Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

TC Bo105 Fatal Accident & the Cold Water Survival Problem

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

TC Bo105 Fatal Accident & the Cold Water Survival Problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th December 2015 | 13:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: Canada
TC Bo105 Fatal Accident & the Cold Water Survival Problem

In a recent thread, cold water survival in the Gulf of Mexico in the winter has been discussed. http://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/176...ml#post9208485

More extreme is the challenge in the Canadian Arctic. A lot of lessons can be found reading a TSB report on the loss of a Transport Canada operated Bo105 doing ice reconnaissance from a Coast Guard ship.

Canadian Coast Guard Helicopter Accident: CFIT, Survivability and More - Aerossurance

zalt is offline  
Reply
Old 25th December 2015 | 09:23
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 3
From: Escrick York england
Originally Posted by zalt
In a recent thread, cold water survival in the Gulf of Mexico in the winter has been discussed. http://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/176...ml#post9208485

More extreme is the challenge in the Canadian Arctic. A lot of lessons can be found reading a TSB report on the loss of a Transport Canada operated Bo105 doing ice reconnaissance from a Coast Guard ship.

Canadian Coast Guard Helicopter Accident: CFIT, Survivability and More - Aerossurance

Why are the floats not activated ?
md 600 driver is offline  
Reply
Old 25th December 2015 | 09:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 787
Likes: 44
From: Europe
From the report : "The system was manually activated only, with no automatic float deployment" (suspected CFIT).
HeliHenri is offline  
Reply
Old 25th December 2015 | 19:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: Gold Coast, Queensland
If it was CFIT, the pilot wouldn't have blown the floats up as it's unlikely he knew he was about to ditch. I bet it was a bit chilly!
Nigel Osborn is offline  
Reply
Old 25th December 2015 | 20:22
  #5 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 522
Likes: 77
From: USA
I pretty much determined from my dunker training that getting wet was game over. Very sad incident.
Sir Korsky is offline  
Reply
Old 27th December 2015 | 21:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: In the Alps
Sounds like it was not really necessary to fly low over water, altitude is your friend. A radalt would have helped as well for maintaining a minimum altitude, but the report doesn't say if the machine was fitted with it. The giant d*ck mounted on the front was for sure not helping.
jymil is offline  
Reply
Old 28th December 2015 | 00:55
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 365
Likes: 15
From: CYPG
Just the thinking that a Mustang floater suit is in any way, shape or form the same as a full anti-immersion suit is ridiculous beyond belief.

If it does not have booties, cuffs around wrists and a neck seal, it is a floater suit. Even the poor SARtech that perished in the Fox Basin, had an immersion suit and HE survived for 8 hours before he succumbed...

I unfortunately fly over water lots in the arctic, without immersion suits available, but I refuse to wear a mustang suit...

But yes, low flying over glassy surfaces did no one a favor that day.

W.
Winnie is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.