Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

NZ CAA prosecuting 'rescue' pilot

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

NZ CAA prosecuting 'rescue' pilot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Oct 2015, 20:27
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 956
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
"2 examples of many:

Sir Richard "Hannibal" Hayes

Otago Rescue Helicopter"

Also the main guys in Auckland/Wellington of course.
The Helicopters | Auckland Rescue Helicopter Trust

Central North Island
Homepage - Philips Search and Rescue Trust

Queenstown (where the mountains are):
Night vision | Southern Lakes Helicopters, Fiordland, New Zealand

Canterbury/West Coast (where the *big* mountains are):
Canterbury West Coast Air Rescue Trust Westpac Rescue Helicopter Christchurch Greymouth New Zealand

Northland:
Northland Emergency Services Trust (NEST) | Northland?s dedicated emergency helicopter rescue service

That seems to cover the whole country with day/night/NVG and a mix of AS350s, BK117's and S76s.
krypton_john is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2015, 21:01
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,327
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
The first one I look at has
This impressive technology enhances the pilot's visual acuity at night to 20/25 vision as opposed to unaided vision at night of
they must be even better than the best US goggles - 20/35 is a really good set of NVG.

Who, nationally, is responsible for monitoring standards and SOPs amongst those 'SAR' operators?
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2015, 21:18
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,847
Received 56 Likes on 37 Posts
Wanna job Crab? You might be just the man.
RVDT is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2015, 21:33
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,847
Received 56 Likes on 37 Posts
Advisory Circular for NVIS Operations is located here.

Pretty much aligned with FAA requirements.
RVDT is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2015, 02:13
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Silsoe Sid. Land SAR is controlled by local police. My understanding it was the local Police sergeant on the ground who said to the pilot "you'll have to do it"

RCCNZ is part of Maritime NZ - a Government Department. It is responsible for responsible for coordinating "all major maritime and aviation search and rescue missions within New Zealand’s search and rescue region land-based missions arising from someone activating a distress beacon."

The New Zealand SSR is 30-million sq KMs covering a large part of the Pacific Ocean from the Equator to the Antarctic, and from half way to Australia to half way to Chile.
Te_Kahu is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2015, 19:45
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,327
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
RVDT - According to that circular, you could have a PPLH holder with no IR (but having demonstrated very basic IF skills), with minimum night hours and single figure NVG hours acting as PIC on NVG - that's not worrying at all!!!

I note that a rad alt is mandated but a selectable low height bug and associated audio warning are just recommended! That couldn't possibly go wrong.

The circular is a nice list of things to cover but no real limits for things like 'low level searching' or winching - if a military SOP was written so loosely and without clear direction, it would be torn up and started again.

It starts off by stating that NVG is to aid VFR night flight only but them glosses over the sort of things that can easily go wrong = winching, low level searching, unimproved sites, confined areas etc.

No rad alt setting procedures (because the bug isn't mandated), allowing pilots to fly with different generations of NVG in the same cockpit (who can see what the other can't?)

All in all rather amateurish and in no way an assurance that NVG ops are conducted safely or professionally in NZ.

As you might guess I might be the wrong man for the job
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2015, 19:52
  #107 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
allowing pilots to fly with different generations of NVG in the same cockpit (who can see what the other can't?)
I flew RAF helicopters when the SOP was that the PNF wasn't even allowed NVG, although the PF and crewman were. This included confined area landings. I was the PNF and was expected to take control and save the day if the goggles snowflaked out. They did, just inside the top of the CA, which was in a very large German forest, and I had to!

Edit: Actually, it was PNG, the RAF hadn't got NVG in those days..
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2015, 20:12
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 956
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
"As you might guess I might be the wrong man for the job"

No argument there.
krypton_john is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2015, 21:40
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,327
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
No argument there.
Well may be I should reconsider since the Kiwis renowned introspectiveness and willingness to acknowledge critical analysis might not prove a barrier to progress

Shy - yes, self-drive nitesun into S Armagh fields with only the crewman on PNG - got the Tshirt but it is 30 years old and we don't have to do it that way any more
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2015, 14:58
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,327
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Oh I forgot - just in case anyone thinks I am being harsh -

The currency for NVG in NZ is 120 days but, if you renew your currency within 60 days of its expiry (ie before it), you can retain the original expiry date - that means a pilot could be classed as current not having flown on NVG for 6 months!!!!!
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2015, 11:25
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: nz
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
definitely wrong man for the job
If all else fails is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2015, 11:54
  #112 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
Shy - yes, self-drive nitesun into S Armagh fields with only the crewman on PNG - got the Tshirt but it is 30 years old and we don't have to do it that way any more
'Cept we didn't have nitesun. Just the normal white landing light. But it can be done (and it was, our crew were doing it 33 years ago and we're all still around).
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2015, 14:38
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,327
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
definitely wrong man for the job
so, Ifallelsefails, you can't see anything wrong with the rather flimsy process by which your regulatory body chooses to assure safety of NVG ops in NZ?

Maybe if a newbie PPLH towards the end of his 6-month currency crashes into someones house you might just have a different view.

Shy, yes, ISTR there was no requirement for nitesun in RAFG - it was done well because it was all we had and probably didn't stop to think how freakin' dangerous it was - which compared to normal RNF, it probably wasn't
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2015, 15:23
  #114 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
Shy, yes, ISTR there was no requirement for nitesun in RAFG - it was done well because it was all we had and probably didn't stop to think how freakin' dangerous it was - which compared to normal RNF, it probably wasn't
It wasn't until my fourth SH tour that the term "RNF" was invented; definitely no Nitesun back then. But the LSs were recce'd with night landing aids laid out by a dedicated ground team....

.......and some of us are still required to do it like that these days - I'm sure you'd soon get used to it again as a corporate pilot.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2015, 16:45
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,327
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
I did quite enough 'interesting' night flying in the 80s both in NI and Cyprus, all pre NVG!

The stuff in the mountains in Cyprus to 'recced' sites in dusty fields or hilltop OPs with just cans of burning kerosene (which often blew out as the downwash hit) as the NATO T were character building.

28 Sqn used to fly heading and time into the hills around Kai Tak and then switch on the landing lamp which hopefully illuminated a bucket that indicated when to turn onto the approach heading for the LS!
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2015, 19:38
  #116 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
28 Sqn used to fly heading and time into the hills around Kai Tak and then switch on the landing lamp which hopefully illuminated a bucket that indicated when to turn onto the approach heading for the LS!
The buckets were actually lumps of concrete which had been cast in a metal waste paper bin, upturned and painted white. I can tell you from personal experience that some of them were subsequently stolen, but I can't imagine why!
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 10:11
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
cans of burning kerosene
which hopefully illuminated a bucket
We used to dream about those in China.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 18:36
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,327
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
And, just to be even handed - that was an awesome performance from the All Blacks today - very many congratulations on a well deserved win.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2015, 00:58
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 956
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Nice words, Crab. Some of the Aussies around here don't seem too enthused with Nigel Owens at the moment. Can't see why!
krypton_john is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2015, 01:46
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,847
Received 56 Likes on 37 Posts
Ozzies got their dose of Barnesy for a change?
RVDT is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.