Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Which 355 is the right 355

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Which 355 is the right 355

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Mar 2010, 11:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Here,there &everywhere
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which 355 is the right 355

I'm in the market for a utility 355. VFR with rescue hoist, cargo swing, wire strike and able to pick up 2200lbs externaly. I have no 355 experience, but have a few hours in the 350 range. Which 355 would be the best for the utility role and why? (F1/2, FX, N, NP)

Thanks for any info.

Cheers
DC
Dynamic Component is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2010, 11:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F1/2: forget it.
FX: I don't know.
N or NP: NP is the new generation of the N, then NP could be the good choice.
choppersky is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2010, 12:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Asia/Oz
Posts: 219
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Empty weight of a VFR 355N WITHOUT hook and hoist is around 1600kg. Max AUW is 2600kg, so it will not be possible to lift 2200lb (1000kg) externally with this variant.
Mark Six is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2010, 13:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the hills of halton
Age: 71
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.helilynx.com/images/pdf/3...%2015Feb08.pdf

Where do you want to operate ?.

355FX2 is Easa Approved , the C20R version I think is still pending.

Looking at the chart , I think the last column must be the AS350.
widgeon is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2010, 13:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,848
Received 56 Likes on 37 Posts
And with an "N" you will need a spare engine!
RVDT is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2010, 11:13
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Here,there &everywhere
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have heard that I might need a spare engine with a N.
Will be operating hot and high(mostly hot ,30+ degC)
Does anyone have any experience in the FX range?(355 that is)
Thanks for the feedback.

Cheers
DC
Dynamic Component is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2010, 11:52
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Perth/Inverness
Age: 67
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unless you really need a twin - I'd go for a 350 B3. None of the 355 series will lift 1T with hoist fitted (you're also carrying the extra weight of a second engine).
Bondu121 is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 01:23
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Here,there &everywhere
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Bondu121,
We have a B3. I wouldn't be asking the question if it didn't have to be a twin.
The hoist does not have to be fitted during lifting.

Cheers
DC
Dynamic Component is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 04:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,154
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Does it have to be a 355, and does it have to be Eurocopter?

They are not renowned for their lifting capabilities, though I rather like flying them myself. Their only real benefit as twins is that they are small enough not to annoy the neighbours, and yes, if you get anything Eurocopter make sure you can either sit on the ground for months while you wait for a new engine (and gearbox) or have a spare.

As I understand it, the FX is simply any model of 350/355 with a new wiring loom (sorely needed!) and some new instrumentation. Typically shaves about 100 lbs off the AUW. It's not a separate type as such.

phil
paco is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 06:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: no comment ;)
Age: 59
Posts: 822
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
First feasible option:

BK117 B2
  • Empty weight: 1,727 kg (3,807 lb)
  • Max takeoff weight: 3,350 kg (7,385 lb)
9Aplus is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 06:59
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
I'd be surprised to find a 117B2 at that light a weight: nearer to 1950kg would be the norm.

But the Max AUW for hook operations is 3500kg, so 1000kg on the hook with crew and an hour fuel plus reserves is quite feasible
John Eacott is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 21:55
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Here,there &everywhere
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have considered the BK, but we have no operational experience in it.
Any feedback would be appreciated.

Cheers
DC
Dynamic Component is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.