Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Nicad Battery for 407

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Nicad Battery for 407

Old 5th Feb 2018, 15:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brantisvogan
Posts: 1,033
Received 57 Likes on 37 Posts
Nicad Battery for 407

I've been doing some research for replacement 407 batteries.
I can only find STC's for sealed lead acid batteries (Concorde etc).
While they are the cheaper option they don't last as long so I am trying to find out if anyone produces NiCad batteries or if we have to buy the standard Bell part.
Bell_ringer is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 16:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 26 Posts
Why buy a battery that is not really designed for aviation ?
A NiCad has a memory effect so should not really be trickled charged, which is exactly what you do with your starter gen after a start
I would stick with sealed lead acid, means if you do flatten it you can take it out and charge it from a normal 24 volt cat battery charger.
Unless you can get a NiMh battery or a LiOn battery which do not have memory effects !
Hughes500 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 17:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 751
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Bell_ringer
I am trying to find out if anyone produces NiCad batteries or if we have to buy the standard Bell part.
The only NiCad I know of for a 407 is the original Marathon (28Ah) installed by Bell.
wrench1 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 18:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,841
Received 51 Likes on 36 Posts
While they are the cheaper option they don't last as long so I am trying to find out if anyone produces NiCad batteries or if we have to buy the standard Bell part.
You can source the "original" battery from the manufacturer of the battery through FAA PMA and their distributors.

Bell Helicopter 407,427,430

Type TSP-283
Part No. 31908-001
PMA Supplement 50 (7-1-2005)

I once had to replace a battery in an EC135 (SAFT) in the US. Only source in the US was (then) EC. Quoted USD 22K.
Bought one from supplier in EU USD 8K. Released with a Form 1 with all the necessary paperwork for application.

Google the part number you will get a huge response.
RVDT is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 19:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I find these guys have a huge selection.
https://www.wes.com.au/
Lantern10 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 19:54
  #6 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 830
Received 29 Likes on 15 Posts
Ah yes WES, the well known aviation battery suppliers
TWT is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2018, 04:33
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brantisvogan
Posts: 1,033
Received 57 Likes on 37 Posts
Thanks for the assistance everyone
Bell_ringer is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2018, 06:56
  #8 (permalink)  
Chief Tardis Technician
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western Australia S31.715 E115.737
Age: 71
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You dont want to go the Nicad route, a new Saft 176CH is in the range of $7000, Marathon( if they make one the correct size)would be about the same. The servicing can be expensive, and if more than three cells fail, then you are up for a new battery again.

The Concorde (sealed) is easier to maintain, and if needed in the field could be recharged with an ordinary charger (24V)
Avtrician is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2018, 14:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Beyond the black stump!
Posts: 1,418
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Does anyone still actually use Nicads? You can get some fabulous,small, inexpensive chargers to keep on board. Plus you can airfreight Lead Acid batteries, without all the hassle and expense of a Nicad. And don't even start on the maintenance requirements.
Cyclic Hotline is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2018, 15:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 751
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Cyclic Hotline
Does anyone still actually use Nicads?
Yes. In 407 ops with a high start/flight ratio a NiCad provides a better margin and increased life over the lead acid. Several operators in the GOM tried to switch but went back to NiCad due to start issues, minimum voltage issues, etc. Plus in that environment the lead acids were prematurely failing their capacitance checks, some after just a year TIS.

Most EMS 407 ops went to lead acid as the start/flight was manageable for the lead acid and it added to the reduced DOCs for that type of ops.
wrench1 is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2018, 23:03
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hedge
Posts: 227
Received 23 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by TWT
Ah yes WES, the well known aviation battery suppliers
Commercial batteries do the job just fine. Odyssey batteries have been fitted under EO approval into 206L/350 and even Lama (Lama draws some serious power when starting) . Throw them away after 12 months , maintenance free and replace for a few hundred $$.
Salusa is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2018, 23:42
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Australia
Age: 55
Posts: 199
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Batteries

Batteries are an area I have a fair bit of experience in (renewable energies). NiCd doesn't get the memory effect because they are being trickle charged, they get the memory effect from repeated 'short cycling'. I.e. only taking a portion of their energy before recharging them. In a camera or other consumer device, the solution is simple - regularly discharge them to dead flat before fully charging them. In a chopper, not so easy unless you could swap them out, discharge them on a workbench, and recharge them externally before being swapped back in.

Lead acids... cheap available heavy. They don't respond well to repeated heavy cycling.

It would surprise me that somebody isn't looking at one of the newer battery technologies Li ion etc. Even a NiMh battery would be a better choice as they do not suffer the memory effect that NiCd's do.
Mk 1 is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2018, 04:20
  #13 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 830
Received 29 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Salusa
Commercial batteries do the job just fine. Odyssey batteries have been fitted under EO approval into 206L/350 and even Lama (Lama draws some serious power when starting) . Throw them away after 12 months , maintenance free and replace for a few hundred $$.
That link is for a company that doesn't even sell car batteries, it's a consumer electronics parts shop
TWT is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.