Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Lockheed / Sikorsky

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Lockheed / Sikorsky

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th November 2015 | 08:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: England & Scotland
Lockheed / Sikorsky

Reuters reports (4 Nov 2015) that Chinese regulatory approval has been received for Lockheed, United Technologies to close its acquisition of Sikorsky deal this week.


A good deal for Sikorsky employees / customers? Senator Chris Murphy (Connecticut, Democrat) thinks so.
John R81 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2015 | 14:29
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 118
Well well I think Sikorsky are absolutely fantastic company. Just received an AOG driveshaft in 8 days no sorry 8 months after ordering. I really hope Lockheed know what they have bought
Hughes500 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2015 | 14:54
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 289
From: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
I doubt that Lockheed bought Sikorsky for the Schweizer line! I hope they will sell the legacy Schweizer stuff to a small company, maybe Piper or something similar.
IFMU is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2015 | 16:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 4
From: New Braunfels, TX
Reuters reports (4 Nov 2015) that Chinese regulatory approval has been received for Lockheed, United Technologies to close its acquisition of Sikorsky deal this week.
Wait, what? "Chinese regulatory approval?"
KenV is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2015 | 16:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 1
From: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Oh jeez, don't tell Stinger...

(LockMart needed anti-trust approval from eight nations in which the two companies operate, including the USA, EU, Japan, RoK and China. Sikorsky's Chinese entity being Shanghai Sikorsky Aircraft Co.)

I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2015 | 16:31
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: England & Scotland
I only mentioned the China authorisation to see who would rise to the bait
John R81 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2015 | 19:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 489
Likes: 2
From: UK
Value

Just out of interest how much did Sikorsky buy Schweitzer for? What is it worth now?

I have thought for a while that if you put the certified Schweizer dynamics in a more aerodynamic fuselage you would have a great training/personal helicopter with good performance and a relatively low certification burden. Everyone loves the way the 300 flies, it's just too damn draggy.

...PPRuNe Copters Inc?...

CRAN is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2015 | 20:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 1
From: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Originally Posted by CRAN
I have thought for a while that if you put the certified Schweizer dynamics in a more aerodynamic fuselage you would have a great training/personal helicopter

Manned RQ-8A prototype


I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2015 | 20:35
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 56
From: UK
Originally Posted by CRAN
Just out of interest how much did Sikorsky buy Schweitzer for? What is it worth now?
IIRC, they bought it for the prototyping and UAV capability.

Originally Posted by CRAN
I have thought for a while that if you put the certified Schweizer dynamics in a more aerodynamic fuselage you would have a great training/personal helicopter with good performance and a relatively low certification burden. Everyone loves the way the 300 flies, it's just too damn draggy.
They tried that, didn't they? It didn't end too well:

Bravo73 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2015 | 21:20
  #10 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 118
Bravo

Not really the same is it different blades different engine designed as a 3 seat trainer for US mil contract to have 1 x instructor and 2 students on board. So 3 sets of controls hence wide cabin same as 480 ! Surprisingly 206 won ???
Hughes500 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2015 | 21:29
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Midlands
http://www.pprune.org/9169432-post8.html

Wow, AAR on a civvy airframe.*
Planet Basher is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2015 | 23:28
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 289
From: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Air to air refueling? Looks more like an air data boom to me. That was the manned firescout prototype.
IFMU is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.