Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Sikorsky Begins Whirl Testing Active Rotor System

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Sikorsky Begins Whirl Testing Active Rotor System

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Aug 2009, 00:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sikorsky Begins Whirl Testing Active Rotor System

From Aviation International News

Sikorsky Aircraft yesterday said it has begun whirl testing a demonstration rotor system with active flaps as part of the company’s “commitment to design, develop, test and ultimately field next-generation technologies that will advance the current state of rotorcraft.” Development partners on the project are United Technologies Research Center for the blades and Hamilton Sundstrand Claverham for the flap actuators. According to Sikorsky advanced programs manager Jim Kagdis, “We have reached full speed of 450 rpm and commenced testing flap integrity and functionality. Now we will investigate rotor reconfiguration capabilities to demonstrate the potential to reduce rotor vibration and noise, and increase blade loading, which enables higher maneuverability and speed.” Testing will continue throughout this month and wind-tunnel testing is scheduled for next year. “We are on a path to prove the concept of configuring a helicopter’s dynamic system to maximize aircraft performance, reduce noise and lower vibration while enhancing overall mission effectiveness,” said Sikorsky vice president of research and engineering Mark Miller. “It is another step toward meeting future needs and customer expectations.”
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2009, 07:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Whirl Testing!!!"

What are they going to do? Tie a rope to it and swing it around their heads?

What's with the baby-talk? Ga-ga Ooooh!
Agaricus bisporus is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2009, 08:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,837
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
What's up AB? get out of the wrong side of the bed this morning?
"whirl testing" - Google Search
MightyGem is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2009, 11:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting that this technology is having significant R&D budget poured in now. That means that there must be an intended introduction date for production Sikorsky machines.

The benefits to the helicopter industry will be significant. If nothing else then it means that vibration will be removed at source (by correctly terminating/damping the free end of the blades). If the system can be signed off as sufficiently reliable to perform all of the fatigue assesment against then TBOs may well go up. At the extreme payloads for a given rotor/machine size may well go up too.

So ultimately a little investment for a big return...
Graviman is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2009, 12:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Eurocopter are well ahead,already flying active flap technology on an EC135.
heli1 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2009, 14:18
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the big blue planet
Posts: 1,027
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
@heli1

Eurocopter tested this system on a BK117 ( S/N 7045 Reg. D-HMBD ) in the first days of September 2005:

Helionline.de


skadi
skadi is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2009, 15:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: yeovil
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Should the presser have read "Sikorsky plays catch-up"?
nimby is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2009, 17:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by heli1
Eurocopter are well ahead,already flying active flap technology on an EC135.
Heli1, are there any links / publications on that work? Not that that i doubt your word, i am genuinely interested. I know that ONERA were doing a lot of work on this system recently (using an EC135 rotor system i imagine). The difficulty with the trailing edge only servos, as i recall, is that for the desired lift modification you also get an undesired pitch modification. I had wondered about leading and trailing edge devices to counter this, and maybe also allow twist resonance damping (blades resonate in flap and twist - ideally at well seperated frequencies to avoid flutter).

Mart
Graviman is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2009, 18:30
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nimbi wrote;
Should the presser have read "Sikorsky plays catch-up"?
Sikorsky's Patent Application 20080145220 ~ On-blade actuator for helicopter rotor blade control flaps was filed on December 14, 2006.

This is 15 months after Eurocopter's testing.
_________________________

Sikorsky's Patent Application 20070125907 ~ Variable speed gearbox with an independently variable speed tail rotor system for a rotary wing aircraft was filed on December 02, 2005.

This is 5 months after the thread Variable Speed Rotors and Prop(s) on PPRuNe.

Sikorsky's patent lawyer listed Nick L. as the primary inventor. A subject that was politely discussed here.
________________________

Perhaps Sikorsky needs more conceptualization engineers and fewer lawyers.
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2009, 01:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: In the soup
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Active flaps, etc.

Nimby- check previous stuff online. Big S has been partnered with NASA for over a decade, running a hydraulic PCL setup, full scale in the NASA wind tunnel. The latest trend tends towards the active flap/trim tab portion.

But seriously, being on the pilot and maintenance side, run a search on video of a blade in-flight. They've taken a camera mounted to the root of a UH-60 system in flight, and it might as well be a spaghetti noodle. So, for those that expect a dramatic change, I'd reevaluate expectations. Not that we wouldn't all like to get rid of M/R dynamic vibe, but it's a bit at a time, I'm afraid. And as much science as it is now, some is still an art. Just not the chalk and flag art that it was of years ago.

Too true on engineers and fewer lawyers, Dave. Maybe why we're seeing products like the S-92 show up.
BV234driver is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2009, 13:24
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: yeovil
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You only know what you know

... I was suggesting (a) prior art elsewhere and (b) other technologies
nimby is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2009, 17:38
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CH
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Here is a short Swiss tv documentary about the Eurocopter system, tested on a MBB BK117B2 at the Eurocopter Heliport at Donauwoerth in Germany. The video is only in german, but it shows some nice details of the system.
MrDrumpy is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2009, 18:53
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Early Whirl Tower


Picture from Chapter #3 'Room for Only One Inventor', in the book 'KAMAN ~ Our Early Years'.

Where would rotorcraft be today if United Technologies had kept Charles and let Igor go?

Dave
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2009, 12:17
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 950
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
If UTC had Let Igor Go vis-a-vis Charles ( Kaman )

Dave, since this is entitled as a Pilots Forum, perhaps this one parameter may answer the question:

At present ( I checked this yesterday with a SA pilot who we hired out of Kaman ),
  • Kaman has one test pilot.
  • Sikorsky has 52, working at up to five locations and on 9-11 development projects in addition to the production and customer support activities.
Thanks,
John Dixson
JohnDixson is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2009, 14:51
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the hills of halton
Age: 71
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think he is saying maybe if Kaman had UT's resources and political clout they might have gone further. Although the seaspite is not a good advert for them.

The Westland whirl tower used to be very close to the Rugby pitches at the Garrett end of the factory , I used to wonder how much damage would have been caused if one of the blades let go during test.
widgeon is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2009, 15:16
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ct Upon Housatonic
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps this is explained by the fact that these SAC test pilots spend their time testing Kaman products once SAC has snapped them together with GE engines other sundries in Sratford prior to shipment to the various chop shops for customization?

http://www.kamanaero.com/images/PDFs...y-Sign-MOA.pdf

Though I believe that some blades, aside from those built by a certain Chinese-owned outsourcing house, are still made in Stratford.
NonSAC is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2009, 17:01
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: foot of a mountain
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Graviman, go onto the eurocopter.com website and select the Rotor Magazine option there somewhere. Funnily enough they have an article on the 135, Bk and 145 having been tested with photos and reports in the magazine. Very interesting. You should also be able to track the history and info via the Rotor Magazine link.
victor papa is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2009, 11:54
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VP,

Do you remember which issue? Search seems to be limited:

issue 82 - Eurocopter, an EADS company

MrDrumpy,

Interesting article but i'm not sure the presenter fully understood the benefits of active vibration flaps. Spreading out the tip vortices (like the owl) will help to reduce speeds near the tip of a fixed wing, but the sound from this is already minimal, but the only way i can see it impacting a helicopter is blade-vortex interaction. The main benefit of active servo flaps is to reduce blade vibration, hence structural loads into the fuselage. But having better controlled blade tips may inturn reduce the peak vorticity strength to nearer the mean vorticity strength around the azimuth. More controlled tip vortices and reduced fuselage vibration may both explain the significant 6dB(A-weighted) which was mentioned.

Dave,

How did that servo flap system work? It looks to me as if designed to damp out vibration by having it's CG ahead of the blade, so that the return to TPP restoring force is reduced by the servo Rel_AOA. At about 2/3rds radius i imagine it worked best at 3P blade vibration, but probably also handled 1P and 5P vibrations.

Last edited by Graviman; 18th Sep 2009 at 17:18. Reason: To make text clearerer (i hope). Please moan otherwise. :)
Graviman is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2009, 15:12
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: foot of a mountain
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's the latest issue. It is not a main article so look under all the listed catagories on the top of the rotor website-it is under one of them.
victor papa is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2009, 16:47
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VP, thanks:

Green helicopter: Almost a Reality

Shows the tip servos nicely. You can also see the reflex aerofoil section to keep the control forces down. Not sure exactly what is in the hub mounted cylinder. If it is just power electronics then that is some serious cooling!

Graviman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.