Pilot fined after landing helicopter in village car park
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Wrong Town
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just find it odd that the newspapers are so crap at reporting news and don't do any research.
Likewise it seems you didn't bother looking either or you would have seen it appears to belong to one individual. As for the incident I would imagine that this is not the first time or otherwise how come there was such a swift police involvement. Usually they have trouble finding there own arses so why did they get so quickly involved in this incident?
Perhaps the pilot has previously upset some one would be my first guess but I doubt we will ever know as the journalist reporting does not seem to have spent any time trying to interview anyone at the place where it happened.
Also quite surprised the CAA got a conviction usually when they get top court they lose as they are mostly incompetent pen pushers.
Likewise it seems you didn't bother looking either or you would have seen it appears to belong to one individual. As for the incident I would imagine that this is not the first time or otherwise how come there was such a swift police involvement. Usually they have trouble finding there own arses so why did they get so quickly involved in this incident?
Perhaps the pilot has previously upset some one would be my first guess but I doubt we will ever know as the journalist reporting does not seem to have spent any time trying to interview anyone at the place where it happened.
Also quite surprised the CAA got a conviction usually when they get top court they lose as they are mostly incompetent pen pushers.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The court heard .... if there had been a problem with the engine the helicopter would have just dropped “like a brick” and there would have been no way to land.
Martin James, an investigator with the Civil Aviation Authority, said: “He put his own interests before the people of Treorchy.”
Introducing a local element is an old trick often used by politicians trying to win over an audience, but inappropriate for someone who is supposed to be an objective investigator.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Age: 71
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Heliport for those thoughts which seem very apposite.
The prosecuting lawyer seems to be verging on the untruthful when he said those things: certainly overegging the danger and distinctly partial. Are prosecutors still meant to be officers of the court? Even the CAA are unable to change the laws of physics, to avoid autorotation existing. A helicopter without a working/connected power source ain't a brick. The CAA itself acknowledges that by having different SE low flying rules for heles rather than planks: "land without danger to persons or property" compared with "land clear of the congested area".
They should have just stuck to the offence that he was convicted of which was a serious abdication of his responsibility as a pilot.
None of which makes the pilot's version of events any more likely.
It would be interesting to know whether this pilot had a "history" with the feds.
The prosecuting lawyer seems to be verging on the untruthful when he said those things: certainly overegging the danger and distinctly partial. Are prosecutors still meant to be officers of the court? Even the CAA are unable to change the laws of physics, to avoid autorotation existing. A helicopter without a working/connected power source ain't a brick. The CAA itself acknowledges that by having different SE low flying rules for heles rather than planks: "land without danger to persons or property" compared with "land clear of the congested area".
They should have just stuck to the offence that he was convicted of which was a serious abdication of his responsibility as a pilot.
None of which makes the pilot's version of events any more likely.
It would be interesting to know whether this pilot had a "history" with the feds.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmm take your pick, the freeloaders of the world; greenies, Garnauts, carbon tax despots etc all do, why not some idiot Aviation investigator as such below?
but inappropriate for someone who is supposed to be an objective investigator.
But this bit is exceptionally irresponsible.
helicopter would have just dropped “like a brick”
I mean he should have said, 'well it'll come down like a brick s***house'
The pilot would then have instantly known had any of it hit the fan on the way past that he would be in real - big - trouble.
As a side issue this;-
Reminds me of a chief pilot I once knew whose favourite coffee cup, which he used to nurture lovingly in his gloved hand as he covertly glanced around with his twinkling grey eyes, was inscribed with the words,
"I go down easy"
I never could figure out why for such a good pilot.
but inappropriate for someone who is supposed to be an objective investigator.
helicopter would have just dropped “like a brick”
The pilot would then have instantly known had any of it hit the fan on the way past that he would be in real - big - trouble.
As a side issue this;-
I had to go down on a hill in Germany a few years ago
"I go down easy"
I never could figure out why for such a good pilot.
.
In an R44?
Sorry, but what is the issue here; that the car park is in a built-up area or he didn't have permission to use it or both?
Caught trying to play the loaded executive.
Sorry, but what is the issue here; that the car park is in a built-up area or he didn't have permission to use it or both?
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The fine and costs awards should be a very welcome contribution to the [largely fixed] cost base of the UK justice system.
I assume that's what the CAA claimed it cost them.
Savoia, according to the report, he was fined for "failing without reasonable excuse to comply with a direction".
He said he'd made a 'precautionary' landing because he was concerned about the clutch light. He was subsequently told, either by his engineer or by the CAA (or both), that the aircraft was unsafe and was grounded until it had been inspected by an engineer (the CAA apparently "issued a notice to that effect"). Having been told this/issued with the notice, he took off anyway. And that decision cost him close on six grand.
He said he'd made a 'precautionary' landing because he was concerned about the clutch light. He was subsequently told, either by his engineer or by the CAA (or both), that the aircraft was unsafe and was grounded until it had been inspected by an engineer (the CAA apparently "issued a notice to that effect"). Having been told this/issued with the notice, he took off anyway. And that decision cost him close on six grand.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: swansea, wales
Age: 66
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am sure this is the same individual who annoyed the police when he followed a cessna aircraft (Cambrian Air) also out of swansea that crashed into a field in the Gorseinon area last year, and retrieved and flew an injured person from that aircraft out and away as the emergency services, police ambulance and fore brigade arrived, including the local air ambulance.
.
Robbo thanks. I did read that but also noted that in his remarks the driver was defending his decision to land in the car park as opposed to a playing field, hence the query, and wondering whether he was being prosecuted for that also.
Robbo thanks. I did read that but also noted that in his remarks the driver was defending his decision to land in the car park as opposed to a playing field, hence the query, and wondering whether he was being prosecuted for that also.
He broke the law on two counts:
He was guilty of admitting to fly a Robinson helicopter.
Secondly - he admitted flying it close to other human beings who might have been accidentally contaminated with the Robinson bug. Must have been toptobottom
He was guilty of admitting to fly a Robinson helicopter.
Secondly - he admitted flying it close to other human beings who might have been accidentally contaminated with the Robinson bug. Must have been toptobottom
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A helicopter without a working/connected power source ain't a brick.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He landed his bright red ’copter (sic) on an unused car park at the end of Station Road, in Treorchy, Rhondda, instead of following protocol and landing it on a playing field just metres away,
What protocol says that British pilots making a precautionary landing are required to land on a playing field instead of an unused car park just metres away?
griffothefog
Classic.... sounds like a flying anorak.
I'd say that shows he's public spirited, not an anorak.
bolkow
well if thats the chopper he has upgraded, My God!
I mean a proper helicopter.
I know from your posts that you're an enthusiastic spotter and fly RC helicopters.
Last edited by Bronx; 28th Jun 2011 at 16:45.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: swansea, wales
Age: 66
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well bronyx, as a matter of fact I used to not that I see the significance. Even learned in the good old USA at Columbus Ohio started on a jetranger.
Changed profession since then, and to be frank if the internet was available in the eighties I'd have been on a site such as this then. I once landed a jet ranger in a bob evans car park. Silly? Yes, I did not get any bother, but most of us have evolved safety wise since the mid eighties.
Changed profession since then, and to be frank if the internet was available in the eighties I'd have been on a site such as this then. I once landed a jet ranger in a bob evans car park. Silly? Yes, I did not get any bother, but most of us have evolved safety wise since the mid eighties.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He lost the case because he decided to defend himself, simple. The Courts don't like it because the bloke in the street doesn't speak legal speak or fully understand the law and and the workings of the Court.