Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Bond Profits Article

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Bond Profits Article

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th October 2015 | 08:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 595
Likes: 58
From: UK
Bond Profits Article

Interesting article in the current times....

https://www.energyvoice.com/oilandga...ter-firm-bond/
helicrazi is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2015 | 08:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 744
Likes: 5
From: london
I am glad I am not a Babcock shareholder. To pay £1.6 billion for a company which made £6.5 million before tax in a good year and only has assets and cash of £31 million........
homonculus is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2015 | 09:11
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: XXXX
I think the 1.6 Billion will have been for the Avincis Group , not just Bond Offshore Helicopters
BabyGravy is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2015 | 11:52
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 491
Likes: 21
From: nowhere special
Would love to know what the similar results are for the other parts of the business, Inaer (Italy) in particular....

Making 6.5m on revenue of 180m odd is also not a huge amount, maybe hints at some other issues?
nowherespecial is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2015 | 11:58
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 491
Likes: 21
From: nowhere special
Found it, even in June this year they noted that they won contracts but at low margins in Ghana and Moz....

https://www.babcockinternational.com...nal_6.30pm.pdf

Annual report does note their good credit rating meaning better procurement and leasing terms though.

https://www.babcockinternational.com...f_09062015.pdf

Last edited by nowherespecial; 20th October 2015 at 11:59. Reason: Typo - not to note
nowherespecial is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2015 | 22:23
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 56
From: Anglia
Apparently there is a form of Babcock-ism doing the rounds...like all take-overs, it may not be nice for some when the corporate ideology moves in!
Rigga is offline  
Reply
Old 20th October 2015 | 22:05
  #7 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 16
From: Waltham Abbey, Essex, UK
Those at Helitech might have picked up the rumour that it seems likely that the Bond name will go soon, already Babcock is a far greater presence than Avencis was.

Those not at Helitech might not have picked up on that .....
PANews is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2015 | 06:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 276
From: GMT
Those at Helitech might have picked up the rumour that it seems likely that the Bond name will go soon
Surprising - it looks like the old elements of Avensis are either being sold off or starved to pay for INAER.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2015 | 08:15
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 56
From: UK
Originally Posted by minigundiplomat
Surprising - it looks like the old elements of Avensis are either being sold off or starved to pay for INAER.
Which 'elements' are being sold off (apart from NHS)?
Bravo73 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2015 | 08:29
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 276
From: GMT
Which 'elements' are being sold off (apart from NHS)?
There was only NHS, Bond and INAER to start with. NHS has been sold and Bond AU is shedding jobs.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2015 | 10:15
  #11 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 56
From: UK
Originally Posted by minigundiplomat
There was only NHS, Bond and INAER to start with. NHS has been sold and Bond AU is shedding jobs.
NHS never won a contract so was loss making from the start. Same with the Bond Australia S92s (hence the job losses on that fleet).

Hardly the 'fire sale' that you allude to. (Unless you know more...)
Bravo73 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2015 | 11:08
  #12 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 1
From: uk
With regards to the Bond name going as with most takeovers a certain amount is put onto the balance sheet as goodwill, and is shown as a credit, ie how much is the 'brand' worth, therefore the name is often retained for a certain period. Over time it is decreased and naturally phased out. Maybe the Bond name (and its associated loss record) is no longer assumed to be a positive for the new company?
Lychee is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.