Looking for Feedback, AW139 & S-92
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: U.S.
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looking for Feedback, AW139 & S-92
Greetings Ppruners,
I'm considering applying with a major U.S. company to fly Gulf of Mexico IFR. I'm presently working in U.S. EMS as EC135 SPIFR, and am looking at this move because it pays more money, and I'd like the opportunity to fly a medium or large aircraft with more flying time and more regular IFR.
I'm looking into the possibility of flying one of two types, the AW139 or the S-92.
I'd like some feedback on both AW139 & S-92 safety, airworthiness directives, maintenance availability/dispatch reliability, utility in IFR operations, "pilot friendliness" with regard to noise levels, vibration, ergonomics...and any other general comments on these types from the perspective of an offshore pilot.
Thanks in advance for any comments and information.
--Arismount
I'm considering applying with a major U.S. company to fly Gulf of Mexico IFR. I'm presently working in U.S. EMS as EC135 SPIFR, and am looking at this move because it pays more money, and I'd like the opportunity to fly a medium or large aircraft with more flying time and more regular IFR.
I'm looking into the possibility of flying one of two types, the AW139 or the S-92.
I'd like some feedback on both AW139 & S-92 safety, airworthiness directives, maintenance availability/dispatch reliability, utility in IFR operations, "pilot friendliness" with regard to noise levels, vibration, ergonomics...and any other general comments on these types from the perspective of an offshore pilot.
Thanks in advance for any comments and information.
--Arismount
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cant answer about the statistics on availability ect. but I can tell you that the s92 is super noisy when avionics are on. takes forever to start up and shut down.
139 is as far as I know, not to bad noise wise. its a heavy helicopter = more noise. and there is the little snag of the ( I think ) 7 degress nose up in hover
139 is as far as I know, not to bad noise wise. its a heavy helicopter = more noise. and there is the little snag of the ( I think ) 7 degress nose up in hover
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Devon
Age: 49
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nose up
The 139 is more like 12-15 degrees nose up in hover but cannot really see it as a snag.
The 139 is a little noisy inside but nothing a good ANR headset would not fix. Cannot speak for the 92.
The 139 is more popular and becoming a bit of a star according to the number on order and therefore probably a better career choice for further jobs.
The 139 is a little noisy inside but nothing a good ANR headset would not fix. Cannot speak for the 92.
The 139 is more popular and becoming a bit of a star according to the number on order and therefore probably a better career choice for further jobs.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ...in view of the 'Southern Cross' ...
Posts: 1,383
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mmmmm ...
..... The 139 is more like 12-15 degrees nose up in hover ....
BOLLOCKS .....
You may well see 12-20 dergrees nose up decelerating (depending on how rough you are handling the beast) but 5-7 degrees nose up in the hover is about right depending on your loading.
NB according to my type conversion notes ... the transmission is tilted 5 deg fwd at normal rig.
..... The 139 is more like 12-15 degrees nose up in hover ....
BOLLOCKS .....
You may well see 12-20 dergrees nose up decelerating (depending on how rough you are handling the beast) but 5-7 degrees nose up in the hover is about right depending on your loading.
NB according to my type conversion notes ... the transmission is tilted 5 deg fwd at normal rig.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: In The Trap, trapped.....
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but I can tell you that the s92 ............. takes forever to start up and shut down.
Ask the SAR guys what they think of the Start up/Shut down times.
ANR or Helmets is way ahead for noise, better still a Helmet with ANR.
Nose up
Spinwing,
there must be something wrong with the four 139's I fly. Even in the long nose variant with the avionics in the nose we are 12 degrees nose up in the hover.
Would be interested to hear from others who fly it because we may have four dodgy machines!
Perhaps you fly with two heavy pilots and no fuel or baggage.
Spinwing, what variant do you fly long or short nose?
there must be something wrong with the four 139's I fly. Even in the long nose variant with the avionics in the nose we are 12 degrees nose up in the hover.
Would be interested to hear from others who fly it because we may have four dodgy machines!
Perhaps you fly with two heavy pilots and no fuel or baggage.
Spinwing, what variant do you fly long or short nose?
