Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

O Romeo, Romeo, wherefore art thou Romeo..?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

O Romeo, Romeo, wherefore art thou Romeo..?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Oct 2010, 05:35
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere, Over the Rainbow
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree, twinhueyman, the CT7-8 (S-92's engine, right?) is IIRC a 2500ish hp machine. Would be nice to see it fitted to a Seahawk, but I wonder if there would not be significant transmission limitations.
That's the hot point in our eyes right now as the aircraft are going through testing. The H-60L transmission is a damn good one now that the problems have been sorted out, and it will continue to be good if the extra power of the CT7 is used for performance in nonstandard conditions. But similar to the contingency power setup, if it's there, a lot of people want it all the time - even if its supposed to be for reserve... Fingers are crossed on my hands for FADEC controlled limits on par with a 701D H-60L across an expanded envelope, and some amazing OEI performance. It would be nice to damn near forget about the TGT gauge during all but the most extreme environments, and be able to power out of just about any situation if one of the donks quits, even on our lead sleds. That would make the Hawk an even better combat helicopter.

Mike
TwinHueyMan is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2010, 13:29
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,231
Received 420 Likes on 262 Posts
Agreed, twin, particularly as the high hot and heavy seems the standard operating environment in, for example, Afghanistan ...
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2010, 01:29
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Homer, Alaska
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Navy: Facebook pics motivated helicopter dip into Tahoe

Navy: Facebook pics motivated helicopter dip into Tahoe | TahoeBonanza.com

SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, Calif. — The crew of two naval helicopters that dipped into Lake Tahoe in September were hovering close to the water at Emerald Bay to get photos for their commands' Facebook page, according to a naval official.

No punitive actions will be taken against the aircrew and squadron, a Navy investigation concluded, but administrative measures are in progress to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Two unidentified Navy pilots were on the return leg of a cross-country tour on Sept. 13 when they attempted to maneuver their MH-60 Romeo helicopters into a “hover” a few feet above the water in Emerald Bay, according to the investigation. The aircraft did not have sufficient power to sustain the hover and slowly descended into the water before summoning enough power to regain altitude and land at nearby Lake Tahoe Airport.

The incident was recorded and posted on YouTube.

“The investigation found that the mishap was entirely preventable had the aircrew followed required directives for conducting cross-country flights and applied more vigilant operational risk management,” according to a Navy release.

The cost of repairs for both aircraft totaled $505,751.20.

“The investigation identified the decision of the aircraft commanders to conduct hovers over Lake Tahoe without completing the necessary engine performance calculations as the causal factor for the mishap,” according to the same release. “The report also identified several contributing factors, including the aircrew's complacency, lack of flight discipline and lack of command oversight in planning and executing cross-country flights.”

The investigation also made several recommendations relating to training and procedures to prevent future incidents of this nature, said Lt. Aaron Kakiel, media officer for the Naval Air Forces command at North Island in San Diego.

The Maritime Strike Helicopter Squadron (HSM) 41 will review the way pilots and aircrew are trained, specifically to identify training events that are compatible with cross-country flights, Kakiel said. The crew will formalize a deliberate operational risk management process, which identifies all potential risks of a mission and what can be done to mitigate those risks, Kakiel said.

Instructors will use a more formal process and documentation when training, Kakiel added. Cross-country flights will also be added to topics for officer training and instructor syllabi.

The command that oversees this squadron and other squadrons like it will also develop a policy regarding photography in flight. The September incident stemmed from “a desire from the people in the aircraft to get photos for their commands' Facebook page,” Kakiel said.

“That's why they were trying to go into the hover where they were,” he said.

Members of the squadron went to a field naval aviator evaluation board, the results of which are not available for release Kakiel said.

However, according to the San Diego Union Tribune, because of the incident two Navy instructor pilots were stripped of flying status and two student pilots will have to repeat training.

According to www.signonsandiego.com “the loss of flight status as a pilot means he or she will have to seek a non-flying job in the Navy. With tight competition among naval officers for job slots, this action could be career-ending.”
GeorgeMandes is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2010, 20:28
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: here, there, everywhere
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Um... What's FacePPRuNe?
Stuck_in_an_ATR is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.