Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

S76 TV Tower in Istanbul/Turkey

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

S76 TV Tower in Istanbul/Turkey

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th March 2017 | 09:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 40
From: On the big blue planet
S76 TV Tower in Istanbul/Turkey

At least 5 of 7 POB were killed when a S76 collided with a TV Tower in Istanbul 5 minutes after takeoff in dense fog.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...-five-10001031

skadi

Last edited by skadi; 10th March 2017 at 13:10.
skadi is offline  
Reply
Old 10th March 2017 | 11:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Bulgaria
subject

This is how they reported it here...

Istanbul helicopter crash: At least Five Dead - Novinite.com - Sofia News Agency


RIP.
bgbazz is offline  
Reply
Old 10th March 2017 | 12:01
  #3 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Between security and gate...
Pictures of the crash site below.

Büyükçekmece'deki helikopter kazas?n?n ard?ndan ilk foto?raflar - Foto?raf Galerisi - T24
Tetsuo is offline  
Reply
Old 10th March 2017 | 18:46
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Endem TV Tower

Elevation at the Endem TV tower: 193 m
The tower itself has a height of 236 m. There is a visitor area between 148 to 160 m.
Spunk is offline  
Reply
Old 10th March 2017 | 19:27
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 40
From: On the big blue planet
Crash was recorded by a nearby CCTV

https://youtu.be/72a3WLSbk-I



skadi

Last edited by Senior Pilot; 11th March 2017 at 02:09. Reason: Insert YouTube link
skadi is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2017 | 11:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: New York, NY
That tower seems to be over 10 miles from the Ataturk airport (their reported departure point). Is 700' AGL appropriate at that location? It is an urban area.
2016parks is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2017 | 13:17
  #7 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 386
Likes: 4
From: steady
Originally Posted by 2016parks
Is 700' AGL appropriate at that location
I think the outcome is testament to the fact that 700' was in fact not appropriate.
whoknows idont is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2017 | 13:26
  #8 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Actually...height alone is not the criteria..

In this case just as in the London 109 Crane collision proved....track and height combined with visibility determines appropriateness.
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2017 | 17:16
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 365
Likes: 15
From: CYPG
How did ANYONE on board survive that...
Winnie is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2017 | 18:04
  #10 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,373
Likes: 931
From: Den Haag
Originally Posted by Winnie
How did ANYONE on board survive that...
I'm assuming it was early reporting and only 5 confirmed. Can't believe anybody survived.
212man is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2017 | 09:36
  #11 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Mecklenburg Vorpommern
Visibility

Reported as being Foggy - Many pictures show otherwise!
Would local radar not have seen what was about to happen and issued a warning.
Michael Gee is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2017 | 10:32
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 40
From: On the big blue planet
Originally Posted by Michael Gee
Reported as being Foggy - Many pictures show otherwise!
Would local radar not have seen what was about to happen and issued a warning.
These were the conditions right after the crash



skadi
skadi is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2017 | 21:39
  #13 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 4,722
Likes: 637
From: Great South East, tired and retired
There was a bit of a breeze blowing - watch the smoke from the crash - and from my met theory from 1970 I understood that fog won't form in a wind.

So maybe this is low cloud blowing onto the hills, and the lazy ground-based reporters called it fog?
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2017 | 23:34
  #14 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Fog or low cloud....with poor visibility.....are ignoring the simple fact it was the lack of being able to see and avoid the obstacle that is most likely cause based upon either the official forecast or the photo's being posted.
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2017 | 00:41
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Ogba
There was a bit of a breeze blowing - watch the smoke from the crash - and from my met theory from 1970 I understood that fog won't form in a wind.
I guess you never learned about advection fog or frontal fog then? The official definition of fog is just horizontal visibility of less than 1,000 metres (0.54 nm) caused by water droplets suspended in air, from what I learned in met theory
Keke Napep is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2017 | 08:17
  #16 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
keke - AC was referring to radiation fog with his comments about wind - I think you'll find he knows plenty about the other forms.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2017 | 09:54
  #17 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 491
Likes: 21
From: nowhere special
MG - Istanbul Ataturk does not allow IFR rotary traffic so this ac would have been flying VFR, in theory along a set route and thus collision information unlikely to be passed.
nowherespecial is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2017 | 11:59
  #18 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Mecklenburg Vorpommern
Nowherespecial.
Should it have been allowed to take off then. Maybe out of limits but may have had SVFR approval if on approved low level route. Surely the Local radar would have all A/C on the screen and seen what might happen. My View.
Michael Gee is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2017 | 12:01
  #19 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,373
Likes: 931
From: Den Haag
Originally Posted by Michael Gee
Nowherespecial.
Should it have been allowed to take off then. Maybe out of limits but may have had SVFR approval if on approved low level route. Surely the Local radar would have all A/C on the screen and seen what might happen. My View.
I don't think the ATC would have been paying much attention to it, from the little I know of helicopter ops from that airport.
212man is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2017 | 12:29
  #20 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 491
Likes: 21
From: nowhere special
The area to the North of IST is very much different from the environment at IST. About 5km north you have rolling hills up to about 700' AMSL (IST is about 10' AMSL) with dense vegetation and forests. It absolutely 100% has it's own microclimate there. If they have no specific weather info from the area north of IST (and there are no airfields there so there is nothing accessible) then I suspect you could easily find suitable weather to launch at IST and a situation not close to being VFR in the region to the north.

IST is one of the world's busiest airports, a FW ac departs there every 50 seconds and lands on a different runway at roughly the same interval. The controllers hate RW traffic there as it interferes with the FW too much. From memory there is a speed restriction coming in of about 160kts minimum, hence no IFR for RW. Basically once the RW depart the ramp up by the VIP/ GA terminal, no one cares what you do and no one is really watching, certainly not in real time.

Just my experience of the area though.
nowherespecial is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.