Greenpeace collaborators false pretense photo charter
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Greenpeace collaborators false pretense photo charter
Greenpeace yesterday zipline-TP'd Procter & Gamble's Cincinnati HQ - and chartered a local R44 to video the event. The helo operator claims he had no clue about the actual purpose of the flight.
Activists protest Procter & Gamble's link to deforestation at the company's Cincinnati headquarters | Greenpeace Blogs
Some video clips:
Activists protest Procter & Gamble's link to deforestation at the company's Cincinnati headquarters | Greenpeace Blogs
Some video clips:
Last edited by barit1; 5th Mar 2014 at 22:43.
That is contrary to what the reporter says at the end of the report (3:05mins). Apparently, the police are investigating whether or not the helicopter dropped repelling equipment to the protesters on the roof!
Originally Posted by barit1 View Post
The helo operator claims he had no clue about the actual purpose of the flight.
The helo operator claims he had no clue about the actual purpose of the flight.
Taking photos of a protest?
Taking photos of an illegal activity?
Hypothetical question, one the purpose of the flight is revealed, is allowing a flight to continue so an illegal activity can be photographed by the organisers of the activity, an act of complicity by the pilot?
Mickjoebill
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hypothetical question, one the purpose of the flight is revealed, is allowing a flight to continue so an illegal activity can be photographed by the organisers of the activity, an act of complicity by the pilot?