Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

RNZAF Helicopter Crash near Wellington, April 2010 - 3 Killed

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

RNZAF Helicopter Crash near Wellington, April 2010 - 3 Killed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Dec 2011, 05:03
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Beside the seaside
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a time and a place for a 'can do' attitude and pre-positioning for a ANZAC day fly-past is neither. A bit more of the 'no can do' attitude that day might have saved them.
Epiphany is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 05:58
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Florida/Sandbox/UK
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I beg to differ.

"Can do", and "No can do", are frames of mind that determine how every job is approached. The flypast was obviously a big deal, and they wanted it to happen. The "Can do" approach got them in the air in the middle of the night to try to make that important day a little more special.

I have no doubt that the weather risks were assessed and perceived as acceptable by the formation leader, all crews in the formation and the authorising officer.

Yes, your 20/20 hindsight provides you with wisdom that was not available that morning. I don't think that is a reason to change the attitude of an Air Force to one that says "No can do".

Tam
hihover is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 08:46
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Beside the seaside
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I beg to differ.
As you are perfectly entitled to do so.

The problem that I see with the 'can do' attitude is that once committed it doesn't leave much option for retreat. This formation does not appear to have given much thought to that or how to recover safely from IIMC.

I also somehow doubt that the families of the crew were very happy to read the following which could also be described as a 'can do' attitude.

The Defence Force's court of inquiry, released today, into the accident found sub-standard protocols and a culture of "rule breaking" among 3 Squadron was partly to blame.
Epiphany is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 10:59
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 514 Likes on 215 Posts
In the US Army....IIMC recovery was part of our formation flight SOP's as far back as 1968....and I am sure every military aviation organization that flies formation has an SOP, that while not necessarily briefed prior to each formation flight, remains in the individual Aviator's Kitbag of Knowledge.

It does make one question why the positioning flight was not made the day before in the daylight...or in better weather...if the fly by was that important.
SASless is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2011, 10:47
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New Zealand
Age: 52
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sas and epiphany, I tend to agree, for a couple of reasons. I also agree that the can do attitude is what makes us New Zealanders, and as long as it doesn't kill us, we either get the job done or learn a great lesson.

It's one of the reasons Sir Ed Hillary conquered Everest!

Unfortunately when it does kill us then we can only hope that others learn from our mistakes. As my instructor said, learn from others mistakes, you won't live long enough to make them all yourself...

Having said that, April 25 doesn't sneak up on us any year, we know that we have dawn parades, we know that the military do fly pasts. I can also tell you that when we, being helicopter pilots, in New Zealand heard that a machine was missing in the fog, we all remembered the weather forecasts from the night before, or infact the few days before, and said of course someone has gone missing, the weather had been marginal for at least a couple of days and the forecast was crap. The military have a base in Wellington, why not go there, I guess that's the question that will always be asked. I hope that they use those options in the future.
SuperF is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 10:09
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An update from the New Zealand Herald;

Officer charged over Anzac Day chopper crash - National - NZ Herald News
P6 Driver is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 16:41
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Shelton WA.
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Doesn't seem right!
Gemini Twin is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 03:42
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperF
...I also agree that the can do attitude is what makes us New Zealanders, and as long as it doesn't kill us, we either get the job done or learn a great lesson...
I see it in PNG all the time, Kiwi pilots doing stuff that others wouldn't. Which I guess is part of the reason why Kiwi pilots are so much in favor with the PNG employers (i.e. not many Aussies left in PNG any more).
gulliBell is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 06:42
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,848
Received 56 Likes on 37 Posts
SuperF,

Best one yet!

Sad but true.

Last edited by RVDT; 5th Mar 2013 at 06:43.
RVDT is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 09:00
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kiwi pilots doing stuff that others wouldn't.
gulliBell, lets nor get too precious. I recall you happily flogging around at 300 feet in solid IMC. As was I.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 11:04
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
True, but I only flog around at 300' in scud when I'm in an IFR helicopter and I have the option of climbing up into it
gulliBell is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.