Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

EASA working Single Pilot Ops until 65

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

EASA working Single Pilot Ops until 65

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th May 2015, 18:37
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Escrick York england
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EASA working Single Pilot Ops until 65

Dennis
Me and Nige are also going to poland were taking the gazelle just going though as spectators

See you there if not before
Steve
md 600 driver is offline  
Old 16th May 2015, 21:33
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ross-on-Wye
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Age and flying

Well it has been ... our dear Uncle Ian did just that a few years ago. I attended several days of the hearing in Kingsway where a solo Ian put forward a truly impressive case backed by enough supporting and sensible facts to fill the room. Yet the Industrial Tribunal stuck their head in the sand for a few months until someone higher up told them to reject Ian's case .... anyone got a cool fifty grand to take the case on at the highest level. Dennis K.
Dennis Kenyon is offline  
Old 16th May 2015, 21:35
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ross-on-Wye
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mis- post

Somehow my post has got itself slotted in the wrong thread. can the Mods fix? Please.


Which thread do you want it in, Dennis?

Splot
Dennis Kenyon is offline  
Old 17th May 2015, 06:30
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: london
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
100 contribute £500

Dennis if you are serious about a challenge, I suggest that the pilot community could pull together & raise the £50k legal fee cost.

I pledge £500, assuming you do the same - we now need 98 others to commit.
Chris66 is offline  
Old 18th May 2015, 12:22
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EASA Aerial Work.

Anyone know why it's taking CAA till 2017 to fall in line with rest of Europe regarding classification of Aerial Work?

My understanding is that elsewhere, everything apart from passenger charter falls into AW rather than CAT.
Once that's in place, filming, photography, survey etc can be flown AW, even with employees of film company/surveyor/utilities or whatever on board.
That would put a smile on my wrinkly face.
Strange that it's taking them so long to sign it off, when I understand that some of the companies have had the new AW manual ready for approval since last year.

Is 65 the upper age limit then, or is it as long as a valid medical is held?
stereojet is offline  
Old 18th May 2015, 17:51
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the big blue planet
Posts: 1,027
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
The age limit for all commercial flying will remain 65 in EASA land.

everything apart from passenger charter falls into AW rather than CAT.
HEMS , apart from SAR, also is CAT, even if the patients dont charter the helicopter

skadi
skadi is offline  
Old 18th May 2015, 19:24
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hotter and Higher than I used to be!
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I pledge £500, assuming you do the same - we now need 98 others to commit.
Count me in!

3 in, 97 more to find...
AK355 is offline  
Old 30th May 2015, 06:19
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the big blue planet
Posts: 1,027
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
zero points for Grat Britain

http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/Informa...ice2015039.pdf

2.1 v

skadi
skadi is offline  
Old 30th May 2015, 06:46
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why "zero points for Grat (sic) Britain"?

2.1 v of the IN is merely stating what the Commission has done, not the UK CAA.
Pete O'Tewbe is offline  
Old 30th May 2015, 09:10
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the big blue planet
Posts: 1,027
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Pete O'Tewbe
Why "zero points for Grat (sic) Britain"?

2.1 v of the IN is merely stating what the Commission has done, not the UK CAA.
Oh sorry, I regret my statement. I misunderstood that part.

skadi
skadi is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.