Helicopter Crash Longford
I'm going with this was a bet lost...."I bet you can't park your heli closer to the pub"
I mean..... COME ON!!! How many options do you have???!!!!!!
https://www.google.at/maps/place/Clo...9de2423025eaf5
...P.S. the pacman banging his head on the wall is perfect for this thread.
I mean..... COME ON!!! How many options do you have???!!!!!!
https://www.google.at/maps/place/Clo...9de2423025eaf5
...P.S. the pacman banging his head on the wall is perfect for this thread.
Dynamic rollover? Don't think so, looks more like disymetry of lift caused by increased induced flow on the building side. Does no one remember their basic PoF lessons warning of the dangers if hovering too close to a hangar? Be warned, Oh best beloved.
Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
SL, the 'dynamic rollover' reference is in relation to the 'granny vid' wetbulb linked to, not this Longford incident as in this one the skids didn't get chance to touch the ground.
That helo was perfectly serviceable when I last flew it in 1976......
Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
P1DRIVER;
The a/c was perfectly serviceable up to a split second the starboard rotor blade hit the building !!!!
The a/c was perfectly serviceable up to a split second the starboard rotor blade hit the building !!!!
He could`ve parked it `a la VL`,tail clear over the canal.......but,but...some other eejit would`ve driven a boat into it,or tried to tie up to the hand-hold....
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Age: 59
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just having another look at the video...
I'm wondering if the first point of impact was the MR making contact with the lamp-post. And if the hole was taken out of the building's wooden cladding by the tail as the aircraft was suddenly rotated.
Have a look at the marks on the lamp-post (roughly in line with the middle of the open window in this photo). Having watched the video a couple more times, it seems this way, but perhaps my imagination.
I'm wondering if the first point of impact was the MR making contact with the lamp-post. And if the hole was taken out of the building's wooden cladding by the tail as the aircraft was suddenly rotated.
Have a look at the marks on the lamp-post (roughly in line with the middle of the open window in this photo). Having watched the video a couple more times, it seems this way, but perhaps my imagination.
Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
He could`ve parked it `a la VL`,tail clear over the canal.......but,but...some other eejit would`ve driven a boat into it,or tried to tie up to the hand-hold....
Have a look at the marks on the lamp-post (roughly in line with the middle of the open window in this photo). Having watched the video a couple more times, it seems this way, but perhaps my imagination.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/endafa...38360/sizes/o/
As you can also see on the other posts, including those on the other side of the canal;
https://www.flickr.com/photos/endafa...01768/sizes/k/
And if the hole was taken out of the building's wooden cladding by the tail as the aircraft was suddenly rotated.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Age: 59
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sid, I reckon, based upon Google Earth that there is about 20ft between building and canal.
Than being the case, in a side-on landing, as was attempted, the left skid would be about 6 inches over the edge - so actually no room.
And in a nose-in attempt, there would only be inches to spare between MR and building with the skid heels flush with the edge.
Than being the case, in a side-on landing, as was attempted, the left skid would be about 6 inches over the edge - so actually no room.
And in a nose-in attempt, there would only be inches to spare between MR and building with the skid heels flush with the edge.
Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
Anyone have any cuttlefish?
Anyway, it will be interesting to see the 'cockpit gradient'
Anyway, it will be interesting to see the 'cockpit gradient'
Last edited by SilsoeSid; 19th Jul 2015 at 22:10.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This pilot considered that the landing site was quote "tight" but "very do-able". It was later proven that the rotor tip clearance was 81cm maximum.
IIRC on SAR, with a crewman to monitor tip clearance, the minimum tip clearance for non life saving was 10 feet laterally.
What is your personal minimum for lateral rotor tip clearance? Does your company publish one or is it left to your discretion?
IIRC on SAR, with a crewman to monitor tip clearance, the minimum tip clearance for non life saving was 10 feet laterally.
What is your personal minimum for lateral rotor tip clearance? Does your company publish one or is it left to your discretion?
