Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Agustawestland signs contracts in UK, Azerbaijan €435M

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Agustawestland signs contracts in UK, Azerbaijan €435M

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Dec 2012, 15:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,122
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Agustawestland signs contracts in UK, Azerbaijan €435M

Nice for the UK.

Ministry of Defence awards £285m Sea King contract to AgustaWestland - Telegraph

Azerbaijan Airlines Orders Ten AgustaWestland Helicopters | AgustaWestland


Edited to add link

Last edited by Pittsextra; 20th Dec 2012 at 15:33.
Pittsextra is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2012, 18:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I love the bit where the SeaKing is being replaced by the Merlin. Let's see now:

Net loss of SeaKings: Approx 100+ airframes.
Net gain of Merlins: Approx 30? (any takers).

Cost of running a SeaKing/hour: Approx £10,000.
Cost of running a Merlin/hour: Approx £ [It's got to be £50-60,000 hasn't it?]

The bit I like best (inside the industry) is for every hour the 40yr old SeaKing flies, it costs 10hrs maintenance downtime.
For the same with Merlins, it's 50hrs downtime.

Spot the serviceable Merlin
Thomas coupling is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2012, 18:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
£285,000,000 for maintenance and technical "support"? I presume this does not include front line maintenance? This works out at £1.5m per airframe per year until 2016. If you needed a reason for SAR H, this comes near the top.
JB-123 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 13:36
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,122
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
I am sure we can look forward to picking the thing apart in the coming years as we have our own Canadian moment.
Pittsextra is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 15:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
JB - SKIOS is mostly about front-line maintenance and, since the quality from depth has been reduced (more contractorisation and KPI hoop-jumping), the amount of work completed on the front line has increased massively.

I think more will be needed on current performance to see the SK through to 2016.

If you needed a reason for power by the hour for military SAR, this comes at the top!

Last edited by [email protected]; 21st Dec 2012 at 15:23.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 15:46
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,122
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Crab why is the government seemingly making such a meal out of SAR. Working on a principle of if it isn't broken don't fix it, new kit aside why change the current mil role in SAR??
Pittsextra is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 15:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,960
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Pittsextra
Crab why is the government seemingly making such a meal out of SAR. Working on a principle of if it isn't broken don't fix it, new kit aside why change the current mil role in SAR??




"Use the search, Luke. Use the search."
Bravo73 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 15:54
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,122
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Ha - yes of course having posted looking at the thread below this one explains all... although really the money argument is hollow given it just shifts the burden off the balance sheet and becomes more P&L.
Pittsextra is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 15:59
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pittsextra, can you think of an easier way to chop a branch of the military so effectively without the public smelling a rat?????
Thomas coupling is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 16:00
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,122
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
I guess. Sadly.
Pittsextra is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 16:35
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Royal Leamington Spa
Age: 78
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We shouldn't give up so easily on losing SAR to civvy street operators.

Can we arrange a thousand pilots and engineers to march on the MoD!
Anthony Supplebottom is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 17:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Pitts - political dogma added to some historical empire-building by the previous head of the MCA. Add in the MoD blinkered approach to anything that isn't war-fighting and you have the perfect recipe for an expensive waste of taxpayer's money that won't provide any better (or even equal in some people's view) service.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 20:28
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: England
Posts: 39
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SKIOS

Crab

The only forward (as opposed to front line) maintenance that SKIOS is involved in is in SAR delivery. Actually the bulk of SKIOS is depth (on & off aircraft) maintenance and logistic and technical services.
Nicholas Howard is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.