Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

First CH-148s delivered to CAF - finally!

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

First CH-148s delivered to CAF - finally!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th June 2015 | 13:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
From: Canada
First CH-148s delivered to CAF - finally!

CH-148 Cyclones delivered to Halifax airbase - Nova Scotia - CBC News
rotornut is offline  
Reply
Old 21st June 2015 | 13:19
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 2
From: In the air with luck
Sea King replacements: $7.6B Cyclone maritime helicopters lack key safety requirement - Politics - CBC News

Why bother with tenders
500e is offline  
Reply
Old 21st June 2015 | 14:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 1
From: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Plus concerns that even the second engine upgrade being developed for the Cyclone might not be enough:

DND concerned about new Cyclone helicopter's engines

I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Reply
Old 21st June 2015 | 20:04
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 724
Likes: 41
From: Arlington, Tx. US
No doubt the CH-148 fiasco was a major contributor to the UTC's decision to dump Sikorsky along with delays on the CH-53K and no market for the S-76D. It is possible that the new owner will write the program off in the purchase price and require Canada to pay for any fixes. The only prospective owner that probably would not do this would be Textron/Bell with their strong Canadian foot print.

The Sultan
The Sultan is offline  
Reply
Old 21st June 2015 | 22:51
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 379
Likes: 68
From: canada
As a Canadian tax payer, I would be some pissed off at that...
twinstar_ca is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd June 2015 | 03:56
  #6 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 724
Likes: 41
From: Arlington, Tx. US
Twin

I would have thought the $250M per aircraft would have been enough to piss off every Canadian already.

The Sultan
The Sultan is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd June 2015 | 11:49
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 2
From: In the air with luck
Less the penalty payments
500e is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2015 | 20:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: USA
The acquisition contract is only 1.9 Billion of which only 1.5 Billion is for the actual aircraft. The other .4 Billion is for a variety of things like the modification of 28 ships, the training facilities, and spares. The second contract is for the 20 year in service support. Your 250m per aircraft is incorrect. Not that it matters but the actual figure is closer to 60m per aircraft.
Strider21 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st July 2015 | 13:01
  #9 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: On the Rump of Pendle Hill Lancashi
Being as I am a civilian and not really up to accounts going beyond £1M, do I assume all spares plus all training and Fuel plus wear and Tear + upgrades are also covered by that Eye watering Contract Price. Or has this Heli been designed just for the Canadians and no one else..!!??

I am sure somebody is putting a "B" in the wrong column... perhaps adventurous accounting..eh!
Peter-RB is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd February 2016 | 15:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 1
From: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
This week's HELiDATA provides the following update, 12 years into the program:

Industry sources suggest that the OTE (operational testing and evaluation) programme for the Cyclone is showing further slippage, with virtually no flying taking place in the last quarter of 2015 and the aircraft now unlikely to reach initial operating capability by 2021. Full operational capability is not now expected until 2028.
I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Reply
Old 4th February 2016 | 02:03
  #11 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 724
Likes: 41
From: Arlington, Tx. US
The insult is that Canada will be paying exactly the same per year for these ramp rocks as they would if they were fully operational.

The Sultan
The Sultan is offline  
Reply
Old 4th February 2016 | 12:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Canada
How many Seahawk Romeos can one buy for CDN$8 Billion?

We do have a new gov't...
Viper 7 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th February 2016 | 14:10
  #13 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 727
Likes: 47
From: Earth
From the CBC article linked by the OP:

However, when directly asked that same question by another reporter Kenney responded, "Yes," the new helicopters could fly longer than the 30 minutes without requiring additional lubricant.


Hansen said the gearbox lubricant specification is unnecessary.

"I think it was a bogus requirement to begin with. Nobody else in the world has to do that," he said. "To fly 30 minutes [without lubricant] is a modern engineering miracle."
SansAnhedral is offline  
Reply
Old 4th February 2016 | 17:02
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 642
Likes: 2
From: daworld
Viper 7, if you look back at the period 2000-2006, you'll see it was a Liberal government who chose the S92 in the first place.

By the time these things get into service, it will be time to start looking for a replacement!

noooby is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2016 | 20:22
  #15 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 2,180
From: Texas
Originally Posted by noooby
Viper 7, if you look back at the period 2000-2006, you'll see it was a Liberal government who chose the S92 in the first place.

By the time these things get into service, it will be time to start looking for a replacement!

Just like the F-35, only a bit cheaper.
It's OK to mention the F-35, the B Model can Hover, so it could be classes as an honorary helicopter.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th February 2016 | 01:03
  #16 (permalink)  
deHav8
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What is the problem with the engines? Simply not enough power for the payload?
 
Reply
Old 14th February 2016 | 11:11
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 912
Likes: 1
From: UK
Yep...plans to develop a higher power engine were abandoned .
heli1 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.