Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Elevation/Density Altitude for Private Pilots

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Elevation/Density Altitude for Private Pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd January 2017 | 15:16
  #21 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 387
From: Brantisvogan
Helo performance specs are not unlike a VW's diesel efficiency - results may vary in the real world.
If you want to do more, either buy one with more seats than you need or have thinner friends/pax.
Bell_ringer is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2017 | 16:17
  #22 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 40
From: On the big blue planet
Also performance problems?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WziCFntg_9E

skadi
skadi is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2017 | 04:33
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,191
Likes: 26
From: Top of the World
hey skadi....that ain't no performance problem, note the comfortable HIGE; 'twas a Pilot management problem (couldn't manage the machine correctly)
Vertical Freedom is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2017 | 07:59
  #24 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 118
Guys
When looking at the graphs remember a few things. They were made by test pilots ( i.e. better than us ) trying to make it as good as possible ! With cleaned and polished blades and a new engine. So they are going to get a better figure than us mere mortals !
Hughes500 is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2017 | 09:53
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Germany
If You think the Crapinson 22 runs out of puff fast, try flying an H269 or a Franklin engined 47D
I always thought that the R22 (O-360, 131hp) has more power problems than the 269 (HIO-360, 190hp). Ok, the 269 has some 100kg more empty weight and some 300kg more MTOW, but under "normal" german summer conditions (about ISA+20), I´ve never experienced real problems in the 269, not even with me having 90kg and my TRE having some 120kg.
Thracian is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2017 | 10:06
  #26 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 816
Likes: 5
From: Home
There is the 300C and the 300CB. The CB has less power.
GoodGrief is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2017 | 10:26
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Originally Posted by GoodGrief
There is the 300C and the 300CB. The CB has less power.
Ah, ok. Only flew the C. No issues... ;-)
Thracian is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2017 | 11:46
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Univers
Guys
When looking at the graphs remember a few things. They were made by test pilots ( i.e. better than us ) trying to make it as good as possible ! With cleaned and polished blades and a new engine. So they are going to get a better figure than us mere mortals !
Wrong! Performance charts (Hover) are yes made based upon test pilot flights data but the skill to maintain a zero wind hover does not require a test pilot and the engine power at which the charts are made is the minimum spec power i.e. a fully deteriorated engine.
Margins is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.