Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Aerokopter1-3 for Australian CPL work

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Aerokopter1-3 for Australian CPL work

Old 27th Oct 2009, 22:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aerokopter1-3 for Australian CPL work

I am checking out a career change and hoping the heli community can help out with some advice. Can the Ukrainian subuaru engine AK1-3 be registered in Australia for CPL work, ie pax carrying tourism work, and some stock spotting / mustering? Are there any in Australia yet? It is now in the USA - does that mean it could get OK by CASA?
Koezy is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2009, 00:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 88
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's being sold in the US as an experimental kit, that's not going to help you out with CASA.
brett s is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2009, 06:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both uncertified airframe and engine, so nothing of a commercial nature permitted. But nothing to stop you stock spotting/mustering if you were flying it yourself on your property as far as I know.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2009, 21:36
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AK1-3 to Australia for CPL work

Dear Brian,

Thanks for reply. Am I seeing a commercial opportunity here ie importing AK to Australia as an alternative to R22? This is somewhat attractive under the current circumstances of a very strong and getting stronger aussie dollar.

There are problems with using the robbie for mustering and from reading posts on another aussie forum I gather the heli pilots in the mustering game see potential in the AK.

I understand the process would be long, and tedious, trying to get registration as it is dealing with government department bods. And no doubt expensive as it involves CASA. Not to mention the difficulties of I no speakie da Ukrainian'/ Russian.

From your experience in Aust aviation does the AK look like a good enough prospect to have a go at a registration process? I would try and team up with someone with an existing Air Operators Cert. Got any pointers as to who I should talk to in CASA?

Thank you. Koezy.
Koezy is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2009, 23:55
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Koezy, it would be a non starter. The greatest killing point is the engine is not certified (besides the fact the aircraft is not certified, and can't be certified with an uncertified engine). Would take an IMMENSE amount of money and time to do so and it just won't happen. An approach to CASA would only get one answer - NO WAY. Suggest you save your money and time (and heartache) and pursue some other project in life.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2009, 09:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of curiosity... Can anyone tell me what sort or things would be tested or needed for an vehicle engine to be certified?

I know everything costs money...

But proven reliability must count for something, just wanna know what they want it to do...

Is seems stupid as most flat four car engines are far more advanced than their aircraft brothers, and the EJ20- EJ25 Subaru engine is a very reliable engine in the motoring world

Is the 13B rotary safe through CASA? Ive seen them in a few planes before but not sure of the aircrafts restrictions

I know certification is important to anything aircraft

Lycommings scare the crap out of me... Nothing says confidence like a robbie that takes more than five tryes to fire up and sounds like a lawnmower


Thanks Simon
ChopperFAN is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2009, 10:13
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: I am not sure where we are, but at least it is getting dark
Posts: 356
Received 19 Likes on 9 Posts
reliability in a car does not equal reliability in an aircraft. The way the engine is run in a helicopter is fundamentally different from a car (torque, operating speed, usage of full throttle for extended times)

In addition to that, there are other issues to be dealt with, such as sudden air pressure and temperature changes.


I agree that your average Lycomings are an ancient design, that should've probably been replaced (by something watercooled with overhead camshafts) about 30 years ago, but you can't really say they aren't reliable.


If you want to know how hard and expensive it is to certify a new aircraft engine, just ask the folks at Thielert in Germany.
lelebebbel is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2009, 10:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Earth
Age: 54
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Koezy,

The R22 has been mustering in Australia for god knows how long and has done an Incredible job, considering this machine was built for personal transport and Frank R did not intend it for the harsh commercial reality of Mustering in Australia's outback.

Could you PM me which forums are saying this Aerokotper may make a better mustering machine than the R22, or post it on here.
Heliringer is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2009, 12:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't blag the old aero engines too readily. Efficiency is the key, and that is measured by how much fuel you have to burn per hour to produce each horsepower. All the gizmos on our car engines today are mostly for pollution control, and they would be hard pressed to better a Continental or Lycoming in the fuel efficiency stakes.

The Airworthiness Standards for aircraft engines are here

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations:

Of particular note are the testing requirements, FAR33.41 to 33.57. You are talking millions of dollars, and then some.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2009, 21:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In the air with luck
Posts: 1,018
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The AK appears to be a sound design but as sad the cost of certification is going to be prohibitive.Have talked to some one who has flown one and was told it was real good.
lelebebbel
You want to try the German Autobahn 120 mph with 4\5 cars flashing to overtake!!
And they keep the pedal pressed for hours
500e is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.