Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

UK IMC / IR(R) rating

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

UK IMC / IR(R) rating

Old 8th Sep 2014, 11:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: LOWW
Posts: 345
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
UK IMC / IR(R) rating

I'm profoundly confuse regarding the IMC rating:
Restricted Instrument Ratings (IMC / IR(R)) | Private Pilots | Personal Licences and Training

At the very beginning
A) " If you have an EASA or national UK aeroplane licence you can apply for a limited form of instrument rating."

fine. Say I have an EASA PPL.


B) "An IMC rating can also be added into a national UK PPL, but cannot be used in EASA aircraft after 8 April 2014."

What ist an EASA aircraft? What good is an EASA lic. /w UK-IMC as outlined in A) , if I cannot fly EASA aircraft?

Does this sentence mean a UK PPL + N-aircraft may still fly IMC
while the same UK PPL + G-aircraft is not allow to do so after April 8th?


Does something similar exist for PPL(H) Licenses?

Does EASA @2014-post-April8th provide any means of flying in IMC in uncontrolled airspace?

thx in advance
P.
Reely340 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2014, 11:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,953
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Reely340

Does something similar exist for PPL(H) Licenses?
No.

For rotary, it is either VFR or a full IR. No IMC/IR(lite) ratings. This is primarily due to the unstable nature of light, SEP helicopters.
Bravo73 is online now  
Old 8th Sep 2014, 12:54
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: LOWW
Posts: 345
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
For rotary, it is either VFR or a full IR. No IMC/IR(lite) ratings. This is primarily due to the unstable nature of light, SEP helicopters.
Please elaborate why an airplane is more stable than a helo, assuming identical IFR instrumentation.

Especially how a full IR rated PIC makes the helo more stable

Neither has to comply to the "full IFR" ATC raido guided heading, height and frequency changes. Both just monitor the famous six, with the helo having more time to react due to lower airspeed.
Reely340 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2014, 13:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,953
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts


Originally Posted by Reely340
Please elaborate why an airplane is more stable than a helo, assuming identical IFR instrumentation.
Take your hands off the controls of a correctly trimmed aeroplane and the aeroplane will tend to fly straight and level. Take your hand off the cyclic in a R22 and you will be upside down in a matter of seconds. Death will follow shortly afterwards.


Originally Posted by Reely340
Especially how a full IR rated PIC makes the helo more stable
It doesn't. But the 'full IR rated PIC' will invariably be sitting in a twin engine helicopter, probably with an autopilot or stabilisation of some sort. It's that which makes the IFR helicopter more stable.
Bravo73 is online now  
Old 8th Sep 2014, 19:02
  #5 (permalink)  
GipsyMagpie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
B) "An IMC rating can also be added into a national UK PPL, but cannot be used in EASA aircraft after 8 April 2014."

What ist an EASA aircraft? What good is an EASA lic. /w UK-IMC as outlined in A) , if I cannot fly EASA aircraft?

You are misreading b. This is talking about a UK ppl not an easa ppl. UK ppl is now only valid for non easa planes such as permit to fly.

Personally I fly single engine unstabilized helicopters IFR and it's fine. (yes in IMC not "I follow roads") Much better than a certain twin engine single pilot IFR Italian helicopter I might add. Not under easa or UK CAA regs of course.
 
Old 8th Sep 2014, 23:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: bora scirocco
Age: 50
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally I fly single engine unstabilized helicopters IFR and it's fine. (yes in IMC not "I follow roads") Much better than a certain twin engine single pilot IFR Italian helicopter I might add. Not under easa or UK CAA regs of course.

Good luck.

JR
Jet Ranger is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2014, 01:21
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 0
Received 65 Likes on 26 Posts
Can someone explain the UK IMC rating.? Is it a simpler form of instrument rating?

Also in the UK is there a mandatory bi anual flight review for private pilots?

Does a pilot have to do a renewal test for the IMC rating each year or is it everlasting like the FAA instrument rating?
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2014, 04:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 71
Posts: 4,132
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 12 Posts
The IMC rating is for fixed wing pilots to allow descent in visibility less than 1800 m. It was intended as a sort of halfway house for PPLs who didn't really need the full IR, which was designed more for commercial airline pilots.

It only applies in the UK and was going to be scrapped in favour of the new EIR (Enroute IR) from EASA, but that does not allow descent, as the trip must start and end in VMC. The IMC rating has now been given a stay of execution (in the UK only) for the forseeable future, and the two complement each other nicely.

Neither apply to helicopter pilots.

Phil
paco is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.