Happy 60th Birthday to the Huey

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 959
Likes: 3
From: New Zealand
Just incredible.
Which makes me wonder - what do people think is the greatest helicopter of all time? Not the fastest or meanest or highest or oldest or heaviest - just the one that has the greatest overall impression.
For me it's the Huey with daylight second.
Which makes me wonder - what do people think is the greatest helicopter of all time? Not the fastest or meanest or highest or oldest or heaviest - just the one that has the greatest overall impression.
For me it's the Huey with daylight second.
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 175
Likes: 2
From: US
There is no doubt (to my mind) that the Huey (really the H model)takes the prize. Here is what I penned this morning to send to some folks (The olive drab green text is quite intentional):
Today, October 20th 1956, the U.S. Army XH-40 prototype helicopter flew for the first time. This aircraft was the first turbine powered helicopter in the Army fleet and was powered by a 700 shaft horsepower Lycoming XT-53-L-1. The Army was not slow to accept the aircraft and it became the UH-1 Huey. The variant we now fly is a bit bigger than the XH-40 and has more than twice the available horsepower. This is the 60th anniversary of that flight. The UH-1 was also largely responsible for the initiation of the Warrant Officer flight training program which allowed high school graduates to become Army aviators without being commissioned officers. Hats off to all the aircraft still flying or those that are on sticks in parks and museums as well as to the people who maintain and fly them.
It took a twin engined machine to replace it. The Huey is up there with the DC3/C-47 and considering that at its best it isn't the smoothest flying ship in the world, it is outstanding that it just keeps going and going if you care for it.
Today, October 20th 1956, the U.S. Army XH-40 prototype helicopter flew for the first time. This aircraft was the first turbine powered helicopter in the Army fleet and was powered by a 700 shaft horsepower Lycoming XT-53-L-1. The Army was not slow to accept the aircraft and it became the UH-1 Huey. The variant we now fly is a bit bigger than the XH-40 and has more than twice the available horsepower. This is the 60th anniversary of that flight. The UH-1 was also largely responsible for the initiation of the Warrant Officer flight training program which allowed high school graduates to become Army aviators without being commissioned officers. Hats off to all the aircraft still flying or those that are on sticks in parks and museums as well as to the people who maintain and fly them.
It took a twin engined machine to replace it. The Huey is up there with the DC3/C-47 and considering that at its best it isn't the smoothest flying ship in the world, it is outstanding that it just keeps going and going if you care for it.
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Canada
8720 hrs on the Huey alone and the day I will stop flying it will be the day I retire.
I have nothing but good memories with this aircraft, even the scary ones are good ones.
Happy birthday to the Huey and tanks for all the good times you gave me.
JD
I have nothing but good memories with this aircraft, even the scary ones are good ones.
Happy birthday to the Huey and tanks for all the good times you gave me.
JD


Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 189
From: Redding CA, or on a fire somewhere
Indeedy:
With a long line on the Lowell Fire in2015

Working with CalFire using Belly Hook

Photo credit: Skip Robinson
And our Bell 205A1++ sitting at base :

Photo credit: Josh Emmons
With a long line on the Lowell Fire in2015

Working with CalFire using Belly Hook

Photo credit: Skip Robinson
And our Bell 205A1++ sitting at base :

Photo credit: Josh Emmons
Nigerian In Law



Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 92
From: The stool at the end of the bar
Great Iconic Aircraft
Only flew the 212, 412 Classic/SP/HP/EP but the 212 was an absolute joy. The most forgiving aircraft ever.
A lot of the guys on the operations I was on had flown the Huey in various theatres and configurations and they worshipped it, to a man.
Automation is the way of the world nowadays
Great photos Gordy !
NEO
A lot of the guys on the operations I was on had flown the Huey in various theatres and configurations and they worshipped it, to a man.
Automation is the way of the world nowadays

Great photos Gordy !
NEO




Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
The Huey flew better than the 212.
Just like the DC-3, the C-130, the B-17...some aircraft are just "right".
My last ever flight was in a Huey...from Blackpool to Redhill with Flying Lawyer on an absolutely stunning Day. What a way to end a flying career!
Just like the DC-3, the C-130, the B-17...some aircraft are just "right".
My last ever flight was in a Huey...from Blackpool to Redhill with Flying Lawyer on an absolutely stunning Day. What a way to end a flying career!

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Canada
That's right SASless, UH 1D/H, B205 compared to the 212 was easier to fly, easier to hover, better lifter (at lower altitude) but not as fast and not as smooth, all in all a better platform for general work, longline etc Even the B204 is not as stable, as easy to fly as a B205 with original blades.
JD
JD

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 90
From: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Gordy,
Your N205BT in a previous life. C-GFHG LFKB Bastia Corsica ~ July 1990. Still in Omani paint job. I did about 300 hours in it and it only had about 4000 total then. Sweetest 205 I ever flew and compared to others it was like "new". Fijdor flew the other aircraft which I think was SE-HMS.
It would be interesting to find the highest time 205. I flew C-GFHA in 1991 in Spain and it had ~ 27,000 hours on it then! I see it is possibly still around as N386HQ with Heliqwest so who knows. Another ship that is apparently with them is N205HQ which had ~ 22,000 on it when I last flew it in 1989.
Granted they are not really "Hueys" but they are close enough and owe a lot for their heritage. Too bad Bell never made more of them. Would love to fly a 212 Single.
Your N205BT in a previous life. C-GFHG LFKB Bastia Corsica ~ July 1990. Still in Omani paint job. I did about 300 hours in it and it only had about 4000 total then. Sweetest 205 I ever flew and compared to others it was like "new". Fijdor flew the other aircraft which I think was SE-HMS.
It would be interesting to find the highest time 205. I flew C-GFHA in 1991 in Spain and it had ~ 27,000 hours on it then! I see it is possibly still around as N386HQ with Heliqwest so who knows. Another ship that is apparently with them is N205HQ which had ~ 22,000 on it when I last flew it in 1989.
Granted they are not really "Hueys" but they are close enough and owe a lot for their heritage. Too bad Bell never made more of them. Would love to fly a 212 Single.
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Canada
That's right RVDT, that was me behind you there (not the 212) with the Danish lease SE-HMS I believe the 212 was there to replace me due to the lost of the Tail-Pipe in flight resulting in the burning of the upper deck and tail-boom.
JD
Also just remembered that it ended up not a good day for both of us, you ended up parked right beside me with engine problems.
JD
Also just remembered that it ended up not a good day for both of us, you ended up parked right beside me with engine problems.
Last edited by fijdor; 21st October 2016 at 21:55.

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 386
Likes: 4
From: steady
That's right SASless, UH 1D/H, B205 compared to the 212 was easier to fly, easier to hover, better lifter (at lower altitude) but not as fast and not as smooth, all in all a better platform for general work, longline etc Even the B204 is not as stable, as easy to fly as a B205 with original blades.
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Here it is from the easiest to fly, that doesn't mean the last one on the list is hard to fly, it simply mean not as easy to fly compared to the first one. Of course that's my opinion based on the kind of work I have been doing with those aircrafts, somebody else could have a different experience.
JD
1 B205 with regular blades stab bar
2 B205 with 212 blades stab bar
3 B212 stab bar
4 B204 stab bar
5 B214ST SCAS
6 B214B SCAS
JD
1 B205 with regular blades stab bar
2 B205 with 212 blades stab bar
3 B212 stab bar
4 B204 stab bar
5 B214ST SCAS
6 B214B SCAS








[/URL]
