Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Silverstone GP 2016

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Silverstone GP 2016

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Mar 2016, 09:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Silverstone GP 2016

Congratulations to Sloane and Freshair (trading as Silverstone Helicopters Ltd) on winning the contract to run the Grand Prix heliport at Silverstone for 2016.
There are obviously some big changes in the operation and I wondered if anyone knows who will be providing ATC Services and Comms for the event? I understand that the team that have provided these services for the past 20 years plus are no longer involved.
finals06 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2016, 10:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Great ! With luck they may get 10 helicopters ! There are now NO major events in the UK that attract big numbers of helicopters ..... ( Silverstone used to be the busiest heliport in the world on the main days ..I guess it wouldn't be 10% of that now .)
nigelh is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2016, 14:16
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It’s a real shame that we are witness to the demise of what was once hailed as the ‘Premier Special Event in the country’. It is of course a long time since those glorious heady days back in 1999 when two heliports saw 4,200 movements on race day. The heliport however, to the best of my knowledge, was seeing a respectable 1500 to 1800 movements on GP Sunday. For what ever reason this has sadly fallen away of late but it is still a busy event for helicopters, and in the right hands and at the right location I am sure it could grow and develop again. Twin only and no parking or fuel has obviously had a massive impact and of course the ludicrous landing fees have scared off many long standing operators and their clients. With a new regime running the show and with obvious massive savings made in some departments it would have been nice to see them backing off a little with the slot fees but this sadly seems not to be the case. Maybe this is a transitional year and we can expect a more user friendly and viable operation in the future. I for one certainly hope so because if not, the way things are going, there will be no need for a Grand Prix Heliport at Silverstone in a few short years.
finals06 is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2016, 16:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
NigelH - just for the record, the BGP 2015 Sunday had 47 visiting helicopters in all (A109 x 19. AS355 x 16, AS365/155 x 5, EC135 x 4, S76 x 3) and that doesn't include the EMS cover, Security, RedArrows commentator etc.

For comparison, Cheltenham Gold Cup day had 55 different helicopters earlier this month, and Royal Ascot last June had a couple of days with over 45 helicopters.

Yes, BGP is much less than what it used to be, and yes, these are numbers of helicopters and not movement or passenger numbers. But they are way more than 10 that you pessimistically predict. Let's give the new incumbents the benefit of the doubt and see what they come up with for 8th to 10th July.
helihub is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2016, 20:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I was actually joking when I said 10 ..... But am horrified to see that I was quite close !!!!! There should be hundreds of helicopters going in and the reason is all to do with over regulation and greedy useless helicopter companies systematically ripping everyone off . My helicopters were leased to fly into all these events every year from around 1985 but rarely now due to landing fees and rules . Luckily I have people who I have dealt with for many years and the helicopter is kept reasonably busy but I think general charter now is dying out slowly , especially in singles . The time was that you couldn't even find a single or twin to hire on these big events as they were ALL busy !! Wouldn't it be nice if someone tried to get it back to how it was .......!!!
nigelh is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2016, 20:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Used to be God's own County
Posts: 1,719
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Cometh the hour......

......cometh the Nigel?

Now that regulation and 'safety' assurance is turning more to 'performance-based' pragmatism........and the increasing wave of commonsense behind the move to 'unleashing' 'singles' in the charter market......is there still a case for 'twins'????
Safety and hazard is determined more by the role than the number of engines - Twins still hit the sea in the NS regardless of how sophisticated they are.....
Maybe the powers that be will recognise that a well-maintained turbine is just as 'safe' as a couple of over-temp'd Alisons?
What Matron? Time for my bed-bath and medication........
EESDL is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2016, 21:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not quite sure what you are saying ........ But think I agree !!
If a single is not deemed to be safe to fly into a huge field in Oxfordshire then we know the industry has lost the plot .....
nigelh is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2016, 10:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Posts: 36
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there anyone in the heli industry (who isn't a commercially biased twin owner) who really thinks that singles shouldn't be allowed into Silverstone GP for safety reasons? Who do we write to at the CAA to ask for this rule to be explained?
When I searched their website, I managed to find a "ruling" about twins sitting next to each other on aeroplanes. I mean really!
love flying is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2016, 12:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Havent you realized yet that singles are really dangerous and twins are really safe ??? Also AOC operators using twins pay far more money to the CAA to get the rules they want . In an ideal world for them all singles would be banned !!
nigelh is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2016, 21:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southend
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Don't forget, cost sharing (upto 6 individuals) makes a single safer and legal on performance!!
HeliAl is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.