Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

What about helicopters needs fixing?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

What about helicopters needs fixing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jul 2002, 23:01
  #61 (permalink)  
Nick Lappos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Shy Torque-

That weeping oil is the Automatic Corrosion Protection Device (ACPD). Quit complaining!
 
Old 24th Jul 2002, 04:40
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SA, TX, USA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi all,

Here's my five.

1 Lower cost of acquisition and operation.

2 Make it hard to break and easy to fix.

3 Make it a generalist ie. good for O/S, EMS, ......but easy to specialize.

4 Standardize updates and options, where I work we have 4 412s and not one of them has the same electrical schematic, my mechs love this undocumented feature. Perhaps empty switch panels and CB's like on automobiles with designated relays and such for add ons.

5 Make it easy to sell. I can tell my customer that what they fly is the wrong aircraft for what they do but it's hard to tell them what the right one is. The current alternatives either have too many negatives or have priced themselves out of consideration.

An example of this at work would be the 407, the off-shore vendors could show that 2 407s replaced three or sometimes more 206s and though they cost more per air frame actually saved the customer money through greater capability and efficiency.

My specific wish would be for a single pilot IFR twin, room for two patients, two medics, or four medics with an isolette, 150 kt vh, 350 mi range w/reserves at vh. I'd like to keep it full of fuel on the pad and still be able to pick up two 300 lb patients 5 minutes away and climb vertically to 100' before accelerating. I'd also like to be able to see well outside day and night. Price this at 3.5 to 4.5 million and keep the DOCs low and I'd beat feet to the boss's door.

Sincerely,

Brian Long
RotorDroop is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2002, 09:01
  #63 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,598
Received 454 Likes on 241 Posts
Nick,

Thanks for explaining about the ACPD.

Hey Nick,

The ACPD on our other machine isn't working!
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2002, 11:37
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To cover some of the offshore industry needs, which is going increasingly farther out, 150-250 nm. out I think the 5 things would be:

- Range/speed with full IFR reserve
- Ergonomical laid out cockpit, meaning seats, instrumentation, more effective noise cancelling and vibration free cockpit, aircondition, sunvisors.
- more presice autopilots reliable down to around 40 kts for IFR rig approaches( 70 kts today )
- Larger passenger cabins and cargo space
- Better customer support!

More and more pilots are loosing their medical licence due to "Tinintus" and bad hearing. This is a mayor problem for pilots flying SuperPuma`s of all types but most the MKII.
AirJockey is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2002, 07:11
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada/around
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with the first reply.

Less noise for more public acceptance.

Lower DOC's to reduce seat costs.

Better infrastructure.

Good 300nm useful IFR range.

Always reliability and good ergonomics.
HeloTeacher is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.