Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Russia 18 dead in midair helo to helo

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Russia 18 dead in midair helo to helo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Aug 2018, 11:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Russia 18 dead in midair helo to helo

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-r...-idUSKBN1KP086

Mi-8 helicopter which was carrying external suspended cargo and no passengers completed take-off first. Second to take off was a Mi-8 helicopter carrying passengers,” the watchdog said.“After take-off, according to early reports, the Mi-8 carrying passengers knocked into the external cargo of the other helicopter, for reasons unknown. As a result it fell, broke apart and caught fire,” the watchdog said, adding weather conditions were normal.

Last edited by Senior Pilot; 4th Aug 2018 at 11:59. Reason: Fix link and quote
2016parks is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2018, 10:28
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Investigative Committee of Russia has opened a probe into a Russian airline's Mi-8 helicopter crash Saturday in Siberia that killed all 18 people aboard. The helicopter, which belonged to UTair, a Russian airline, crashed Saturday morning in the north of Krasnoyarsk region, eastern Siberia, near the Vankor oil pumping station. Fifteen passengers and three crew members aboard the helicopter were killed, a source at the emergency services told the state-owned TASS news agency. The Mi-8, flying at an altitude of about 328 feet, hooked rotor blades with the cargo of a Mi-26 helicopter of the same company flying nearby before the crash, a report on Investigative Committee's website said. The Mi-26 helicopter made an emergency landing and no one was hurt in that aircraft. So, does the second helo carry anything other than the Mark I eyeball that would inform it of the “extended height envelope” of the first helo?
2016parks is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2018, 11:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,289
Received 511 Likes on 213 Posts
So, does the second helo carry anything other than the Mark I eyeball that would inform it of the “extended height envelope” of the first helo?
Nope....none....nada....nyet.....just the standard issue sets of eyes on 2-3 crew members in the Mil-8.

It appears as though there was a Collective Eye-Brain Interface failure in order to not see a Mil-26 with an Underslung Load....don't you think?
SASless is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2018, 13:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Posts: 1,460
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
ASN Entry

https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=214024

Already in ASN and a list of links to sources there.

Part of a substantial list of Mi-8/Mi-17 accidents but then one also has to consider that the total number built of these types is very large.
jimf671 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.