Solar Panel on an Avgas Bowser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Boundary Layer
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Solar Panel on an Avgas Bowser
Has anyone tried fitting a solar panel to trickle charge an Avgas Bowser pump battery?
Seems that it should be a relatively straight forward way to keep the battery topped up. I put this to our local trading standards guy and he felt that eliminating the need to disconnect the battery regularly to charge it would lower the risk.
Just wondering if anyone has tried it and has any experiences (good or bad) to report?
CH
Seems that it should be a relatively straight forward way to keep the battery topped up. I put this to our local trading standards guy and he felt that eliminating the need to disconnect the battery regularly to charge it would lower the risk.
Just wondering if anyone has tried it and has any experiences (good or bad) to report?
CH
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know EBG Helicopters down here at Redhill popped a very small panel onto their bowser.
Honestly it's such a small trickle I'm not sure how much assistance it provides - if we had one down the other end of the field I might set up a test!
Try Puntosaurus via the forum as I think he set it up.
Honestly it's such a small trickle I'm not sure how much assistance it provides - if we had one down the other end of the field I might set up a test!
Try Puntosaurus via the forum as I think he set it up.
I would want to be very careful about how you wire the thing up....good grounding, shut off switch that would isolate the Panel at the Panel end itself.....but other than that.....why not!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Warminster, UK
Age: 73
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We fitted one to our 2,000 ltr avgas fixed-position (integrally-bunded) bowser at our small (FW) flying club but then found ourselves served with a prohibition notice until it was removed because it was an unapproved modification to a fuel installation
. However, it had worked very well for us for several years (southern UK, dispensing up to 30,000 litres in a year, with a panel about a foot or so square). So it certainly works from a pure engineering perspective, but regulations are another matter. I understand the problem is that an area within about 4m of the bowser is deemed a hazardous atmosphere area for fire risk (DSEAR regulations) and only properly certified equipment can be installed there, with particular constraints on electrical connections, etc.
So we approached the firm who supplied the bowser and they provided an approved design modification. This consisted of a metal locker stationed about 5 metres from the bowser (i.e. out of the 4m DSEAR area) with a solar panel on it, and the battery was relocated from the bowser into the locker. The panel is continuously attached to the battery, but to actually refuel there is now a long lead stored in the bowser that we unwind and plug into the battery unit. We have been re-inspected with this new system and the inspector was content.
HTH!
. However, it had worked very well for us for several years (southern UK, dispensing up to 30,000 litres in a year, with a panel about a foot or so square). So it certainly works from a pure engineering perspective, but regulations are another matter. I understand the problem is that an area within about 4m of the bowser is deemed a hazardous atmosphere area for fire risk (DSEAR regulations) and only properly certified equipment can be installed there, with particular constraints on electrical connections, etc.So we approached the firm who supplied the bowser and they provided an approved design modification. This consisted of a metal locker stationed about 5 metres from the bowser (i.e. out of the 4m DSEAR area) with a solar panel on it, and the battery was relocated from the bowser into the locker. The panel is continuously attached to the battery, but to actually refuel there is now a long lead stored in the bowser that we unwind and plug into the battery unit. We have been re-inspected with this new system and the inspector was content.
HTH!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: us
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bloody hell, you can have 240 V mains hooked up to the pump, but they're worried about a few volts out of a solar cell
I am not sure of DSEAR regulations but it would require the solar panel and charger to meet Class 1, Group D, Div2 regulations in the US. Then it would have to involve the battery containment as well. Cost wise you would be looking at an exorbitant cost.
Moving out of the 4m radius as Stu B indicated allows use of normal equipment.
VFD
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Boundary Layer
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many Thanks All
Many thanks for all input. It seems that this idea has been used by a number of operations and no problems have been reported - but then I guess if you have got it wrong, you're probably not around to say so!
This is a mobile bowser, so regs about fixed installations don't apply but there may be others that do. I am having bowser inspected at end of the month and will post feedback from the enginneer on the proposed modification.
I can't help thinking that if there were a problem, the sailing / caravanning / camping industry would have seen a number of incidents.
CH
This is a mobile bowser, so regs about fixed installations don't apply but there may be others that do. I am having bowser inspected at end of the month and will post feedback from the enginneer on the proposed modification.
I can't help thinking that if there were a problem, the sailing / caravanning / camping industry would have seen a number of incidents.
CH
Atex-System Explosion Proof Solar panel module SM085 Ex for hazardous areas.
Gespasa · Fluid Technology · / Fuel / ATEX Pumps / AG-600 12 or 24VDC
We are looking at the design of a bowser at present
Anything with ATEX
Gespasa · Fluid Technology · / Fuel / ATEX Pumps / AG-600 12 or 24VDC
We are looking at the design of a bowser at present
Anything with ATEX
Last edited by 500e; 19th Sep 2013 at 10:53.
The suggestions are about safety issues.
That the current efforts have not had a problem does not suggest they are as good as they could be. If they never do have a problem, meet all the regulatory requirements then fair dinkum.
If they don't and you have a hiccup....don't expect your insurance carrier to cover your losses if they find out you had a "cobbled up" system.
Advice is cheap....uninsured uh oh's are not.
That the current efforts have not had a problem does not suggest they are as good as they could be. If they never do have a problem, meet all the regulatory requirements then fair dinkum.
If they don't and you have a hiccup....don't expect your insurance carrier to cover your losses if they find out you had a "cobbled up" system.
Advice is cheap....uninsured uh oh's are not.
