is the integral of pressure x area over the immersed surface.
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 518
Likes: 50
From: London/Atlanta
Nearly 19 years ago, we were doing very similar jobs with the Chinook. Remember, the answer is 2 Chinooks, what’s the question?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...se-622283.html
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 38
From: East Sussex
Nearly 19 years ago, we were doing very similar jobs with the Chinook. Remember, the answer is 2 Chinooks, what’s the question?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...se-622283.html
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 118
Plastic
AS 350 B3 will pick up a tonne ( 1000kg ) bag of ballast. It would be way quicker and cheaper than the RAF. To be fair RAF pilots are not really trained to do repeat lifting like this hours at a time. Would be better on a long line. Normal lift cycle for us would be 1nm a minute including hooking up the load and placing within a ft of the required location.
Last time I saw a quote for a Chinnok it was £ 20k an hour, As350 is around £ 1k an hour plus ground crew and pilot
We attended the fires last year in Derbyshire, we arrived within 6 hours of being called out, took the military over 2 days to turn up. So would suggest that a civilian operator would be more on call, with better equipment and much more experience
AS 350 B3 will pick up a tonne ( 1000kg ) bag of ballast. It would be way quicker and cheaper than the RAF. To be fair RAF pilots are not really trained to do repeat lifting like this hours at a time. Would be better on a long line. Normal lift cycle for us would be 1nm a minute including hooking up the load and placing within a ft of the required location.
Last time I saw a quote for a Chinnok it was £ 20k an hour, As350 is around £ 1k an hour plus ground crew and pilot
We attended the fires last year in Derbyshire, we arrived within 6 hours of being called out, took the military over 2 days to turn up. So would suggest that a civilian operator would be more on call, with better equipment and much more experience
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Exactly how many aircraft can you provide?
One small bird is not going to out lift the Chinook in the long run unless the haul is very short and the hook up time for the Chinook is slow.
This lifting by the Chinook is not exactly precision lifting but something any reasonably capable pilot can accomplish.
The Longline pilot does it all by himself....while the Military Chinook crew uses a crew member and pilot working together to get the load into the correct position.
I feel you under state the ability of the RAF Chinook crews to do a days work.....though with all of the HSE requirements, planning, briefing, and related administrative hurtles....it would take them a while to actually get to work as compared to the civil operator.
You have a point about using long lines....but then the military (RAF and US Army for sure) do not embrace that technique as a normal role or operational skill.
The military always seems to have a longer lead time and shows up with far larger a support crew than does a comparable civilian operator....been there and did that on both sides of the equation.
One small bird is not going to out lift the Chinook in the long run unless the haul is very short and the hook up time for the Chinook is slow.
This lifting by the Chinook is not exactly precision lifting but something any reasonably capable pilot can accomplish.
The Longline pilot does it all by himself....while the Military Chinook crew uses a crew member and pilot working together to get the load into the correct position.
I feel you under state the ability of the RAF Chinook crews to do a days work.....though with all of the HSE requirements, planning, briefing, and related administrative hurtles....it would take them a while to actually get to work as compared to the civil operator.
You have a point about using long lines....but then the military (RAF and US Army for sure) do not embrace that technique as a normal role or operational skill.
The military always seems to have a longer lead time and shows up with far larger a support crew than does a comparable civilian operator....been there and did that on both sides of the equation.
Last edited by SASless; 4th August 2019 at 12:23.
Paxing All Over The World
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,841
Likes: 328
From: Hertfordshire, UK.
The time to call the military is all about red tape and paperwork. But, as I said, I strongly suspect that the real cost of this will not be passed on as it is a great training exercise. The politicians will also see it as PR. So the cost is, effectively, greatly reduced.
You can also see just how much they have lowered the level, remarkable. BBC
In one report about the residents who refuse to leave their homes prattle the classic "Health and Safety gone mad" It would be interesting to know what he would/will say if his house was swept away and his family with it ...
The Canal and River Trust estimated on Saturday that 105,000 cubic metres (23 million gallons) of water had been pumped out in 12 hours.An RAF Chinook helicopter put 400 tonnes of sandbags on the affected part of the dam on Friday - adding a further 70 on Saturday.
In one report about the residents who refuse to leave their homes prattle the classic "Health and Safety gone mad" It would be interesting to know what he would/will say if his house was swept away and his family with it ...
Avoid imitations
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
There's some poor information being posted about what RAF helicopter pilots are trained, or not, to do with underslung loads..
Load lifting on a 100 foot strop certainly wasn't uncommon in my time - it was often an essential tool, such as when the army put loads next to tall trees, instead of out in the open, to avoid giving away their position.
Not trained for repeat load lifting...? I assume you have never seen an army Brigade lift.
Load lifting on a 100 foot strop certainly wasn't uncommon in my time - it was often an essential tool, such as when the army put loads next to tall trees, instead of out in the open, to avoid giving away their position.
Not trained for repeat load lifting...? I assume you have never seen an army Brigade lift.
Avoid imitations
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
I overheard an interesting conversation last night in a restaurant (I admit I cannot verify what was said so it's definitely rumour only).The gist of it was that dams like this were built with side spill outlets controlled by valves. These are meant to be used to control the maximum water level, to prevent over-topping of the wall but unfortunately these valves could no longer be opened at this dam, because the mechanism has rusted solid over many years.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 59
From: UK
I overheard an interesting conversation last night in a restaurant (I admit I cannot verify what was said so it's definitely rumour only).The gist of it was that dams like this were built with side spill outlets controlled by valves. These are meant to be used to control the maximum water level, to prevent over-topping of the wall but unfortunately these valves could no longer be opened at this dam, because the mechanism has rusted solid over many years.
Somewhere I have a photo of Laggan Dam (adjacent to the A86 Spean Bridge - Kingussie road) in full spate, the amount of water being released is astonishing. The mist of spray it created could be seen from several miles away. Standing next to it was truly awesome.
What I am curious about is where the bags being lifted are coming from.