Eurocopter X3 hybrid
Be very interested to see the low speed/x-wind/sideways/rearwards handling,and whether `changes` get made...
Any coincidence it's called the X3, putting it (in terms of name alone) ahead of Sikorsky's X2? I doubt it. Yeah, pretty fugly... and I don't know if I'd want to board the aircraft with the props turning.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Linköping, Sweden
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is concept only? Probably any commercial aircraft will have shrouded side rotors or clutch to disengage side engines as these are to dangerous for rotors turning loading/unloading.
Is yaw control by using side engines for left/right movement as you do in a vehicle with tracks?
YBB
Is yaw control by using side engines for left/right movement as you do in a vehicle with tracks?
YBB
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the hills of halton
Age: 71
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting, how will they lower RPM of the main rotor while increasing power to the tip props?
Last edited by widgeon; 27th Sep 2010 at 21:20. Reason: sense
Wow, she's a beaut. Nice video too. Not too many points for originality on the name, though.
I've said it before, anybody who makes something new and actually flies it deserves credit. Will be interesting to see how it performs.
Looks like slope landings may not be its specialty, unless you are nose up/nose down the hill.
Is it FBW or mechanical? From the video it sounds like it is not FBW. Would seem to be crying out for a FBW solution, then again maybe blending collective position vs thrust vs speed vs antitorque is not that hard.
-- IFMU
I've said it before, anybody who makes something new and actually flies it deserves credit. Will be interesting to see how it performs.
Looks like slope landings may not be its specialty, unless you are nose up/nose down the hill.
Is it FBW or mechanical? From the video it sounds like it is not FBW. Would seem to be crying out for a FBW solution, then again maybe blending collective position vs thrust vs speed vs antitorque is not that hard.
-- IFMU
I'm sure it would need shrouded props to be viable, and they would have the advatage of reduced diameter too. It will be interesting to hear how fast they get. I know that head/rotor has been to 210 kts on the EC-155 prototype and 240 kts on another demonstrator, so lots of potential!
The name is not X-three, it's X-cubed.
The name is not X-three, it's X-cubed.
Originally Posted by 212man
The name is not X-three, it's X-cubed.
-- IFMU
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East of the sun, west of the moon, straight on till morning
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well damn!!!
Back in the secondary/uni days I came up a with a concept for a helicopter/compound aircraft. I couldn't interest any of the engineering profs at my uni so I filed it away.
It was based on a Rutan concept for a two place aircraft in Popular Mechanics. My design was a two to three place aircraft with staggered seating, the third possibly facing backwards, with a forward swept, negative staggered wing, bicycle landing gear with outriggers (a la B-52) and either wing mounted pusher props or ducted fans. I gave up on the idea of a pure heli and settled on a jump take off gyro with a powered rotor to overcome the induced drag of a pure gyro ( see Igor Benson's Powergyro concept) with an unloaded rotor flying on the wiing (Like the Cheyenne.) I figured 180 kts+. Not unreasonable given the technology of the 60-70's.
High speed, long loiter times at altitude would make for a great UAV. Too bad I'm a bit of an anti-statist Well more power to them! Will be cool to see what they come up with...
Back in the secondary/uni days I came up a with a concept for a helicopter/compound aircraft. I couldn't interest any of the engineering profs at my uni so I filed it away.
It was based on a Rutan concept for a two place aircraft in Popular Mechanics. My design was a two to three place aircraft with staggered seating, the third possibly facing backwards, with a forward swept, negative staggered wing, bicycle landing gear with outriggers (a la B-52) and either wing mounted pusher props or ducted fans. I gave up on the idea of a pure heli and settled on a jump take off gyro with a powered rotor to overcome the induced drag of a pure gyro ( see Igor Benson's Powergyro concept) with an unloaded rotor flying on the wiing (Like the Cheyenne.) I figured 180 kts+. Not unreasonable given the technology of the 60-70's.
High speed, long loiter times at altitude would make for a great UAV. Too bad I'm a bit of an anti-statist Well more power to them! Will be cool to see what they come up with...
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 425 Likes
on
224 Posts
Looks great. I always thought the Rotodyne concept was way ahead of its time; here it comes again
However, rotors running crew and pax changes will need some careful thought...
The benefits of a high speed SAR machine was mentioned. Where does the winch fit?
However, rotors running crew and pax changes will need some careful thought...
The benefits of a high speed SAR machine was mentioned. Where does the winch fit?
OK, under those nice fairings are, based on my count of intakes, three engines. Does the transmission allow all three to drive the head, and clutching allow for power transmission to the side mounted assemblies?
Neat looking machine.
Maybe a slight forward sweep on the wings would be a good idea ... though CG issues may arise ...
Neat looking machine.
Maybe a slight forward sweep on the wings would be a good idea ... though CG issues may arise ...
OK, under those nice fairings are, based on my count of intakes, three engines. Does the transmission allow all three to drive the head, and clutching allow for power transmission to the side mounted assemblies?
See the vid i posted above!
skadi
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Misler
Any coincidence it's called the X3
Originally Posted by Yellow & Blue Baron
This is concept only?
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
under those nice fairings are, based on my count of intakes, three engines
I/C
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Goodwood, Sussex, UK
Age: 70
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, under those nice fairings are, based on my count of intakes, three engines.
Seems like resonance between the wings/nacelles and the wide tailfins.
Cattletruck did elude to it in his comment:
I would think the lower moment of the pusher/puller props from the MR head would contribute significant pitching movements (like a boat) as the couples fight each other for equilibrium.
Dowty's Ducted Fan Islander
Not only do the props need to become ducted fans or similar but I am sure the entire wing assembly will be modified to accommodate optimal dynamic relation with the main and side rotors.
If they didn't go for fans then the side rotors should ideally become rearward facing (if the cg can be maintained) to encourage better safety.
Just taking a wild stab at the vibration from the side props .. my guess is that the pylons are too flexible and probably have little by way of damping measures.
It will be interesting to see how x-cubed ends up!
Earl
skadi:
I don't typically click on vids. Might take a peak at this one later, though.
Thanks to you and Ian and Earl for insight on third inlet: cooling that transmission sounds a good idea.
I don't typically click on vids. Might take a peak at this one later, though.
Thanks to you and Ian and Earl for insight on third inlet: cooling that transmission sounds a good idea.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Land of damp and drizzle
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New Euro multicopter aims bitchslap at American X2, V-22 ? The Register
Franco-Germano-Spanish helicopter agglomorocorp Eurocopter has announced its aspirations to leave a glowing handprint upon the bitchcheek of US whirlycraft titan Sikorsky. In an apparent response to the Sikorsky X2 triplex speedchopper project, Eurocopter has now pulled the wraps off its own supercopter design - which it has chosen to dub the "X3".
"Hah, it is not merely ze Americains who can make ze flying eggbeaters"
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: foot of a mountain
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am surprised at the comments regarding the shrouded rotor. I am sure EC will get there especially seeing that they are the masters of the fenestron? EC is one manufacturer to whom shrouded rotors are not a new concept so I bet as was said before that the eventual product will look different with different concepts but it remains impressive the short time from development to actually flying again as per the 175. You will never know what works best until you actually start flying it I guess.