Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helicopter in the ME...

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helicopter in the ME...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jan 2010, 07:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: where the money is
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helicopter in the ME...

Dear helicopter guys (and girls),

somebody asked me about my opinion about which helicopter to buy for a very warm and moist climate (elevation: SL) with flights to and from higher elevations nearby where it is rather dry. Hot and high performance is to be considered.

Since I am and airplane driver and don't pretend to know anything about these scary things with rotors on top, I am asking you for any expertise on that.

I guess, from what I read, a helicopter driven by 2 turbines is a must and the cabin size of an Augusta 109 or Sikorsky 76 seems to be appropriate. And it would be an advantage to have actual operational experience on the Arabian Peninsula.

Don't ask me how serious the guy is - but he is loaded with money, that's for sure and that's a good start as well.

Thank you a lot for your input!

Best regards


jetopa
jetopa is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 08:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: All The Places I Shouldnt Be
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If he is in the Middle East then I would also certainly take into consideration the customer support of the contenders.
Ned-Air2Air is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 08:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: swansea, wales
Age: 66
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two engines does not always and neccessarily equate to greater lift. Not suggesting he buys it, but does'nt the Lama (single turbine) lift the equivalent of its own full weight?
bolkow is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 08:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South of the Equator
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bolkow
Two engines does not always and neccessarily equate to greater lift
Agreed. Out here in Malaysia (where its pretty warm and humid) drivers I have spoken to say EC-135's with 3 pax seem to struggle on take off whereas a B206 Jet Ranger seems to manage with no problems carrying the same load.
Garfs is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 09:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ...in view of the 'Southern Cross' ...
Posts: 1,383
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mmmm ...

Need a bit more info re where exactly he wishes to operate etc ... before informed advice may be given ...

Cheers
spinwing is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 09:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Penzance
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jetopa
driven by 2 turbines is a must and the cabin size of an Augusta 109 or Sikorsky 76 seems to be appropriate
The cabin sizes of these two are significantly different: as an indication, the Agusta A109S Grand can take two rows of 3 pax facing each other with legs intertwined, whilst the S76 can take up to three rows of 4 pax each, or a VIP fit of two armchairs plus a 3/4 place bench plus bar!

The mark of type will also be important. The A109S is vastly superior in performance to the A109C, and the S76C (or variants) will be a different kettle of crustaceans to the 76A.
XV666 is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 10:50
  #7 (permalink)  
hueyracer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I had and i will always prefer a Huey......

Wether you choose a Bell 205 or a Bell 212 (or even a 412)-you will be satisfied......

Before starting a discussion-that´s my opinion-and i prefer the "old" helicopters more than these new, modern "flying computers".....
 
Old 7th Jan 2010, 11:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed!!! Old helicopter are much better than the new flying computer!!! (personal opinion) analogic instruments are better than Glass Cockpits!!!
We are still in time to try old helicopters. After 10 years maybe it will not be possible anymore
ka26 is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 12:13
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: swansea, wales
Age: 66
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
regarding the newer computer helicopters, I will never forget reading about the Irish Air Corps and their acquisition some 20 + years ago of five dauphines for air sea rescue, because they were a one off they were expensive if anything went amiss, but on one occasion they were were having difficuties with response times with one of the machines because it was taking the on board computer 30 minutes to come on line after start up!!!!!!
Thats what concerns more more than anything else about the toys with the latest computer gadgets.
bolkow is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 12:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aberdoom
Posts: 281
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
analogic instruments are better than Glass Cockpits
I scanned the dials for the first 10 years of my flying career! Now i am on glass i will never go back!
chcoffshore is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 14:03
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On the green bit near the blue wobbly stuff
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If he's loaded with money, there is a VIP AW139 for sale in Belgium for about half the cost of a brand new one. That would do the job!
Non-PC Plod is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 14:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is everyone so wary of modern machines ?....... On the way home tonight you will check the news and weather on your Blackberry, then in the car you will no doubt key in the sat nav put the Ipod into the fully intigrated sound system, get home and put on the Plasma TV and never once think any of them will not boot up ! It's all the same technology just more expensive for aviation.....
Glass is the future !

E.
Efirmovich is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 14:39
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ka26
Old helicopter are much better than the new flying computer!!! (personal opinion) analogic instruments are better than Glass Cockpits!!!
Come on, be honest now: is that you, Frank Robinson?

I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 15:46
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: foot of a mountain
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, but if what you listed are the major concerns and you want to fly 5 pax or less there is 1 helicopter that thrives in those circumstances with lots of power to spare and in my experience extremely reliable in hot and high and humid conditions-AS350B3+. Hot and high she out performs most light twins on payload(real hot and high). She has only 1 engine but comes from a family that has accumulated over 20 mil hours that has to be taken in to account when we talk reliability and most of those hours in the worse places you can think off. If your friend wants a twin, look carefully at the OGE graphs and remember no use you look at both engines operitive otherwise you are flying a single for all practical purposes. One also, as mentioned before, can not just talk of 109 or 135. Their performance vary big time between the variants. As mentioned with the 109, you can not compare a 135 with a 135N2/P2.
victor papa is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 15:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: swansea, wales
Age: 66
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I was downed in the sea this eveing with the temperatures, and there was one of each type of chopper scrambling to get me, I'd choose the older model. No telling what can happen to computers in this cold, and with all the sitting in inclement settings, cold hangars etc etc. Naw, I'd go for proven older technology.
bolkow is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 17:41
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And if you did make it to the hospital would you chose the stethescope and chloroform over the modern life support unit ?

E.
Efirmovich is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 20:30
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with Victory Papa.
I fly a S-76 A++ in the SAR role and on a Hot day and 100 ft AMSL the thing struggles big time!
The AS 350 B3 would out perform it every way except cabin room.
Think carefully about what you are using it for, and if a twin is really necessary, if it is then make sure you get one with big engines!
starflex3 is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 20:35
  #18 (permalink)  
hueyracer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
And if you did make it to the hospital would you chose the stethescope and chloroform over the modern life support unit ?
Not adressed to me-but i would prefer the best....but that doesn´t mean automatically the modern stuff.....

Acupuncture, massage, traditional (eastern) medicine.....old things are often more reliable than all this new "itchy gear"...
 
Old 8th Jan 2010, 06:53
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: where the money is
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info!

Everyone: thank you for your valuable input so far! And I will mention this AW139 in Belgium, of course. Chopper would be based in JED, KSA with flights to destinations nearby, sometimes at higher elevations @ temp. of > 45-50 deg. C in the summer. That's as much as I know right now. No Government directly involved, to my knowledge.

If there are more questions, I will come back in this forum.

I will forward the messages to the potential buyer, but - as I have seen it many times in Aviation - the eyes are sometimes bigger than the wallets are deep...
jetopa is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 11:45
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Philadelphia PA
Age: 73
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'd also look seriously at the Bell 429 - huge cabin, great performance (hover and cruise) and very smooth. PM me if you'd like my pilot review article from Vertical.
Shawn Coyle is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.