Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

HHC or IBC anywhere near production?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

HHC or IBC anywhere near production?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Oct 2013, 12:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: LOWW
Posts: 345
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Question HHC or IBC anywhere near production?

I stumbled over the concepts of Higher Harmonic Control (HHC) and the even more sophisticated Individual Blade Control (IBC). HHC seems to superimpose a well triggered, synchronous "rattling" on the swashplate at frequencies of 2/rev or higher (on the stationary side of the swashplate) , and IBC does the same on the revolving side, essentially changing blade pitch link length, individually for each blade, multiple times per rev.

The goal is (external) noise and vibration reduction.

I find the idea of rocking the swashplate at such high frequencies - even if only for +/-1° angle of attack - rather scary, given the forces the swashplate's bearing must withstand due to inertia of blades around their pitch axis. Actuating the individual pitch links sounds even more interesting, considering that fact that they ride around the mast a couple hundred times per second.

Apparently the Germans tortured a good ol' BO105, with promising results: http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public/PubFu...051-PSF-30.pdf


Is any of these concepts aready deployed on a production helicopter, yet?
Reely340 is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2013, 00:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find the idea of rocking the swashplate at such high frequencies - even if only for +/-1° angle of attack - rather scary, given the forces the swashplate's bearing must withstand due to inertia of blades around their pitch axis.
I have seen a couple different IBC concepts with the capability for HHC that have been tested on rotor stands, however none of them involved rocking the swashplate at high frequencies. I've seen small displacement, high-frequency linear EHA devices that replaced the pitch link between the swash plate and blade, such as this concept tested by NASA, which is intended for HHC function only. I have also seen a more recent concept from ZF for a rotary EMA device mounted directly to the hub, which provided both IBC and HHC functions, but I can't find a link for it.

Here's a interesting presentation from ZF covering some of the linear EHA concepts they developed for high-frequency blade control on existing rotorcraft such as CH-53 and UH-60.
riff_raff is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.