S76 TV Tower in Istanbul/Turkey
Thread Starter


Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 40
From: On the big blue planet
S76 TV Tower in Istanbul/Turkey
At least 5 of 7 POB were killed when a S76 collided with a TV Tower in Istanbul 5 minutes after takeoff in dense fog.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...-five-10001031
skadi
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...-five-10001031
skadi
Last edited by skadi; 10th March 2017 at 13:10.
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Bulgaria
subject
This is how they reported it here...
Istanbul helicopter crash: At least Five Dead - Novinite.com - Sofia News Agency
RIP.
Istanbul helicopter crash: At least Five Dead - Novinite.com - Sofia News Agency
RIP.

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Between security and gate...
Pictures of the crash site below.
Büyükçekmece'deki helikopter kazas?n?n ard?ndan ilk foto?raflar - Foto?raf Galerisi - T24
Büyükçekmece'deki helikopter kazas?n?n ard?ndan ilk foto?raflar - Foto?raf Galerisi - T24
Thread Starter


Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 40
From: On the big blue planet
Last edited by Senior Pilot; 11th March 2017 at 02:09. Reason: Insert YouTube link




Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Actually...height alone is not the criteria..
In this case just as in the London 109 Crane collision proved....track and height combined with visibility determines appropriateness.
In this case just as in the London 109 Crane collision proved....track and height combined with visibility determines appropriateness.
Thread Starter


Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 40
From: On the big blue planet


Joined: Sep 2002
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 4,722
Likes: 637
From: Great South East, tired and retired
There was a bit of a breeze blowing - watch the smoke from the crash - and from my met theory from 1970 I understood that fog won't form in a wind.
So maybe this is low cloud blowing onto the hills, and the lazy ground-based reporters called it fog?
So maybe this is low cloud blowing onto the hills, and the lazy ground-based reporters called it fog?




Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Fog or low cloud....with poor visibility.....are ignoring the simple fact it was the lack of being able to see and avoid the obstacle that is most likely cause based upon either the official forecast or the photo's being posted.
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Ogba
There was a bit of a breeze blowing - watch the smoke from the crash - and from my met theory from 1970 I understood that fog won't form in a wind.

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Mecklenburg Vorpommern
Nowherespecial.
Should it have been allowed to take off then. Maybe out of limits but may have had SVFR approval if on approved low level route. Surely the Local radar would have all A/C on the screen and seen what might happen. My View.
Should it have been allowed to take off then. Maybe out of limits but may have had SVFR approval if on approved low level route. Surely the Local radar would have all A/C on the screen and seen what might happen. My View.


Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,373
Likes: 931
From: Den Haag
I don't think the ATC would have been paying much attention to it, from the little I know of helicopter ops from that airport.

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 491
Likes: 21
From: nowhere special
The area to the North of IST is very much different from the environment at IST. About 5km north you have rolling hills up to about 700' AMSL (IST is about 10' AMSL) with dense vegetation and forests. It absolutely 100% has it's own microclimate there. If they have no specific weather info from the area north of IST (and there are no airfields there so there is nothing accessible) then I suspect you could easily find suitable weather to launch at IST and a situation not close to being VFR in the region to the north.
IST is one of the world's busiest airports, a FW ac departs there every 50 seconds and lands on a different runway at roughly the same interval. The controllers hate RW traffic there as it interferes with the FW too much. From memory there is a speed restriction coming in of about 160kts minimum, hence no IFR for RW. Basically once the RW depart the ramp up by the VIP/ GA terminal, no one cares what you do and no one is really watching, certainly not in real time.
Just my experience of the area though.
IST is one of the world's busiest airports, a FW ac departs there every 50 seconds and lands on a different runway at roughly the same interval. The controllers hate RW traffic there as it interferes with the FW too much. From memory there is a speed restriction coming in of about 160kts minimum, hence no IFR for RW. Basically once the RW depart the ramp up by the VIP/ GA terminal, no one cares what you do and no one is really watching, certainly not in real time.
Just my experience of the area though.





