Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

AW101 helicopter flies Prime Minister David Cameron during NATO Summit in Wales

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

AW101 helicopter flies Prime Minister David Cameron during NATO Summit in Wales

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Sep 2014, 09:27
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: I have a home where the Junglies roam.
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pumaboy
Merlin will never Work in civil SAR or O&G for the reason it is too darn expensive to operate.

Westland tried 20 years ago pitching to all offshore operators even back then there was not the numbers to make affordable to operate in the NS .
Didn't I read somewhere that the big change in the 20 years since then is that oil and gas exploration is pushing the fields further and further out from land, to places where the 225/92 simply can't reach without significant sacrifices like extra tankage in place of pax, pushing the -101 back into the frame (and, possibly, just possibly the Boeing -247)? So too expensive given the current locations of the field, but a possibility given projected locations. Never say never!
dmanton300 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 11:22
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: nowhere special
Posts: 470
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Pumaboy,

The issue is that potentially the AW101 offers something which the O&G operators want and is increasingly a trend: to hit ultra deep water and LR wells. They have Gen 5 drill ships now which can drill in water hundreds of miles offshore but no ability to do crew change or supply it.

There are probably 3/4 helicopters which could do it, CH53 (if they made a civvy variant) CH47 and AW101. 53 and 47 are too big for most decks which leaves the AW101.

While the cost is undoubtedly high, if an oilco got on board (not as stupid as it sounds), esp one of the really big boys (Chevron, EM, Shell, BP), the competitive advantage they could have over their rivals would be large. We're talking about companies which turn over over $1bn a day so investing a few hundred million in some aircraft to enable them to exploit long range wells, especially if it gives them a monopoly on something, is absolutely something they could do.

Just my thoughts. I agree that a regular RW operator (BHL, Bond, CHC et al) could not afford to do it without monumental investment, they don't have the cash.
nowherespecial is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 11:24
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: nowhere special
Posts: 470
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
DM300, sorry I didn't see your post before posting mine, agree with you 100%.
nowherespecial is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.