Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Bell 280 hits 322 MPH

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Bell 280 hits 322 MPH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th January 2019 | 13:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Bell 280 hits 322 MPH

Now this is interesting.....things are speeding up out there!


https://breakingdefense.com/2019/01/...WeZnXe_C34D7n8


SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 25th January 2019 | 13:41
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 95
From: Geneva, Switzerland
I believe the V22 can do 275... Not saying it isn't a nice achievement but not groundbreaking
atakacs is offline  
Reply
Old 25th January 2019 | 16:38
  #3 (permalink)  
CTR
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 300
Likes: 42
From: Texas
Relative to Competition

Originally Posted by atakacs
I believe the V22 can do 275... Not saying it isn't a nice achievement but not groundbreaking
Relative to the achievements chalked off by the FVL competition, this is groundbreaking. Consider how long from first flight to max speed it took for the V-22. Not to mention that after four years the Raider still has not achieved its promised much lower max speed.

The Sikorsky and Boeing engineering team are currently busting their butts getting the Defiant to First Flight. And they have my respect. But they more than anyone else the SB>1 probably respect and recognize the groundbreaking FVL schedule achievements of Bell. The little guy in the FVL competition with Goliaths.
CTR is offline  
Reply
Old 25th January 2019 | 21:30
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 95
From: Geneva, Switzerland
Oh ok it isn't the actual speed achieved but the time it took to get there in the program. Understood.
atakacs is offline  
Reply
Old 26th January 2019 | 08:35
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 724
Likes: 41
From: Arlington, Tx. US
Ata

Your missing the point. The 280 is an improved tiktrotor design with increased agility and fixed engines with all of associated benefits (minimizing surface heating, improved firing arcs, simpler engines, etc...).. Itt was never meant to be significantly faster than the V-22, but was meant to have significantly better hot/high performance. The time to max speed is only relevant with respect to showing the maturity of the technology and technical prowess of the developing organization.

The 280 program has done what it needed to do. It has already demonstrated superior performance and lower technical risk as compared to the SB-1.
The Sultan is offline  
Reply
Old 26th January 2019 | 12:36
  #6 (permalink)  
CTR
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 300
Likes: 42
From: Texas
Long List of Achievements

The list of V-280 achievements go on to include major reductions manufacturing and maintenance costs. Not just promises, but validated by applications of similar technology on Bell commercial products.

In my opinion however the most amazing V-280 achievement was meeting a very aggressive customer program schedule that few in the industry thought possible. Not even the “Dream Team” comprised of the two largest defense contractors in the world came close to what Bell achieved in 5 years.



CTR is offline  
Reply
Old 26th January 2019 | 17:42
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 165
From: Hobe Sound, Florida
Sultan, I’m curious as to the cruise tip speed?

Last edited by JohnDixson; 27th January 2019 at 10:44.
JohnDixson is online now  
Reply
Old 27th January 2019 | 01:36
  #8 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 209
Likes: 12
From: Underneath the Radar
I think we will see the V-280 as the winner of this program. Higher speed, longer range and list risk. Well done Bell.

Wonder what the military designation will be? UH-65? MV-25?
rrekn is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2019 | 19:46
  #9 (permalink)  
CTR
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 300
Likes: 42
From: Texas
Originally Posted by SansAnhedral
I think they are a pretty good ways away from top speed still - a few friends tell me more than 280 kt was achieved and that was still without the full set of gear doors installed.

Maybe they should dispense with gear doors like on the 737 and other aircraft. Sometimes they are more problems than they are worth.
CTR is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2019 | 21:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 62
Likes: 1
From: Stagnation Point
Wink

Originally Posted by CTR



Maybe they should dispense with gear doors like on the 737 and other aircraft. Sometimes they are more problems than they are worth.
That's exactly what was done with the CH-53K nose gear doors. Fewer parts, higher reliability, lower weight. Higher drag? Meh!
Droop Snoot is offline  
Reply
Old 29th January 2019 | 05:03
  #11 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 724
Likes: 41
From: Arlington, Tx. US
V-280 to Pause

So it appears the V-280 program will finish its demo effort before the SB-1 even flies:

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...compet-455337/

How embarrassing for Sikorsky-Boeing, especially when it was Sikorsky who blocked Bell’s request to slip the original demo schedule.

The Sultan is offline  
Reply
Old 29th January 2019 | 23:56
  #12 (permalink)  
CTR
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 300
Likes: 42
From: Texas
Originally Posted by SansAnhedral
They corrected me actually, its not the doors themselves but an actuator supplier who cant seem to get their act together.

I think you would want full doors at those speeds to prevent buffet vibration getting to various components.

A 737 flys a lot faster than 280 Kts and does not require separate actuated doors over the wheels. You just design it properly to minimize buffeting.
CTR is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2019 | 22:29
  #13 (permalink)  
CTR
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 300
Likes: 42
From: Texas
300 Kts Sans Doors Sansanhedral :-)

Perhaps the added drag from not having doors is not the negative the aero guys thought? So for production the V-280 can dispense with actuated doors and save cost, weight, and improve reliability.

FYI. The reused Cessna Citation gear used on the V-280 also did not have actuated doors.
CTR is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2019 | 01:29
  #14 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 258
Likes: 58
From: USA
Originally Posted by CTR
In my opinion however the most amazing V-280 achievement was meeting a very aggressive customer program schedule that few in the industry thought possible. Not even the “Dream Team” comprised of the two largest defense contractors in the world came close to what Bell achieved in 5 years.
Hats off to the Bell team, definitely. I do laugh when anyone suggests a partnership of equals like Boeing and Sikorsky (or Boeing and Bell, for that matter) accelerates anything. I’ve worked in such partnerships several times... I value what’s left of my career enough to not do it again.
SplineDrive is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.