Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Sea King Self Starting?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Sea King Self Starting?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th November 2013 | 19:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: near LHR
Sea King Self Starting?

Having been parked in a hospital car park for over 45 minutes near a Sea King helicopter with either an engine or APU running, a friend asked me if Sea Kings were self starting from scratch without a ground power unit.

As an aeroplane driver I can think of several reasons why you might sit for 45 minutes with the engine or APU running, and it seems unlikely to me that an aircraft capable of landing "off piste" wouldn't be self sufficient, but I don't actually know the answer!

TIA if anyone can enlighten me.
NewTimer is offline  
Reply
Old 29th November 2013 | 20:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 83
From: Gold Coast, Australia
Yes, the Sea King has a big thing in the nose called a battery, which produces wiggly amps to the starter generator which turns the engine around while also sending amps to the ignitors which clack away making sparks to ignite the combustible stuff which is sprayed into the appropriate part of the Gnome.

There is no APU, but the blades & No 2 engine can be stopped and the No 1 engine runs the accessory drive train (gens and hyd pumps).
John Eacott is offline  
Reply
Old 29th November 2013 | 20:12
  #3 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Most, if not all helicopters can start from internal power. The reason being that helicopters don't "in the main" tend to operate from near a ground power supply.
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 29th November 2013 | 20:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,174
Likes: 7
From: UK
What JE is trying to say is. The pilot did not know when he was going to get airborne and he wa afraid to shut down completely on the off chance that the batteriy might not be man enough to kick the engines back into life,

It's called insurance. I never bothered. I would shut down and chat up the nurses.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Reply
Old 29th November 2013 | 21:40
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
You have a choice - either keep the number 1 engine running in accessory drive to pretty much guarantee being able to get home or shut down completely and hope the battery has enough oomph to get the first engine started.

All it needs is wet or failed start and suddenly the volts are dropping quickly - we start the number one in manual control as a precaution against low voltage causing fuel computer problems.

Sometimes the choice is dictated by how long the winchman will be handing over the casualty to the hospital staff - we try to get our kit back, especially stretchers, and it may take a while for the casualty to be in a stable enough condition to be safely removed from our stretcher.

Bizarrely, we only have one battery fitted to the Mk3 and 3A when there is appropriate provision for a second one.

We do know it pisses people off listening to jet noise in the middle of the night but a. we have to make sure we can get home and stay on operational state and b. jet noise is the sound of freedom so tough!
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 29th November 2013 | 21:50
  #6 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
All it needs is wet or failed start and suddenly the volts are dropping quickly - we start the number one in manual control as a precaution against low voltage causing fuel computer problems.
This ancient technology.....
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 29th November 2013 | 22:11
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: near LHR
Exactly as I suspected. Thanks for the enlightenment.

NT
NewTimer is offline  
Reply
Old 29th November 2013 | 22:52
  #8 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 56
From: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Originally Posted by Fareastdriver
... I would shut down and chat up the nurses.
Dirty work but ...
jimf671 is offline  
Reply
Old 30th November 2013 | 07:45
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 40
From: On the big blue planet
Bizarrely, we only have one battery fitted to the Mk3 and 3A when there is appropriate provision for a second one.
Two batteries were standard in the german Mk 41s

skadi
skadi is offline  
Reply
Old 30th November 2013 | 07:50
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: England
Jungly Mk 4s also have 2 batteries. However, I never had a problem starting a Mk3 or 3a on battery if you did it in manual throttle. Some crews were/are just afraid of doing this.
crabbbo is offline  
Reply
Old 30th November 2013 | 08:43
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 1
From: Among these dark Satanic mills
I never had a problem starting a Mk3 or 3a on battery if you did it in manual throttle. Some crews were/are just afraid of doing this.
Lucky you, but many crews have been less fortunate...ergo if you have the fuel, why take the chance of ending up stuck on the ground, unable to respond to tasking?
TorqueOfTheDevil is offline  
Reply
Old 30th November 2013 | 11:23
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 464
Likes: 2
From: UK
Putting the port engine into accessory drive, small amount of fuel consumption, keeps all the Hydraulic and electrical systems etc online allowing a quicker rotor start and reducing the chance of a port engine start failure and quicker reaction time in the event of another callout also reducing the chance of blocking the helipad.
WASALOADIE is offline  
Reply
Old 30th November 2013 | 15:56
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Daventry UK
In my day, before reliable(?) mobile phones, it was normal to keep the port engine running on the ground to provide wiggly amps, as opposed to 24v from the battery, to enable use of the HF radio to keep in contact with ARCC.
GrumpyGramps is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.