Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

BBC reporting 6 helicopters at M62 mini bus crash scene?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

BBC reporting 6 helicopters at M62 mini bus crash scene?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Apr 2013, 13:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London/Atlanta
Posts: 446
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
BBC reporting 6 helicopters at M62 mini bus crash scene?

26 April 2013 Last updated at 14:02 Share this pageEmailPrint
782
ShareFacebookTwitter
Fatalities feared as 19 injured in crash on M62

West Yorkshire Police said 19 people from the minibus were injured, six of them serious
There are unconfirmed reports of fatalities in a crash on the M62 in West Yorkshire which has injured 19 people, six of them seriously.

Emergency services and hospitals have declared a major incident following the collision between a lorry, a car and a minibus shortly after 11:00 BST.

West Yorkshire Police said the 19 people were in a mini bus which was in collision with a lorry and a car.

The driver of the lorry has been arrested, police confirmed.

Six helicopters
Yorkshire Ambulance Service said it had put major incident procedures in place following the collision on the westbound carriageway near junction 32.

Karl Milner, the executive director of Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, tweeted: "[Leeds General Infirmary] major trauma centre put on alert following pile up on M62 near Castleford".

The North West and Great North air ambulances are among emergency crews at the scene.

At one stage six helicopters were ferrying the injured from the scene.

A spokesman for the Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust said: "Ambulance clinicians are providing treatment at the scene and are working closely with their emergency service colleagues.

"At this time the number of patients is unknown."

Motorists have been urged to use the M18 or M1 instead. The carriageway is not expected to reopen until 18:00 BST.

One man who was stuck in traffic on the motorway tweeted: "Nine ambulances 4 fire engines and god knows how many police cars have gone past."

Are you in the area? Please get in touch using the form below.

(Required) Name(Required) Your E-mail address(Required) Town & Country(Required) Your telephone number(Required) Comments
If you are happy to be contacted by a BBC journalist please leave a telephone number that we can contact you on. In some cases a selection of your comments will be published, displaying your name as you provide it and location, unless you state otherwise. Your contact details will never be published. When sending us pictures, video or eyewitness accounts at no time should you endanger yourself or others, take any unnecessary risks or infringe any laws. Please ensure you have read the terms and conditions.

Terms and conditions

SendClear
nomorehelosforme is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 14:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
It may be 5 not 6 - the Independent thinks Lincs & Notts are two aircraft. But then they don't mention Yorkshire Air Ambulance specifically.. on this page they say

Kevin Hodgson, director of operations at Great North Air Ambulance, said they had sent two air ambulances, which were joined by two from North West Air Ambulance and another two from Lincolnshire and Nottinghamshire Air Ambulance.
Two from North West in photo below from the story on the Mail website

helihub is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 14:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Crowle United Kingdom
Age: 50
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was stuck at the far end of the jam from Manchester. Motorway was solid by Ikea
I diverted past Garforth. The old A1 / A63 was jammed by diverting traffic.
Local radio confirmed six air ambulance.
Two from yorkshire. Two from notts and two from Northwest air ambulance
onyxcrowle is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 14:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Lincs & Notts only have one helicopter and confirmed they were there

Great North also confirmed two

North West - see photo above

Not saying Yorkshire were not there, but their PR machine is behind the curve if they were....
helihub is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 15:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Aberdare, Wales
Age: 31
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it possible that a police helicopter was overhead or landed?
HeliStudent is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 23:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: By the beach
Age: 58
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes. They could have been tasked to provide aerial photography of the scene for evidential purposes or assist with casevacing a patient.

FB
flying bizzie is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 07:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 60
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
There were 2x dauphin, 2x135, 2x109 and a rozzer 902. Seven in total

Last edited by jayteeto; 28th Apr 2013 at 07:13.
jayteeto is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 07:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 60
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
I am assuming the last one was a 109, didnt actually see it, but heard it.
jayteeto is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 07:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever someone will pay me to do fun stuff
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just curious....

The photo shows the aircraft on what looks like a relatively narrow grass verge.

I would have thought that it would be preferable to let down onto the road where the surface conditions are easier to see and there is probably less risk from FOD.

I guess behind the barrier is better protected from vehicles but I just wondered if there are there other reasons that don't come to my mind.

Thanks.
LookingForAJob is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 08:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 60
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
All on motorway.
jayteeto is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 15:39
  #11 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
I would have thought that it would be preferable to let down onto the road where the surface conditions are easier to see and there is probably less risk from FOD.
Mmmm, having noticed the amount of rubbish in motorway central reservations and on hard shoulders ....

Clean Highways | Motorway litter | Litter laws
http://www.cleanhighways.co.uk/wp-co...Motorways1.pdf

Our road networks, in particular our motorways are “blighted by rubbish. I am aware that there is legislation in place however ….. it is frankly not working“.

Mike Penning MP
Under-Secretary of State for Transport
2010 – 2012 speaking in March 2010


http://www.cleanhighways.co.uk/wp-co...06/Before7.jpg



...and I guess it's also safe to land on astro turf pitches !

Last edited by Senior Pilot; 28th Apr 2013 at 22:11. Reason: Image too big for PPRuNe
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 15:50
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: UK
Age: 52
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't help but wonder why Leconfield's Sea King was not used. Surely this incident deprived a lot of areas of their air ambulances, which might be seen as a bit unnecessary when a large aircraft with room for multiple cas was around 20 min flying time away. Thoughts?
Pol Potty mouth is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 16:06
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 60
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
That would deprive an area of its search and rescue helicopter.
This is what we do, we also help each other in times of great need. If a job had come in at home, we would assess whether to send one back.
jayteeto is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 17:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny Scotland
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That would deprive an area of its search and rescue helicopter.
That's right. Leconfield's Sea King can't be used for rescuing people in case it is needed to rescue people

This is what we do
So do Leconfield if they are asked.

It would be a perfect platform for a job like this that involves multiple casualties but that would involve the air ambulance dispatchers asking for help which is very rare these days.

Why use one or 2 helicopters when you can use 6?
SAR Bloke is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 17:26
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: J10 M40
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A factor might have been availability of A&E receiving capability , as they were sent to various hospitals
500AGL is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 17:56
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 'oop North
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAR Bloke - and where would you take all those casualties in your SK? Do you think that maybe rather than dropping them all on one hospital's lap it may just be smarter to spread them around at the various trauma units in the region so no one department gets overwhelmed?

And would you just sit there in your SK waiting until all six / seven casualties had been extracted from the minibus before taking them off to your hospital of choice? Not really the best approach for people requiring urgent treatment is it?

Multiple helicopters means that the casualties can be flown out as soon as they are extracted and stabilised, to a suitable hospital which has capacity to handle them at that time.

I'm sure that if the other AAs were unavailable, Lec would have got a call. As it is, the situation was handled very competently by YAS and no assistance was required. If the minibus had crashed at sea, in the mountains or at night I'm sure you boys would have been called. It didn't, you weren't.
Flaxton Flyer is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 18:08
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny Scotland
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If the minibus had crashed at sea, in the mountains or at night I'm sure you boys would have been called. It didn't, you weren't
And that attitude demonstrates the crux of the problem. RAF SAR is just as capable of treating casualties by the roadside as they are in other environments. If the minibus had crashed at sea, in the mountains or at night then I'm sure you boys would have given it a go first and then asked for help when you realised you couldn't do it
SAR Bloke is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 18:28
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: london
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A helicopter has never treated a patient. It carries people and equipment that may treat patients. The amount of equipment in a HEMS aircraft is greater than in a SAR helicopter.

Horses for courses.

In fact with a major incident HEMS role is primarily to deliver medical staff if they cannot travel by road - don't know if that applies here - and possibly to extract specific patients such as head injured patients who need to go to a regional neurosurgical centre as opposed to the receiving centre.

Using multiple receiving hospitals sounds good but with this number of casualties is often unnecessary and indeed disruptive to the NHS such that it is contraindicated.

I suspect the controllers played safe ( possibly over reacted) at the initial call as the number of casualties and the injuries didn't justify this response. Of course HEMS is free to the ambulance services
homonculus is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 18:45
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny Scotland
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The amount of equipment in a HEMS aircraft is greater than in a SAR helicopter.
This is a genuine question. What is carried in a HEMS aircraft that isn't carried in a SAR aircraft?

Also I'd like to add that my previous post was intentionally flippant in response to Flaxton Flyer's post and not what I actually think. It's just exceptionally frustrating when you have an aircraft and crew (often with a fully trained and civilian registered paramedic) on call and you're not asked to help out when an incident like this occurs in your area.
SAR Bloke is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2013, 18:56
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UKdom
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SAR Bloke - A doctor (often useful for RSIs!), morphine, ketamine, autopulse CPR machine might be a few regular additions to HEMS over SAR?

Can a SeaKing land at LGI? (genuine question as I'm unsure).

Homonculus - not really an over reaction given the number of casualties (25!) Ambulances are also generally restricted to take the patient to the nearest centre for treatment (so they are freed up). Air Ambulances have the benefit of being able to choose the most appropriate centre (and in this case help spread the work around so as many patients get access to the best treatment instead of lining the corridor of one hospital waiting for a rather manic theatre crew to work through them all.

Serious bus/coach accidents are often renowned for serious injuries as passengers seldom wear seatbelts and quickly become exposed to sharp metal, broken glass and tarmac at speeds up to 60mph. Not nice.

SAR = Search And Rescue
HEMS = Helicopter Emergency Medical Service

They knew where the bus was...
misterbonkers is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.