schweizer 333 v's MD500e
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: earth
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
schweizer 333 v's MD500e
Merry christmas to all.
There is a descision to be made about getting a few 333's or going for the MD500e. Out here in the middle east they are needed for training.
I am looking at maintenance issues with each type and the servicibility from the manufacturer.
Also in the desert we add about 40% onto the maintenance cost due to the harsh enviroment.
I know the saudi's for their cadet program are using 333's, are there any guys in Jeddah flying these aircraft to give us a heads up.
Cost is not a problem for these type of aircraft, and personally I would always go for the MD500e.
Is there anyone from TAMS in the UK who operate 333's can enlighten me about any teething problems.
Also last point does anybody know which of these you can strap an air con onto.
cheers
fluffy
There is a descision to be made about getting a few 333's or going for the MD500e. Out here in the middle east they are needed for training.
I am looking at maintenance issues with each type and the servicibility from the manufacturer.
Also in the desert we add about 40% onto the maintenance cost due to the harsh enviroment.
I know the saudi's for their cadet program are using 333's, are there any guys in Jeddah flying these aircraft to give us a heads up.
Cost is not a problem for these type of aircraft, and personally I would always go for the MD500e.
Is there anyone from TAMS in the UK who operate 333's can enlighten me about any teething problems.
Also last point does anybody know which of these you can strap an air con onto.
cheers
fluffy
Tams gave up on 333's for all sorts of reasons including they couldnt fly in the rain ( probably not worried about that !)
Never sure it is a good idea putting so much power through what is effectively a 300 !!!
I run 500's and S300's no maintenance issues from the factories concerning spares on either.
Never sure it is a good idea putting so much power through what is effectively a 300 !!!
I run 500's and S300's no maintenance issues from the factories concerning spares on either.
The Saudi aircraft are not currently flying a great deal, its a pilotage/manpower/training technique issue rather than one relating to the airframe. I understand training of the local would be pilots has not gone particularly well.
TAMS has been off the radar for a year now.
I may have missed it but I do not think the 434 is yet civil certified but the Saudi's do not need that. There are a few operators of the 333 but it is not in widespread use. That puts you at the [not so difficult] decision point of tried and tested or unproven.
TAMS has been off the radar for a year now.
I may have missed it but I do not think the 434 is yet civil certified but the Saudi's do not need that. There are a few operators of the 333 but it is not in widespread use. That puts you at the [not so difficult] decision point of tried and tested or unproven.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: earth
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for some heads up, out here we train the military cadets in the UAE.
95% of it all on B206, but we did have 3 R44 raven2's. we got the first award from robinson for the most hostile enviroment, the tail rotors and mainrotors do not last long, also 7 engine failures due to fuel vapourisation in the fuel line because of the heat.
Thanks for the above inputs and also the private messaging.
The powers that be may go the way of the saudi's as they are all deeply in involved with sikorsky.
fluffy
95% of it all on B206, but we did have 3 R44 raven2's. we got the first award from robinson for the most hostile enviroment, the tail rotors and mainrotors do not last long, also 7 engine failures due to fuel vapourisation in the fuel line because of the heat.
Thanks for the above inputs and also the private messaging.
The powers that be may go the way of the saudi's as they are all deeply in involved with sikorsky.
fluffy
