Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

T129/AW729 Down in Italy

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

T129/AW729 Down in Italy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Mar 2010, 19:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sunnyvale Rest Home for the Elderly
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T129/AW729 Down in Italy

ASN Aircraft accident 19-MAR-2010 AgustaWestland/TAI T129 ATAK (AW729) CSX81723
Heard through the grapevine that a 129 had come down, Googled the link above, any Italian Pruners with more info?
leopold bloom is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2010, 23:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,079
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
W O W...


video:
VCO Sat - ELICOTTERO PRECIPITA A PREGLIA DI CREVOLADOSSOLA

Narrative:
The T-129 ATAK prototype lost its tail rotor at 15000 ft. height. Two people on board escape fatal injuries thanks ability of test pilot cassioli.
good job


Regards
Aser
Aser is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2010, 09:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
+1. How the hell could anyone survive that? Lost tail rotor at 15,000'??? but it wasn't a 139?
helimutt is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2010, 09:31
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UKdom
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
15000ft? Autorotation 3, 2, 1 Go... and let it sort itself out?
misterbonkers is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2010, 10:04
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lucky, looking at the state of the head, did they leave both engines going during this emergency? Hope the 2 crew have a speedy recovery.
NRDK is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2010, 10:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,267
Received 336 Likes on 188 Posts
but it wasn't a 139?
No, it was a 129. Was being the operative word
212man is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2010, 13:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wasn't being disrespectful to the pilot, who obviously did a sterling job considering what he was faced with, but when i saw AW, I immediately thought of the pic from the gulf of the 139 with the tail hanging off, even though I knew it was a 129.

They're probably not even remotely similar in build characteristics.
helimutt is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2010, 09:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: reckoning
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow... the hats off to this pilot.
Agusta is really gonna come under scrutiny with the tail rotors! I was wondering if such military aircraft accident reports get published in something like NTSB ??
captchopper is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2010, 13:30
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the build location common?

I am in total awe that people survived this and the pilot deserves a medal.

In response to helimutt:
They're probably not even remotely similar in build characteristics.
the significant question is: are the rotors made in the same facility as the booms from the AW139?
blakmax is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2010, 13:52
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the big blue planet
Posts: 1,027
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
15000ft? Autorotation 3, 2, 1 Go... and let it sort itself out?
They didnt have so much time, the failure took place at an altitude of 1500 ft:
Nevertheless a very good job!

PICTURE: Turkey's first T129 attack helicopter crashes

PICTURE: Turkey's first T129 attack helicopter crashes
By Tolga Ozbek


The first prototype of AgustaWestland's T129 attack helicopter being developed for Turkey crashed on the afternoon of 19 March during a test flight, leaving its Italian test pilot and its test engineer needing hospital treatment for minor injuries.
Early indications point to a loss of power to the tail rotor while flying at an elevation of 1,500ft (455m) near Verbania in northern Italy. Investigation of the incident will focus on establishing the exact cause of the power failure.

The $3 billion ATAK project, based on the A129 Mangusta, is likely to be delayed because of the crash. The deal was signed in 2008, and the first prototype, P1, made its first flight in September 2009. Turkey has ordered 50 production T129s for delivery from 2013 and has options on another 41.
AgustaWestland will make two T129 prototypes in Italy, after which manufacture will shift to its Turkish partner TAI. The aircraft will be equipped with Turkish-made systems including electronics, forward-looking infrared sensor, cockpit avionics and mission computer from Aselsan, and weapon systems from Roketsan.

© ATAK

The first T129 flight took place in September 2009
skadi
skadi is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2010, 21:09
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the hills of halton
Age: 71
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep I thought auto from 15,000 should have been a non event from 1500 I can see that things would happen much faster.
widgeon is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 11:02
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Anywhere I can fly
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the significant question is: are the rotors made in the same facility as the booms from the AW139?
What are you trying to say ???

makrider is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 11:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: yeovil
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
15,000 ft

a non-event, except for oxygen kit?

Looks like the A129 crash structures worked and blackmax, the later article talks about loss of tail rotor power. The TGB is clearly visible (and intact) in the video, though I can't make whether the hub's attached, it sits below the camera shot.
nimby is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 13:28
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what makes you think Flight Intl is correct?

this is a RUMOUR site

bear that in mind

A speedy recovery to both crew is what we should be thinking

DM
dangermouse is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 21:36
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: somewhere, under the rainbow
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am in total awe that people survived this and the pilot deserves a medal.


and don't forget the engineers who designed the u/c, structure and seat to absorb all that energy and keep the cockpit intact, eh?
ase engineer is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2010, 05:54
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Land of the Angles
Posts: 359
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Was not the original A129 Mangusta rotor system taken from the A109?

Accepting that a blade may be missing, there are only 4 blade roots visible in the picture in post #11, but it was my understanding that the T-129 (based on the A129 International) would have a 5-bladed rotor.

Is it missing a blade, or are the initial T-129 test platforms fitted with the original 4-bladed A129/A109 rotor system?
Hilife is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2010, 20:43
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clarification from blakmax

Guys

Sorry I have been busier than a centipede on a hot barbeque plate and haven't had the opportunity to respond to makrider
What are you trying to say ???
and nimby:
blackmax, the later article talks about loss of tail rotor power.
My comment:
the same facility as the booms from the AW139?
was in response to helimutt's comment
They're probably not even remotely similar in build characteristics.
To explain, I am convinced that the AW139 tail boom disbonding and possibly the failure at Doha are directly related to micro-voids occurring in the adhesive bond. I base this on photographs sent to me from three different sources which show the disbond surfaces for two cases. These photographs clearly show a very high micro-void content. In studies I have been involved with, micro-voiding can reduce the shear strength of joints by more than 50% and the flat-wise tensile strength of sandwich panels by nearly 30%.
Micro-voids are caused by exposure of adhesive films to high humidity during storage or processing. Hence, the location of the facility (humid environment or not) where structures are bonded can be as significant as the build characteristics to which helimutt referred.

To clarify: I am not suggesting, inferring or in any way construing that adhesive bond failure was a cause for this event. My comments were purely a response to helimutt's posting.

Regards

blakmax
blakmax is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2010, 15:08
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Anywhere I can fly
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the significant question is: are the rotors made in the same facility as the booms from the AW139?
then our question makes no sense...
Think before post useless questions and statements ...
makrider is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2010, 15:20
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is off subject and for that i apologise.

However, being a pilot of only 100 hours or so i am intrigued as to what the course of events would be if someone DID have to auto from 15000ft?

Thanks
Neal
Nealzinmallorca is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2010, 15:31
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The same as 1500 ft but 10x longer wait ...assuming 1500ft/sec ROD........
nigelh is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.