Autorotation technique.
I would like to see a source for this 1000ft hypothesis
Leading up to that, there will be various variables that take a while to settle down, as he's already described above.
That's not the same as saying you can't fly a proper auto from pretty much anywhere up the transition slope, or anywhere really - you just have to judge how much flare and how much lever lowering you can do.
Obviously from a decent height you can get the collective down, flare to achieve your desired speed, stabilise at a constant rate of descent and have a cup of tea on the way down, but from lower down you won't necessarily be able to do all those things. You may have speed that you can trade for extra potential, maybe not.
As you'll note, E86 has mentioned things like the delay involved in your brain processing what's happened, during which the Nr is decaying like a bastard. Hughes500, you obviously got the lever down quick and did what you had to do, but that's not to say everyone would. The other thing to keep in mind is that he's only talking about being established in full blown stable autorotation, not just in a position where you can pull off a landing, if you get my drift.
Arm
As an experiment today flew with a customer who had not flown for 14 months. Flew at 1000 ft agl over airfield ,70 kts in a 300C. I chopped the throttle with no prior warning. Customer ( tt 70 hours, not trained by me)dumped lever as ac yawed about 40 degrees to the left. RRPM down below red line about 380 rpm. He flared back with the cylic bringing rrpm back to about 410 rpm by 800 ft and 50 kts. By 600 ft the ac was rrpm of 480 rate of descent 1600 ft per minute, fully stabilised autorotation.
So I am afraid I do not understand where 1000 ft comes from, unless an R22 is the subject of 1000 ft . If that is the case I will eat humble pie and offer a sincere apology
As an experiment today flew with a customer who had not flown for 14 months. Flew at 1000 ft agl over airfield ,70 kts in a 300C. I chopped the throttle with no prior warning. Customer ( tt 70 hours, not trained by me)dumped lever as ac yawed about 40 degrees to the left. RRPM down below red line about 380 rpm. He flared back with the cylic bringing rrpm back to about 410 rpm by 800 ft and 50 kts. By 600 ft the ac was rrpm of 480 rate of descent 1600 ft per minute, fully stabilised autorotation.
So I am afraid I do not understand where 1000 ft comes from, unless an R22 is the subject of 1000 ft . If that is the case I will eat humble pie and offer a sincere apology
Fair enough mate, I haven't done any autos recently, although I've done heaps to touchdown in the past from many different setups.
When doing maintenance test flying in Hueys we would get set up 1000 ft above the test altitude to enter auto to ensure everything was stable to note the Nr when passing through that altitude. It was part of the test flight schedule so I guess there's something in it taking perhaps that much height to get totally stable to the nth degree.
Having said that, starting from say 1000 AGL on a straight-in auto, you're certainly comfortably established in autorotation and waiting for flare height to come up after two or three hundred feet or so, so yeah, who knows.
When doing maintenance test flying in Hueys we would get set up 1000 ft above the test altitude to enter auto to ensure everything was stable to note the Nr when passing through that altitude. It was part of the test flight schedule so I guess there's something in it taking perhaps that much height to get totally stable to the nth degree.
Having said that, starting from say 1000 AGL on a straight-in auto, you're certainly comfortably established in autorotation and waiting for flare height to come up after two or three hundred feet or so, so yeah, who knows.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
don't know where i got this 300' of airspace thing from been carrying it around without testing the idea for some time.
just now (one up R22 almost full fuel) experimented starting from Straight and level at about 150 feet using fence posts as measure markers. from cruise at 21" to established in auto descending flight it was 250 metres.
just now (one up R22 almost full fuel) experimented starting from Straight and level at about 150 feet using fence posts as measure markers. from cruise at 21" to established in auto descending flight it was 250 metres.
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Philadelphia PA
Age: 73
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
eagle86
You will not have any risk of losing the rotor in a Bell with an aft cyclic movement, unless you know something the rest of us don't know.
Abrupt forward movement is a problem, but aft???
Please explain.
In a Bell 206 it takes less than 300' for the rotor RPM to get back into the green from a hovering engine failure (at a high enough altitude, obviously). Done it many times when teaching the H-V curve.
You will not have any risk of losing the rotor in a Bell with an aft cyclic movement, unless you know something the rest of us don't know.
Abrupt forward movement is a problem, but aft???
Please explain.
In a Bell 206 it takes less than 300' for the rotor RPM to get back into the green from a hovering engine failure (at a high enough altitude, obviously). Done it many times when teaching the H-V curve.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1000ft is total rubish.
You can start an auto at 100kts/50ft and be fully stabilised in time to make a landing, equally from 1000ft using minimum height loss technique you can be stabilised after about 50ft of descent if you are smooth.
Autorotation can be established almost instantaneously by pulling back the cyclic. This can be shown by the need to contain Nr.
If Nr rises by itself, then you are in auto.
Rate of descent is totally unimportant, only AoA relative to the disc matters.
There is absolutely no need for any descent to occur to be in auto.
You can start an auto at 100kts/50ft and be fully stabilised in time to make a landing, equally from 1000ft using minimum height loss technique you can be stabilised after about 50ft of descent if you are smooth.
Autorotation can be established almost instantaneously by pulling back the cyclic. This can be shown by the need to contain Nr.
If Nr rises by itself, then you are in auto.
Rate of descent is totally unimportant, only AoA relative to the disc matters.
There is absolutely no need for any descent to occur to be in auto.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Correspondents appear to believe that I am saying you can't pull of a successful landing following an engine failure from any where - go back to my original post - I have carried out many thousands of engine off landings from any of those scenarios successfully. However, as an example, I can assure you that a loss of power from an IGE hover or an OGE hover almost anywhere inside the HV curve the rotor system will NOT be in fully developed autorotation before you need to pull pitch to cushion the landing. Let's not get too pedantic the height loss maybe say 800 feet for fully developed aerodynamically stable autorotation but stable aerodynamic autorotation is not instantaneous. As AOW stated when carrying out an auto rev check test flight the auto was commenced at least 1000 feet above test height to ensure fully developed stable autorotation was achieved by that test height.
A word on underslung teetering heads - years ago the service I was attached to suffered two fatal accidents, four pilots lost, as a result of main rotor separation - one flight was simulated IF which was to include UA recovery. The other was a two ship low level tactical formation. Somehow these pilots pulled the rotor heads off - there was no sign of a pre-existing failure. A senior Bell test pilot was invited to discuss the aerodynamics of this system. He emphasised that extreme care should be taken with cyclic movement with anything less than optimum RRPM particularly at less than 1G - exactly where you will be should you drop the lever after an unalerted power loss.
When constructing the HV curve manufacturers take into account many factors including pilot reaction time - low inertia/high inertia rotor system to name a couple. The result is the avoid curve - in other words avoid flying in this zone as we don't guarantee a successful landing following a sudden power loss.
GAGS
E86
A word on underslung teetering heads - years ago the service I was attached to suffered two fatal accidents, four pilots lost, as a result of main rotor separation - one flight was simulated IF which was to include UA recovery. The other was a two ship low level tactical formation. Somehow these pilots pulled the rotor heads off - there was no sign of a pre-existing failure. A senior Bell test pilot was invited to discuss the aerodynamics of this system. He emphasised that extreme care should be taken with cyclic movement with anything less than optimum RRPM particularly at less than 1G - exactly where you will be should you drop the lever after an unalerted power loss.
When constructing the HV curve manufacturers take into account many factors including pilot reaction time - low inertia/high inertia rotor system to name a couple. The result is the avoid curve - in other words avoid flying in this zone as we don't guarantee a successful landing following a sudden power loss.
GAGS
E86
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ventura Ca U.S.A.
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From what I read here,You all have a Big gap in what H/V tests are and how to use the controls and height /air speed to carry out a secessful power failure (autorotation), In Not just one but any of the different types of helicopters supplied to a pilot. Sad so sad.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
eagle86
What is this "aerodynamic autorotation" you are talking about?
Autorotation is an aerodynamic effect. We call it "autorotation"
There is no other form of autorotation.
I have flown Seaking/Wessex/Gazelle/Squirrel/UH1/AB212/S70B/Mi17 and none of them require anything like the height you talk about even from OGE hover.
Yes from a hover you will lose significant height if you try to regain speed, but that is nothing to do with autorotation, that is just trading height for speed. Autorotation is very quick to take effect. Try an over aggressive fast-stop and watch how quick the Nr gets excited.
What is this "aerodynamic autorotation" you are talking about?
Autorotation is an aerodynamic effect. We call it "autorotation"
There is no other form of autorotation.
I have flown Seaking/Wessex/Gazelle/Squirrel/UH1/AB212/S70B/Mi17 and none of them require anything like the height you talk about even from OGE hover.
Yes from a hover you will lose significant height if you try to regain speed, but that is nothing to do with autorotation, that is just trading height for speed. Autorotation is very quick to take effect. Try an over aggressive fast-stop and watch how quick the Nr gets excited.
Could you explain what you just wrote a bit more clearly, hillberg? I don't get what you're on about.
Are you trying to say that no-one who's posted here knows how to do a successful auto? That's what it sounds like, and if so, you're way off the mark.
Are you trying to say that no-one who's posted here knows how to do a successful auto? That's what it sounds like, and if so, you're way off the mark.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ventura Ca U.S.A.
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hit the books, Every helicopter handles a little differently than another, From Low Gross weight/High gross, Air speed and all the other stuff that you take in account for a safe flight. From the little R-22, and the Hughes 269 to the S-58. If you are flying with such a gap in knowlage required that you are asking a Forum a question "Why aft cyclic in the start of an autorotation" Get your money back from that "Instructor". What you don't know will kill you. Learn & live.
I'm not asking that question, and before shooting from the hip you would be well advised to read the original post at the start of this thread.
There's a lot of knowledge and experience here, and I think we're all well aware of when to use cyclic in an auto.
Do you always need aft cyclic entering auto? Of course not, it depends on the situation, so go back and read what everyone's said before pontificating.
Ever flown a fixed float-equipped Bell 205 or 206? You need a bunch of forward cyclic entering auto to stop them tipping over backwards, which is what would happen if you applied aft cyclic because of all the extra surface area forward of the C of G that wants to pitch you up like crazy as the rate of descent builds up.
There's a lot of knowledge and experience here, and I think we're all well aware of when to use cyclic in an auto.
Do you always need aft cyclic entering auto? Of course not, it depends on the situation, so go back and read what everyone's said before pontificating.
Ever flown a fixed float-equipped Bell 205 or 206? You need a bunch of forward cyclic entering auto to stop them tipping over backwards, which is what would happen if you applied aft cyclic because of all the extra surface area forward of the C of G that wants to pitch you up like crazy as the rate of descent builds up.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
eagle.
I have no idea what you are refering to.
Lower the lever until the aerodynamic forces have an accelerating effect on the NR.
You are now in auto.
End of.
You can now turn off the engines and pull wingovers and bunts and spot turns or accelerate to Vmax to your hearts content as long as you raise or lower the lever to maintain Nr in the correct bracket.
You are just plain wrong about needing many hundreds of feet to establish in a stable datum type auto.
I have no idea what you are refering to.
Lower the lever until the aerodynamic forces have an accelerating effect on the NR.
You are now in auto.
End of.
You can now turn off the engines and pull wingovers and bunts and spot turns or accelerate to Vmax to your hearts content as long as you raise or lower the lever to maintain Nr in the correct bracket.
You are just plain wrong about needing many hundreds of feet to establish in a stable datum type auto.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Hillberg,
Perhaps you could help explain procedures for a couple of scenarios from your books?
1. Peter pilot is loitering around at 180 to 250 feet agl at around 10 to 25 knots IAS, moderate timber being 35 to 45 feet. Winds light and variable.
Captain Peter is scanning, scanning for the elusive bovine or etc. Silly sod is concentrating on the bovines, the job, the local bosses daughter, the next pi**up or something - and not thinking about the inevitable - if the noise stops. It does, what does he do with the cyclic and collective?
2. Captain Peter is a silly sod, with the same wind, the very next day he is tooling along at about four feet AGL over an open clay pan at high cruise speed, despite being told many times as a newbie last year not to, and after a great yard up or a great night with the bosses daughter or a splendid night on the turps, inflated with his own ego, and all of the above, at about 1200 hours experience (the most dangerous for mustering pilots) and - not thinking about the inevitable - and dammit the noise stops. What should he do with the collective and cyclic?
This will be any light helicopter 12E, '47, 269 or the fabled 22. He might even be in a 44 or a 206.
Regards.
TET
Perhaps you could help explain procedures for a couple of scenarios from your books?
1. Peter pilot is loitering around at 180 to 250 feet agl at around 10 to 25 knots IAS, moderate timber being 35 to 45 feet. Winds light and variable.
Captain Peter is scanning, scanning for the elusive bovine or etc. Silly sod is concentrating on the bovines, the job, the local bosses daughter, the next pi**up or something - and not thinking about the inevitable - if the noise stops. It does, what does he do with the cyclic and collective?
2. Captain Peter is a silly sod, with the same wind, the very next day he is tooling along at about four feet AGL over an open clay pan at high cruise speed, despite being told many times as a newbie last year not to, and after a great yard up or a great night with the bosses daughter or a splendid night on the turps, inflated with his own ego, and all of the above, at about 1200 hours experience (the most dangerous for mustering pilots) and - not thinking about the inevitable - and dammit the noise stops. What should he do with the collective and cyclic?
This will be any light helicopter 12E, '47, 269 or the fabled 22. He might even be in a 44 or a 206.
Regards.
TET
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ventura Ca U.S.A.
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#1 Dump the collective and keep what RPM you have left , pull collective just above the tops of the trees and take the ride down through the branches. Keep the descent vertical as the nose of any helicopter will offer no protection,Let the structure do its job,Been there done this.(no trees)
#2 aft cyclic a little and let air speed become a little altitude and (bump) and then lower the collective a little to keep the tail rotor from hitting the ground (ARMY NOE TRICK) & keeping what RPM that will be needed for the tuochdown. Been there twice.
At cruise speed the 269 auto target is at your toes,The 206 is just above the lower windshild frame,The R-22 at 70 mph you can "ballon" and do a second auto to a new spot. The Brantley can finnish an auto with out adding collective at the bottom. and In a good stiff wind the Bell47 will float in the bottom for 300+ feet @.13" above the ground.
As for floats the tunaboat job as fun. As for the R-44 beter have the Bladders installed. Fire sucks.
A poor Peter pilot should allways fly with a way out,A keep his mind on flying. I like it use "What If?" & RPM is life.
#2 aft cyclic a little and let air speed become a little altitude and (bump) and then lower the collective a little to keep the tail rotor from hitting the ground (ARMY NOE TRICK) & keeping what RPM that will be needed for the tuochdown. Been there twice.
At cruise speed the 269 auto target is at your toes,The 206 is just above the lower windshild frame,The R-22 at 70 mph you can "ballon" and do a second auto to a new spot. The Brantley can finnish an auto with out adding collective at the bottom. and In a good stiff wind the Bell47 will float in the bottom for 300+ feet @.13" above the ground.
As for floats the tunaboat job as fun. As for the R-44 beter have the Bladders installed. Fire sucks.
A poor Peter pilot should allways fly with a way out,A keep his mind on flying. I like it use "What If?" & RPM is life.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tourist,
I guess your public profile says a lot about you. Mate, I can't help you. Let me know where and when you intend to conduct your next autorotational display - I'd like to come and watch - from a safe distance!
GAGS
E86
I guess your public profile says a lot about you. Mate, I can't help you. Let me know where and when you intend to conduct your next autorotational display - I'd like to come and watch - from a safe distance!
GAGS
E86
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting hillberg, those books; I think they miss a bit of detail.
#1 Yep RPM is life no question.
Another one is knowing your winds even when you are sound asleep in bed. Getting down quickly and arresting the ROD into wind is far easier than doing it downwind. Even 2 to 3 knots is significant. No such thing as Light and Variable when your world is around the tree tops, I am sorry, but that was a planted clue.
Another clue was 'moderate' timber, reads “enough room to get the hull down straight and let the blades chew their way down”. Trunks up to five inches are OK even in a R22.
Conduct the auto to the ground, the collective control will be useless after the first decent strike but the blades will be absorbing energy like you wouldn’t believe and slowing everything down. The cross tubes may bend but you should be able to undo and step out, been there seen that.
I do not believe that to pull pitch and run out of RPM at the 25’ tree tops is a good idea, we have seen a couple of deaths from overpitching here lately, from about that height. You need that energy of RPM to use against the timber to slow down ROD.
Firstly as you say get that lever down pronto, at the same time point the cyclic directly at the spot you have already subconsciously been aware of. That sub conscious awareness as much into wind as possible, must be demonstrated prior to a low level and mustering sign off.
Get the cyclic back just before you go through the canopy. If it is into wind its forward airspeed will stop on a dime.
Forget the garbage about the low G danger to the head; the aircraft is only descending at the rate of one G. It is not in a low G push over manoeuvre, don’t forget that.
#2 There was a couple of clues here too. Notice how I changed the order of controls in the question and also a 1200 hour ego machine will not stop a machine descending at least one foot or more if it is a sudden and complete power loss like a free wheel slip.
So from anything under four foot skid height there will be no, y'll hear, NO REAR CYCLIC until the aircraft is cleared away from the ground to a safe T/R clearance height.
It is simple, a quick jerk on the collective, then start with your cyclic as you put the lever back down and then control RPM with the lever as you would in a quick stop.
Zoom it a bit if you like, maybe jump over an obstacle or some such, whatever you fancy, even a 180 can be accomplished with most types from twenty feet or so and a high cruise speed, to get back into wind. A G5 will do it from 65-70 knots in the width of an airstrip.
The thing is, in both instances the people that are usually going to be good at mustering are often a bit flamboyant, sometimes will take risks and can be counted on to forget, sometimes defy, instructions regardless in their early years. So, one solution to reduce risk is to teach the survival technique basics at an age when they usually remember the basics. Just like a young pup.
cheers tet
#1 Yep RPM is life no question.
Another one is knowing your winds even when you are sound asleep in bed. Getting down quickly and arresting the ROD into wind is far easier than doing it downwind. Even 2 to 3 knots is significant. No such thing as Light and Variable when your world is around the tree tops, I am sorry, but that was a planted clue.
Another clue was 'moderate' timber, reads “enough room to get the hull down straight and let the blades chew their way down”. Trunks up to five inches are OK even in a R22.
Conduct the auto to the ground, the collective control will be useless after the first decent strike but the blades will be absorbing energy like you wouldn’t believe and slowing everything down. The cross tubes may bend but you should be able to undo and step out, been there seen that.
I do not believe that to pull pitch and run out of RPM at the 25’ tree tops is a good idea, we have seen a couple of deaths from overpitching here lately, from about that height. You need that energy of RPM to use against the timber to slow down ROD.
Firstly as you say get that lever down pronto, at the same time point the cyclic directly at the spot you have already subconsciously been aware of. That sub conscious awareness as much into wind as possible, must be demonstrated prior to a low level and mustering sign off.
Get the cyclic back just before you go through the canopy. If it is into wind its forward airspeed will stop on a dime.
Forget the garbage about the low G danger to the head; the aircraft is only descending at the rate of one G. It is not in a low G push over manoeuvre, don’t forget that.
#2 There was a couple of clues here too. Notice how I changed the order of controls in the question and also a 1200 hour ego machine will not stop a machine descending at least one foot or more if it is a sudden and complete power loss like a free wheel slip.
So from anything under four foot skid height there will be no, y'll hear, NO REAR CYCLIC until the aircraft is cleared away from the ground to a safe T/R clearance height.
It is simple, a quick jerk on the collective, then start with your cyclic as you put the lever back down and then control RPM with the lever as you would in a quick stop.
Zoom it a bit if you like, maybe jump over an obstacle or some such, whatever you fancy, even a 180 can be accomplished with most types from twenty feet or so and a high cruise speed, to get back into wind. A G5 will do it from 65-70 knots in the width of an airstrip.
The thing is, in both instances the people that are usually going to be good at mustering are often a bit flamboyant, sometimes will take risks and can be counted on to forget, sometimes defy, instructions regardless in their early years. So, one solution to reduce risk is to teach the survival technique basics at an age when they usually remember the basics. Just like a young pup.
cheers tet
Last edited by topendtorque; 28th Oct 2011 at 11:04.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ventura Ca U.S.A.
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1. An unpowered rotor will NOT Chew its way down, The ROD will be as low as you can get it before entry in the tree tops. If you have time for in the wind I'm all for it , But adding forward cyclic will droop rpm- with a minimum of time you need to arrest the fall before the rotors are lost,After the blades are gone all control is lost and you become the battering ram at the front if any forward speed is left.
2. aft cyclic and bumping collective will rotate the aircraft attitude and raise the tail rotor clear. No aft cyclic? Some helicopters tuck on a power failure, It all depends on the way some helicopters handle.
3. Ty a right 180 auto then a left 180 auto-Tell the results.
The #1 rule is get home alive.
You have some good answers.
2. aft cyclic and bumping collective will rotate the aircraft attitude and raise the tail rotor clear. No aft cyclic? Some helicopters tuck on a power failure, It all depends on the way some helicopters handle.
3. Ty a right 180 auto then a left 180 auto-Tell the results.
The #1 rule is get home alive.
You have some good answers.