Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Logging Multi pilot time for EASA ATPL

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Logging Multi pilot time for EASA ATPL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2016, 18:02
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the Alps
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The waiver is correct, but I cannot "undo" my CPL and redo it at the Bristow Academy. Also, going to the US for 2 years to not an option for everybody.
jymil is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2016, 05:39
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: -
Posts: 67
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That didn't sound like commercial flying, but more like private time building.
To flying commercial you only need 3 take offs and landings within the preceding 90 days, buy you can't just fly anywhere there are more limitations depending on what rules you're following, it's kind of complicated to explain in a sentence.

trying to find a way out of doing the 14 EASA ATPL exams
I'm personally not "trying to find a way out" I'm ok with doing 14 exams even though I find it a bit ridiculous that with an FAA ATPL if you want an EASA one the only thing that count are your flight hours and you have to do all the 14 written tests, I agree that the FAA license is pretty easy compared to other countries but still..
MitchStick is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 17:03
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: -
Posts: 67
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
under EASA it's proper IFR multi-engine hours
That's what I thought too, but then I found this..

IR(H) Instrument Rating | Aerial Helicopter - Rundflüge, Taxiflüge, Flugschule und Businessflüge
MitchStick is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 20:10
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
and even with an EASA multi crew licence you'll still be at the back of an ever- extending line of unemployed pilots.
helimutt is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 20:44
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: England
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Experience in this industry means everything. On a sliding scale if you compare a Jetranger operation with a North Sea operation the experience of pilot required is totally different. Forget the licence type (although a Atpl is min required for P1) experience is what would be in question.
Jetranger operation on a helo value of £250k with max 4 pax requires a vfr cpl with min hours whereas a S92 helo with value of £28m and 19 pax capacity requires experienced pilots.

Getting into this industry as a private/self improver can be extremely difficult let alone expensive. Anyone who does not do their homework and expects to gain good employment soon after passing out needs a reality check.
jeepys is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2016, 04:48
  #26 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: -
Posts: 67
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Man you're annoying when you keep repeating "short cuts" and "cutting corners" WE GET IT!!
Like I said already I'm not trying to cut corners!! Yes I have 1000 hours in an R22 so what, I should kill myself? I never flown in Europe and I'd like to because that's where I'm from, I don't know anything about EASA regulations so I'm asking, (that's the point of a forum right?)

Why would that IFR training not get me an ATPL johni?
And
I'm assuming you're a pilot, how did you get to that straight road with no corners that took you where you are right now?


and even with an EASA multi crew licence you'll still be at the back of an ever- extending line of unemployed pilots.
That could be, I think that to find a job is 50% experience 50% the people you know.
MitchStick is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2016, 05:21
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Earth
Age: 54
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"Experience in this industry means everything. On a sliding scale if you compare a Jetranger operation with a North Sea operation the experience of pilot required is totally different. Forget the licence type (although a Atpl is min required for P1) experience is what would be in question.
Jetranger operation on a helo value of £250k with max 4 pax requires a vfr cpl with min hours whereas a S92 helo with value of £28m and 19 pax capacity requires experienced pilots.

Getting into this industry as a private/self improver can be extremely difficult let alone expensive. Anyone who does not do their homework and expects to gain good employment soon after passing out needs a reality check." QUOTE Jeepys

Hmmm, Ok I'll bite at this statement. The S92 is very rarely hand flown, it has the latest and greatest avionics package and more than a few NS Captains have never really done anything else other than platform to platform work in a state of the art helicopter with full operational and engineering support available at all time. You mention experience, the Co pilot probably only has 300 hours on getting a job in the NS.
Not much experience there is there? Then after several years of this he/she will be a Captain with 3000 hours of boring airline type work and mostly straight and level cruise automated flying under their belt.

Now lets look at old mate in the Jet Ranger who is working a fire the size of a small city, precision drops onto Chimneys (burnt out trees) and saving houses whilst listening to 4 radios and getting instructions about drops from ground units. Hot environment and limited vis...no auto pilot here to help out or another crew member to look at gauges. You are on your own.

Or maybe he's doing 100 landings a day to unprepared sites during survey work, with no access to weather forecasts or any other support....just a bunch of Geologists and he is "The Aviation expert" in their eyes. You have got to know everything about your machine and how it works to be good in this sort of environment.

You're thinking about the UK, where pretty much none of this stuff happens but in the big world outside of CAA land there are very very experienced pilots still flogging around in light singles because thats where the challenges are. So please don't assume the bloke flying the light single is a newbie!
Utility flying beats the crap out of platform to platform work or deck to deck stuff. If the offshore money wasn't so good, I don't know many that would do it to be honest. Probably just the lazy ones and the guys who can't cut it in the utility world.
My two bobs worth.

Last edited by Heliringer; 22nd Jan 2016 at 05:53.
Heliringer is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2016, 14:56
  #28 (permalink)  
hueyracer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It never gets old how people are defending their piece of the grass......


You guys out there in the Jet Rangers have NO Idea how the Offshore business works...

Its not about "how good you land at unprepared landing sites", but about how well you know the (VERY restrictive) procedures that OGP demands.....

You can fly 50 ft above ground and smash the helicopter into a tight landing zone?


Brilliant-but it does not have one single piece of what it takes to fly 100% in line with the books-all the times.....

Have you ever heard of "Stabilized approach criteria", or "sterile cockpit procedures"-or do you have to google it?


I have done both sides-and i prefer any utility job over offshore flying; but offshore flying is where the "big bucks" are....

Offshore is (can be) also a retirement job.........unless you want to get back into a hot and sweaty cockpit, working your balls off......
 
Old 22nd Jan 2016, 18:09
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: England
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Okay Heliringer perhaps I badly worded my post.

I was not implying that a Jetranger pilot is not experienced but that to get a job flying commercially in a 206 in Europe doing light commercial work will not require the most experienced pilot. Someone with 500+ hours would get a look in but a NS commander would have to be a ATPL holder and would have 2500+ min with so many being ME, IR, night hours and multi crew.

Yes the offshore job may not offer as much excitement as some of the utility work but it offers good pay, pension and a pretty stable career (although now is not a good time).

Are you still flying on the NS?
jeepys is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2016, 19:14
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Aberdeen
Age: 54
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I disagree, I love my offshore job. I love going to work every day. Great bunch of people, and love the job. I've done both instruction and charter before I went to Aberdeen. If the choice was 25k doing that, or offshore, I'll do offshore thanks.
tu154 is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2016, 19:50
  #31 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: -
Posts: 67
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
johni,
you still haven't told me why that specific IR course in a SE would not get me an ATPL, if the course is approved by EASA why wouldn't it?
MitchStick is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2016, 19:55
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 807
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
you still haven't told me why that specific IR course in a SE would not get me an ATPL, if the course is approved by EASA why wouldn't it?
An IR course gives you an Instrument rating into your license.
You would then have CPL/IR.
You then need MCC training, a MP type rating, 350 hours MP flight time and an ATPL check ride. Then you get an ATPL.
GoodGrief is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2016, 23:18
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Europe
Age: 55
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what if....

Hy guys,
since you seem to be quite fit at this topic:

I have an EASA ATPL(H), I have a MPH Rating, MCC etc. but I have no IFR (yet).

Would it be enough to do the IR course on a SE helicopter ? Or does it have to be on a ME heli ?

Thank you,
HeliInn
HeliInn is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2016, 05:12
  #34 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: -
Posts: 67
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh I understood that I can't get the ATPL cos the 350 hours of Multi crew, I thought you were saying that for some reasonthe Instrument Rating wasn't valid, I can always get CPL and IR and ATPL frozen which I guess you do the theory and then when you have the hours you do the rest I think, right? Not sure on that one either but I'll figure it out.
MitchStick is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2016, 07:19
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: England
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
The way it used to work which I am sure is still the case:

Example: pass ATPL(H) ground school exams and associated flight test and you will have a shiny new CPL(H) licence drop through your door.

The frozen ATPL exam credits are valid for 3 years from either the date of last exam or flight test pass (cannot remember that bit but I thinks it's the former).

If you do your IR within this period then you will have a CPL(H) IR.

You can then spend so many years getting the rest of the requirements for the issue of ATPL(H), i.e MCC, Night etc.

When you have finally got all the requirements you can do the ATPL flight test upgrade and finally your ATPL(H) will drop through the door.

If you do not do your IR within the three years then you will lose the benefit of being able to do it without taking a number of exams (7 possibly) again.

If you don't want to go through the pain of doing many of the exams again then get the IR done within the three years and worry about the rest of the requirements later.

As I say this is how it used to be under JAR.
jeepys is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2016, 11:33
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Europe
Age: 55
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
err, how is that possible?
I don't think an ATPL is necessarily connected to IR. I got it when I transferred my military license into a civilian one. First I had only CPL(H) but a few years ago they changed the procedure and I could geht an ATPL(H) - I did operate in MPH helicopters and I had a TR on a MPH helicopter. All that's missing now is IR, which I'm interested in because of Age 60...
HeliInn is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2016, 11:34
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Bar to Bar
Posts: 796
Received 9 Likes on 2 Posts
IR is not required for ATPL(H), just need 30 hours instrument flying time. CAP 804 Section 4 Part F.
Sloppy Link is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.