New Helicopter Forum Section
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was initially for the idea - but after reading SASless post I've just about changed my mind, just one thing.
What needs to be changed is the description (A haven for professional helicopter pilots to discuss the things that affect them) - it comes down to the word "professional", there seems to be an increasing number of individuals who seem to think you can only post in Rotorheads if you have tens of thousands of hours logged - this is no longer the case, Rotorheads is a place for all types in the rotary world.
A number of Pros don't like the "basic" questions being posted. This leads to helicopter based questions being posted in the "Private Flying" section, which is completely wrong and defeats the purpose of a single heli forum - especially as the poster will miss out on vital advice, or more importantly lifesaving advice from those with more experience !
Splitting the forum into Commercial and Private is one option - but we then lose the relationship between the two types, which Rotorheads did/should have!
What needs to be changed is the description (A haven for professional helicopter pilots to discuss the things that affect them) - it comes down to the word "professional", there seems to be an increasing number of individuals who seem to think you can only post in Rotorheads if you have tens of thousands of hours logged - this is no longer the case, Rotorheads is a place for all types in the rotary world.
A number of Pros don't like the "basic" questions being posted. This leads to helicopter based questions being posted in the "Private Flying" section, which is completely wrong and defeats the purpose of a single heli forum - especially as the poster will miss out on vital advice, or more importantly lifesaving advice from those with more experience !
Splitting the forum into Commercial and Private is one option - but we then lose the relationship between the two types, which Rotorheads did/should have!
.. it comes down to the word "professional", there seems to be an increasing number of individuals who seem to think you can only post in Rotorheads if you have tens of thousands of hours logged.
While on the matter of forum labelling I have to say that I would be far more comfortable if Rotorheads were badged as "A Haven for Helicopter Professionals .." as opposed to pilots exclusively. Where would the pilots be without the mechanics, and the mechanics without the manufacturers technical support and all of us without seasoned aviation staff in a host of disciplines ranging from admin through to ops. Indeed this rationale applies equally to the very title PPRuNe .. but to keep reinforcing this 'pilot exclusivity' seems unnecessary given that so many additional professional aviation specialisations participate in Rotorheads.
I may be wrong.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As some of you will know, I was the Moderator of this forum from 2000 -2007. During that time, there were suggestions every couple of years that Rotorheads should have sub-forums. If there had been sufficient support, I would have arranged it. There never was.
Neither necessary nor desirable IMHO: Rotorheads is primarily a forum for professional pilots.
Most of the regular contributors are professionals but PPLs and student-pilots have always been made welcome and are free to ask questions and learn.
Others involved in the industry, engineers for example, post regularly and make valuable contributions.
The forum has a well-established ethos: It's a friendly 'crew-room' where we discuss everything from helicopter ops to highly technical topics, enjoy a laugh, have the occasional row and willingly help each other - which includes people with enormous experience and expertise helping PPLs and student pilots who wish to learn.
An 'increasing number' is obviously relative. I don't believe there's a problem. PPLs and student-pilots post regularly.
Over the years, there were entirely justified complaints from professionals about beginners constantly asking questions that had already been asked and answered endless times. We reduced that problem significantly by having the 'So you want to be a Helicopter Pilot' sticky at the top of the forum but, even if it was in flashing lights, some newbies would still post without reading it.
R22 questions and discussions have, for some time, been kept in one place as far as practicably possible: 'The R22 Corner'. There's bound to be some delay before threads are merged – all PRuNe Mods are volunteers who do the job in their spare time.
Things do get a little heated between the Pros and the PPLs from time to time; they always have. I no longer monitor the forum closely but, when I did, more often than not it wasn't the fault of the Pros – they occasionally became exasperated by the sort of PPLs who think they know as much as the professionals and argue instead of learning.
The single forum formula works. Rotorheads grew into one of the busiest forums on PPRuNe, one of the two biggest helicopter forums on the internet, and the biggest international forum with members working in a wide variety of ops all over the world.
Those who’ve joined in recent years might find it hard to believe but, in 2000, it was good going if the number of posts on a thread reached double figures, the number of views per thread didn't reach three figures very often and the number of people on the forum at any one time never exceeded very low double figures. (There are over 300 as I write this.)
These two threads from 2000 illustrate the point: Drying Paint and Dead Forum
It's no longer my decision but, if it was, I'd keep it as it is.
H.
What needs to be changed is the description
Most of the regular contributors are professionals but PPLs and student-pilots have always been made welcome and are free to ask questions and learn.
Others involved in the industry, engineers for example, post regularly and make valuable contributions.
The forum has a well-established ethos: It's a friendly 'crew-room' where we discuss everything from helicopter ops to highly technical topics, enjoy a laugh, have the occasional row and willingly help each other - which includes people with enormous experience and expertise helping PPLs and student pilots who wish to learn.
there seems to be an increasing number of individuals who seem to think you can only post in Rotorheads if you have tens of thousands of hours logged.
Over the years, there were entirely justified complaints from professionals about beginners constantly asking questions that had already been asked and answered endless times. We reduced that problem significantly by having the 'So you want to be a Helicopter Pilot' sticky at the top of the forum but, even if it was in flashing lights, some newbies would still post without reading it.
R22 questions and discussions have, for some time, been kept in one place as far as practicably possible: 'The R22 Corner'. There's bound to be some delay before threads are merged – all PRuNe Mods are volunteers who do the job in their spare time.
Things do get a little heated between the Pros and the PPLs from time to time; they always have. I no longer monitor the forum closely but, when I did, more often than not it wasn't the fault of the Pros – they occasionally became exasperated by the sort of PPLs who think they know as much as the professionals and argue instead of learning.
The single forum formula works. Rotorheads grew into one of the busiest forums on PPRuNe, one of the two biggest helicopter forums on the internet, and the biggest international forum with members working in a wide variety of ops all over the world.
Those who’ve joined in recent years might find it hard to believe but, in 2000, it was good going if the number of posts on a thread reached double figures, the number of views per thread didn't reach three figures very often and the number of people on the forum at any one time never exceeded very low double figures. (There are over 300 as I write this.)
These two threads from 2000 illustrate the point: Drying Paint and Dead Forum
It's no longer my decision but, if it was, I'd keep it as it is.
H.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cornwall
Age: 75
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The last post ?
As I began the debate and if, as heliport says this subject crops up every now and again, maybe on this occasion I can end it.
OK - so I have been persuaded that things should remain as they are. But I will have a soft spot in my heart for those unfortunates that mistakenly post on those other fora that are frequented by strange plank driving people who don't have any interest in things rotary and by learning the hard way they will henceforth ignore them and post directly on Rotorheads.
G.
OK - so I have been persuaded that things should remain as they are. But I will have a soft spot in my heart for those unfortunates that mistakenly post on those other fora that are frequented by strange plank driving people who don't have any interest in things rotary and by learning the hard way they will henceforth ignore them and post directly on Rotorheads.
G.
Savoia....I agree the Mechanics/Engineers should definitely be part of Rotorheads as they are very much the backbone of the industry. Pilots can fly the machines only so long before they go U/S for defects, Inspections, and TBO requirements. Their input and arguments would be informative reading (assuming we could be satisifed with limiting ourselves to monosyllabic words).
They would be much easier to seek out for answers when we. who decided to work with our hands instead of our brains, have questions about the technical aspects of our aircraft and its care and feeding.
Treading into the Engineers Tea Room as a Pilot has always been a dicey thing to do. Perhaps we might find a way to lure them into this one.
They would be much easier to seek out for answers when we. who decided to work with our hands instead of our brains, have questions about the technical aspects of our aircraft and its care and feeding.
Treading into the Engineers Tea Room as a Pilot has always been a dicey thing to do. Perhaps we might find a way to lure them into this one.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Land of damp and drizzle
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Speaking as someone working one's way up into and through the professional ranks, I've always found it really useful that rotorheads has such a mix. I've met great people, seen shining examples and dire warnings, had plenty of encouragement, and learned a lot. I tend to check prooon in spare moments around doing other things, so it's nice to have everything in one place - splitting it out into sub-fora would probably mean I'd miss stuff. So another vote for the status quo.
Given the leanings towards maintaining the status quo (as mentioned above) what would be useful in a single-forum set-up such as Rotorheads is if the number of threads per page were increased from the current 25 (not including stickys) to say 35 or 40. This would enable those dropping-in for a quick glance to access more topics more easily.
Its not that selecting "page 2" or more is in anyway difficult but I am reaonably confident that there are those who, with limited available time, simply glance at "page one" to see what's new. Slightly longer pages would offer a wider selection of topics more conveniently.
.
Its not that selecting "page 2" or more is in anyway difficult but I am reaonably confident that there are those who, with limited available time, simply glance at "page one" to see what's new. Slightly longer pages would offer a wider selection of topics more conveniently.
.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: bora scirocco
Age: 50
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also support old format. KIS method - keep it simple, the best way always for me. I saw many different forums but I've never liked many closed corners or ghetos with only one or two topics... This is quite enough for such a small helicopter community in the world. Very efficient, open and fast.
Regards from Middle Europe.
Regards from Middle Europe.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cornwall
Age: 75
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes but.....
...... you are all missing the point. Of course it's the best helicopter forum on the web but raise your eyes a little and there are fora that beg your attention - Instructors and examiners, military flying etc etc. but don't let that siren call steal your post for it will lie forlornly unanswered for we are the Homo Sapiens in a world full of Neandertals. They (FW chappies) don't understand us and they cannot respond to discussions about our world. We need a sign that says HELICOPTER STUFF HERE - DONT POST ELSEWHERE.
Good threads can be lost if we don't remind the unfamiliar that although it does not say so, ALL the other threads (like the FAA CAA and all other NAAs) have a built-in fixed wing majority and bias.
G
Good threads can be lost if we don't remind the unfamiliar that although it does not say so, ALL the other threads (like the FAA CAA and all other NAAs) have a built-in fixed wing majority and bias.
G
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Savoia
Leanings?
It's almost horizontal.
You can select the number of threads you wish to see per page (up to 40) in User Control Panel.
H.
Given the leanings towards maintaining the status quo (as mentioned above) what would be useful in a single-forum set-up such as Rotorheads is if the number of threads per page were increased from the current 25 (not including stickys) to say 35 or 40.
It's almost horizontal.
You can select the number of threads you wish to see per page (up to 40) in User Control Panel.
H.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: bora scirocco
Age: 50
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know, but I think that you can always open a
new thread like "Instructors & examiners" or "'military corner" and there you can discuss about everything you want ...because if you "move" that somewhere on the side, half of people will never open that gheto, after that seems like you have two separate helicopter forums, some chemistry is lost. That's experience from my country... Now it's better, I Like this way.
But, its only my opinion.
new thread like "Instructors & examiners" or "'military corner" and there you can discuss about everything you want ...because if you "move" that somewhere on the side, half of people will never open that gheto, after that seems like you have two separate helicopter forums, some chemistry is lost. That's experience from my country... Now it's better, I Like this way.
But, its only my opinion.
Like most others, I like the current system - but mainly because I tend to dip in most days (and several times a day). It is the eclectic nature of Rotorheads that makes it attractive to most followers. However, for infrequent readers/contributors, a more hierarchical schema might be more practical.
What might be useful is to extend a organisation/practice that is in use - the mods have established dedicated threads for: aircraft types; photographs; videos etc. Perhaps this practice could be extended to a number of the other categories that were mentioned by Geoff. If merited, these could be retained on the font page with a judicious use of sticky's. Additionally, if they are originated by the mods, they will also be persistent.
It might be preferable to have a thread naming convention - thus avoiding multiple threads on the same subject and the lucky-dip approach (although the subject of most threads can (usually) be discerned from the first post).
Jim
What might be useful is to extend a organisation/practice that is in use - the mods have established dedicated threads for: aircraft types; photographs; videos etc. Perhaps this practice could be extended to a number of the other categories that were mentioned by Geoff. If merited, these could be retained on the font page with a judicious use of sticky's. Additionally, if they are originated by the mods, they will also be persistent.
It might be preferable to have a thread naming convention - thus avoiding multiple threads on the same subject and the lucky-dip approach (although the subject of most threads can (usually) be discerned from the first post).
Jim
Chief Bottle Washer
While on the matter of forum labelling I have to say that I would be far more comfortable if Rotorheads were badged as "A Haven for Helicopter Professionals .." as opposed to pilots exclusively. Where would the pilots be without the mechanics, and the mechanics without the manufacturers technical support and all of us without seasoned aviation staff in a host of disciplines ranging from admin through to ops.
The success of "Rotorheads" is in no small part owed to the wisdom of Heliport....as he provided a steady and judicious hand in his Moderation of the Forum. I know it was his genius and not just merely his good looks and charm that helped bring us to the point we are here.
If he had seen the benefit of making a change....it would have happened.
I would hate to see the basis of the success of this Forum undone by making major changes to the format.
For Heliport and Senior Pilot.....in consideration of their efforts....
If he had seen the benefit of making a change....it would have happened.
I would hate to see the basis of the success of this Forum undone by making major changes to the format.
For Heliport and Senior Pilot.....in consideration of their efforts....
I'm with all y'all.
I think we should leave it as a single forum but maybe with a broader description. Many PPL and private owners provide welcome contributions and in turn benefit from some great wisdom from contributors who are professionals. Many of us have 20-30 years in the industry and should encourage those who will be the industry's future.
I think we should leave it as a single forum but maybe with a broader description. Many PPL and private owners provide welcome contributions and in turn benefit from some great wisdom from contributors who are professionals. Many of us have 20-30 years in the industry and should encourage those who will be the industry's future.
One observes that our intrepid Moderator Signore Pilota Superiore has re-badged the forum so that it now reads .. "A Haven for Helicopter Professionals .." as opposed to pilots exclusively!
When I PM'd SP offering my congratulations on this advancement he responded as follows:
Well, anyway well done SP.
And I suppose .. welcome to the new 'all inclusive' Rotorheads!!!
The New Rotorheads: (L-R) Pilots, ATCO's, Mechanics
When I PM'd SP offering my congratulations on this advancement he responded as follows:
There's actually a bit of a story behind this as just prior to the Queen's trip to the Heads of Commonwealth Summit I happened to visit the palace for tea (as one does) when HM began explaining to me her intention to reverse Britain's historic laws of primogeniture. Long story short - I encouraged HM by telling her that here on Rotorheads we would be doing something similar, not debunking primogeniture but the ancient rite of prima donnas!
And I suppose .. welcome to the new 'all inclusive' Rotorheads!!!
The New Rotorheads: (L-R) Pilots, ATCO's, Mechanics
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canterbury
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most of the regular contributors are professionals
Why should this forum just be for professionals and pilots?
What about all the other people involved in Helicopters?
What needs to be changed is the description (A haven for professional helicopter pilots to discuss the things that affect them) - it comes down to the word "professional", there seems to be an increasing number of individuals who seem to think you can only post in Rotorheads if you have tens of thousands of hours logged - this is no longer the case, Rotorheads is a place for all types in the rotary world.