Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

New home for the Surrey Police ASU: RAF ODIHAM?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

New home for the Surrey Police ASU: RAF ODIHAM?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jul 2009, 08:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New home for the Surrey Police ASU: RAF ODIHAM?

I've been reliably informed by a very good sourse the Surrey Police Air Support Unit has found a new home.

Apparantly it's RAF ODIHAM in North Hampshire?

I can understand their reason for choosing a location with such tight security, due to the aircraft beeing damaged recently at Fairoaks, but from an operational point of view - how will this affect their flying times in relation to responding to incidents to the eastern side of the county such as Tandridge, which borders south/south east London and west Kent.

Secret Service
SECRET SERVICE is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 11:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how will this affect their flying times in relation to responding to incidents to the eastern side of the county such as Tandridge
Odiham to Tandridge = 34nm, Fairoaks to Tandridge = 21nm. Thats a difference of 13nm which in a 135 would be 6 - 7 mins. Is Tandridge a hot bed of crime? The important thing is that their aircraft should be secure.
Retro Coupe is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 12:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has been reported in the press. Management think the slightly longer flight time will be offset by keeping the machine out-of-hanger more often. They also have been offered priority clearance over routine military traffic.

I think in any case the reaction time will be sooooo much quicker than compared to Fairoakes if the comparison is "servicable for flight" with "vandalised".

Cheep security, too.
John R81 is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 12:39
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Among these dark Satanic mills
Posts: 1,197
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Good thing that Odiham isn't closing any time soon...oh hang on...
TorqueOfTheDevil is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 14:34
  #5 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Any idea what was wrong with Dunsfold? Slightly S of the centre of Surrey, but a lot more central than Odious.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 14:53
  #6 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 425 Likes on 224 Posts
What physical security is in place at Dunsfold? Perhaps, in view of recent events, this the one thing they were hoping to improve upon.
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 15:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you go to Dunsfold there is the risk of being hit by a car driven by Clarkson, "The Hamster" or Captain Slow!!
Retro Coupe is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 17:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Apa, apo ndi kulikonse!
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SECRET SERVICE...

Thank heavens that the national security of our great country is dependant on you!! (only joking fella)

It is hardly striking news is it? They moved a while back - and anyone on Heathrow SVFR/LARS would hear her referring to her point of departure as Odiham.

As said, security is the key here. What can be more secure than a few SA80s and wooly alligators to keep you sane.

Bit of a drive for most of the crews though........

The most important thing is that the beancounters that run the budgets within police forces are aware that they are a great asset worth protecting - which can only be a good thing. They don't need a reason to get rid of it and put it in the "too diffcult/costly" pile.
AlanM is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 17:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a bit daft

After all the problems caused with the damage to the aircraft. What a great idea it is to publish on a public site the location of there new base.....

B.U.D.G.I.E is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 17:53
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK - The SD
Posts: 460
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Will the crews be required to abide by the FTL requirements for travelling?
serf is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 19:14
  #11 (permalink)  

There are no limits
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shrewsbury, England.
Age: 67
Posts: 505
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilots - yes, police observers - no. Travelling to and from work is adequately covered by FTL schemes.
What Limits is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 20:46
  #12 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
After all the problems caused with the damage to the aircraft. What a great idea it is to publish on a public site the location of there new base.....
Of course you are correct Budgie,
Because the people who damaged it previously cannot read newspapers, listen to radios or local townsfolk. Their ability to operate a radio capable of listening to ATC is of course again very limited. Then again for them to write a letter under FOI to the Surrey Police Air Operations Unit itself and ask where it is now based would be totally inconceivable.


Failing everything else, these people, assuming they could operate a computer connected to the internet and then actually get onto the interweb, could always go to the Surrey Police website and read about it there.
Surrey Police helicopter moves to new base


So remind me Budge, what's your point?
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2009, 00:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 3nm SE of TNT, UK
Posts: 472
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
'Tis a pity then, that there's no RAF Birmingham
Fortyodd2 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2009, 07:36
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There would be if Ryanair were running the show but it would still be Odiham.
fkelly is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2009, 08:16
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bury St. Edmunds
Age: 64
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope that the RAF is properly charging the Surrey Police/Home Office for fuel, hangarage, landing fees, navigation charges and security.


I know that at the end of the day it's all taxpayers' money but any income generated will be much appreciated by the MOD, whose coffers are well and truely empty!

MB
Madbob is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.