PPL (H) at Redhill, Surrey, UK - Help please!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PPL (H) at Redhill, Surrey, UK - Help please!
Hi all,
I want to start a PPL H at my local airfield, Redhill, Surrey, UK. There are several training providers there with R22/44 on offer.
Is it daft to start on the R44 ab initio? Ultimately, I will not be flying commercially, but privately, but have no idea on what type.
Any views or recommendations (other than ensure the operator is solvent)?
many thanks
James
I want to start a PPL H at my local airfield, Redhill, Surrey, UK. There are several training providers there with R22/44 on offer.
Is it daft to start on the R44 ab initio? Ultimately, I will not be flying commercially, but privately, but have no idea on what type.
Any views or recommendations (other than ensure the operator is solvent)?
many thanks
James
Hovering AND talking
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is it daft to start on the R44 ab initio?
And don't pay up front - just pay for lessons as you take them.Cheers
Whirls
Hey Swiss CHeese
I started PPL H on the 44 and briefly switching to the 22 and its great. According to an article in Vertimag the other year, when there was a special on training and it said that having the 44 as a training type can be advantageous to one's CV when showing it to employers.
I prefer the 44 any day and will be returning to the type to finish off my training.
I started PPL H on the 44 and briefly switching to the 22 and its great. According to an article in Vertimag the other year, when there was a special on training and it said that having the 44 as a training type can be advantageous to one's CV when showing it to employers.
I prefer the 44 any day and will be returning to the type to finish off my training.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Either LHC or EBG will be able to provide you with a PPL course on the R44. Each has there only good/bad points. I suggest that you visit each and chat to instructors/customers and find which one appeals to you.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wilts
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm doing my training in the R22 at the moment and plan to do my R44 conversion soon after finishing.
I'd say that if you can afford to train in the R44 then it seems like a good choice, in my opinion safety and reliability being a bit above that of the R22 (but thats a whole other argument!)
I decided I may actually want to fly the R22 sometimes, for example when on my own or just with one passenger. It seemed silly to pay that much extra for a 4 seater if I'm going to be flying on my own.
Probably doesn't make things any clearer for you but just my two cents!
I'd say that if you can afford to train in the R44 then it seems like a good choice, in my opinion safety and reliability being a bit above that of the R22 (but thats a whole other argument!)
I decided I may actually want to fly the R22 sometimes, for example when on my own or just with one passenger. It seemed silly to pay that much extra for a 4 seater if I'm going to be flying on my own.
Probably doesn't make things any clearer for you but just my two cents!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EBG
Had a trial lesson with EBG min January (R22). Perfectly pleasent people .
Unfortunately I can't afford to go any further than the initial lesson (yet).
As mentioned above EBG have Robbo 22s & a 44. There is also a Gazelle...
.Unfortunately I can't afford to go any further than the initial lesson (yet).
As mentioned above EBG have Robbo 22s & a 44. There is also a Gazelle...
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: England
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would say if you can afford to do it all on a R44 then do, if money for flying is not a problem you'll just get spoilt by the R44 and wont want to fly the R22 anyway.
Smoother, faster and safer...... I fly both so not putting the R22 down, but I fly that for cost as much as anything, i'm only saying IF you can afford it go for the R44.
Check out the 300 too, as If I'd of had the money to even think about doing the course on a 44, I would personally of looked at the 300, Alot of people would probably tell you the same.
And if there's only 2 of you and want to potter about your local airspace I think a 300 would be better.
Just my opinion, and for the record I love the Robbies!
Smoother, faster and safer...... I fly both so not putting the R22 down, but I fly that for cost as much as anything, i'm only saying IF you can afford it go for the R44.
Check out the 300 too, as If I'd of had the money to even think about doing the course on a 44, I would personally of looked at the 300, Alot of people would probably tell you the same.
And if there's only 2 of you and want to potter about your local airspace I think a 300 would be better.
Just my opinion, and for the record I love the Robbies!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dear Swiss Cheese
Depending on how much moey you want to spend, but there is absoluteley no reason why you should fly R44 for a full ppl syllabus. It is just to spend more money than you need to spend. R22 is a perfectly good trainer. When you have your ppl in hand you can get a typerating on R44 and have more money left to keep yourself current.
Conversion from R22 to R44 is very easy. I am type rated on both types in addition to 8 other types.
By the way I can higly recommend London Helicopter Centres. I did my instructors rating with LHC many years ago. and they will look after you.
Depending on how much moey you want to spend, but there is absoluteley no reason why you should fly R44 for a full ppl syllabus. It is just to spend more money than you need to spend. R22 is a perfectly good trainer. When you have your ppl in hand you can get a typerating on R44 and have more money left to keep yourself current.
Conversion from R22 to R44 is very easy. I am type rated on both types in addition to 8 other types.
By the way I can higly recommend London Helicopter Centres. I did my instructors rating with LHC many years ago. and they will look after you.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in a skip
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chopper 2004
Whilst it's permissible to train for an additional type rating during the initial PPL training, you need to ensure that you fulfil the minimum requirements for the initial licence issue on one type. This will be 25hrs dual and 10 hours solo including the qualifying cross country flight. Be careful how you 'mix and match'.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Swiss Cheese,
Following on from The Beater, I think it's best to stick to one type all the way through. There are enough numbers/ limits/ power settings to get your head around without mixing in another type as well.
The R22 will teach you plenty about limited power and low RRPM etc so that when you progress onto something else later you'll have a greater respect for the machine.
Most importantly - enjoy it (but your wallet will take a beating !!)
DTP
Following on from The Beater, I think it's best to stick to one type all the way through. There are enough numbers/ limits/ power settings to get your head around without mixing in another type as well.
The R22 will teach you plenty about limited power and low RRPM etc so that when you progress onto something else later you'll have a greater respect for the machine.
Most importantly - enjoy it (but your wallet will take a beating !!)
DTP
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As Whirlygig said, do not be tempted to pay up front for your lessons.
Whilst the school may offer a discount, do not look at this as any different to making them a commercial loan. Do you know their business plan and accounts well enough to make them a loan ? Probably not. Don't mistake a warm welcome and excellent instrution for excellent business management. There have been too many stories in this forum from people trying to get money back from schools that have closed and I expect that we will see more of the same this year given the climate. (Please note that I do not mean to point these comments at any of the schools at Redhill or anywhere else. This is a general observation.)
Enjoy your PPL training and try to have a flight or two in some of the other helicopters that are at Redhill whilst you can. When I last looked (a year or so ago) there was access to a Gazelle, H500, and Aluette. All great for a taste of life after winning the lottery !
Whilst the school may offer a discount, do not look at this as any different to making them a commercial loan. Do you know their business plan and accounts well enough to make them a loan ? Probably not. Don't mistake a warm welcome and excellent instrution for excellent business management. There have been too many stories in this forum from people trying to get money back from schools that have closed and I expect that we will see more of the same this year given the climate. (Please note that I do not mean to point these comments at any of the schools at Redhill or anywhere else. This is a general observation.)
Enjoy your PPL training and try to have a flight or two in some of the other helicopters that are at Redhill whilst you can. When I last looked (a year or so ago) there was access to a Gazelle, H500, and Aluette. All great for a taste of life after winning the lottery !
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From my experience
Out of interest for you most of our PPL (H) training is now done directly on the R44, we have 7 of them, but only 1 R22, which shows how the market is going:
The budget isn't as far apart as you might think.
The R22 will take you more hours to learn to fly, it's not as stable as the R44, nor has the power, speed and range of the R44. Then after doing your PPL (H) you'll want to do the R44 Type Rating. That's another 5 hours flight training (minimum!), ground exam, flight test, exam fees, CAA licencing fees.........
Add it all up and you'll find that starting from scratch in the R44 will only be a few pounds per hour more.
Like "Dump the pole", I don't recommend doing both types during your PPL(H), you have to remember 2 sets of figures, do 2 flight tests and will end up doing more hours in both the R22 and R44 just for the PPL(H) anyway.
sloanemallorca
The budget isn't as far apart as you might think.
The R22 will take you more hours to learn to fly, it's not as stable as the R44, nor has the power, speed and range of the R44. Then after doing your PPL (H) you'll want to do the R44 Type Rating. That's another 5 hours flight training (minimum!), ground exam, flight test, exam fees, CAA licencing fees.........
Add it all up and you'll find that starting from scratch in the R44 will only be a few pounds per hour more.
Like "Dump the pole", I don't recommend doing both types during your PPL(H), you have to remember 2 sets of figures, do 2 flight tests and will end up doing more hours in both the R22 and R44 just for the PPL(H) anyway.
sloanemallorca
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SE England
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My two penn'orth would be a thumbs-up for LHC having trained and flown with them for some years. They have a tidy, well-maintained fleet and friendly, experienced instructors who are very safety conscious. There is also a bit of a social scene picking up (curry tonight...).
As far as R22 versus R44, they will train you on either and you will perhaps have to be guided by your budget. I'm told that if you can fly the R22 well then you can fly anything, but there is no doubt it is a more difficult beast to tame than the '44. Only you know what you plan to do once your have your licence and I guess that has to be your deciding factor.
Good luck and enjoy, whatever your decision.
for LHC having trained and flown with them for some years. They have a tidy, well-maintained fleet and friendly, experienced instructors who are very safety conscious. There is also a bit of a social scene picking up (curry tonight...).As far as R22 versus R44, they will train you on either and you will perhaps have to be guided by your budget. I'm told that if you can fly the R22 well then you can fly anything, but there is no doubt it is a more difficult beast to tame than the '44. Only you know what you plan to do once your have your licence and I guess that has to be your deciding factor.
Good luck and enjoy, whatever your decision.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Close to the hangar, UK.
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would agree with slonemallorca.
One of the reasons for flying the 44 is because it carries more people. You don't want to be on your 7th or 8th hour of flying it, with 3 loved ones onboard and be confronted with something you're not too familiar with.
In your early hours I'd say it's best to stick with one machine and get to know it well.
FB
One of the reasons for flying the 44 is because it carries more people. You don't want to be on your 7th or 8th hour of flying it, with 3 loved ones onboard and be confronted with something you're not too familiar with.
In your early hours I'd say it's best to stick with one machine and get to know it well.
FB
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Land of damp and drizzle
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At least consider what you're planning to do with your PPL when you get it; if you plan to buy yourself a 44, then obviously doing the training in a 44 is the best option. If you want to get your CPL, then the 22 represents the lowest cost way of getting there, and is probably the aircraft you'll end up doing the CPL training in anyway.
To all the folks who say there isn't much difference in cost between doing a PPL in a 44 vs. doing it in a 22 - please post some figures! To my simple mind, that sounds like a sales pitch. My reasoning is as follows, based on prices from a SE England flying school (all prices include VAT):
1 hour R22 training - £292
1 hour R44 training - £424
Lets say the R44 is easier to fly, such that you get through your PPL in minimum hours, for a cost of £19080 (45 hours). Assume the same course in the R22 takes you 55 hours, for a cost of £16060. Thus even with an extra 10 hours of dual in the R22, you're still saving £3k - a saving of roughly 16%. To put this another way, assuming it takes you an extra 10 hours of training to achieve your PPL in an R22, you'll still be able to hire and fly for an extra 13 hours after your training is complete (assuming an SFH rate of £230/hr wet) for the same cost as the basic 45 hours in an R44.
Now sure, the numbers will vary a bit depending on exactly where you go, but unless someone is running a special deal or something, the R44 and R22 prices should scale together.
As I said above, choosing which aircraft to train in should be based on your requirements; if cost is a factor, from a selection of R22, R44, 300C, it pretty much has to be an R22, all things being equal.
To all the folks who say there isn't much difference in cost between doing a PPL in a 44 vs. doing it in a 22 - please post some figures! To my simple mind, that sounds like a sales pitch. My reasoning is as follows, based on prices from a SE England flying school (all prices include VAT):
1 hour R22 training - £292
1 hour R44 training - £424
Lets say the R44 is easier to fly, such that you get through your PPL in minimum hours, for a cost of £19080 (45 hours). Assume the same course in the R22 takes you 55 hours, for a cost of £16060. Thus even with an extra 10 hours of dual in the R22, you're still saving £3k - a saving of roughly 16%. To put this another way, assuming it takes you an extra 10 hours of training to achieve your PPL in an R22, you'll still be able to hire and fly for an extra 13 hours after your training is complete (assuming an SFH rate of £230/hr wet) for the same cost as the basic 45 hours in an R44.
Now sure, the numbers will vary a bit depending on exactly where you go, but unless someone is running a special deal or something, the R44 and R22 prices should scale together.
As I said above, choosing which aircraft to train in should be based on your requirements; if cost is a factor, from a selection of R22, R44, 300C, it pretty much has to be an R22, all things being equal.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sloane,
Be fair, in the UK he gap is quite sizeable.
Assuming a 50 hr ppl student and only considering the flying.
R22 p/hr roughly £245+
R44 p/hr roughly £395+
R22 price without vat = £12250
R44 price without vat = £19750
That 'small price difference' is £7500 (or nearly 19 hours of R44 flying for the type rating if you're saying the costs are similar)
Unless of course 'your training costs R22 v R44 are significantly closer??????
If cost is an issue than an R22 is the cheapest option.
No disputing that the R44 ( particulalry the Raven II) is a far more capable machine than an R22, and IMHO a better SFH option than a B206 (unless you need the extra seat).
An R44 is a good introduction to a bigger machine and hydraulics, and given their similarities not a huge leap from an R22.
Understand where you're coming from Firebird, but didn't YOU learn on an H300 (when R44's were available) before looking at the R44??? Or are we discussing 'hindsight'
End of the day preference could well play a part. More than likely cost will be the deciding factor though
Agree Re LHC - Marcus and/or Rob can/would provide you with good training
SD
Be fair, in the UK he gap is quite sizeable.
Assuming a 50 hr ppl student and only considering the flying.
R22 p/hr roughly £245+
R44 p/hr roughly £395+
R22 price without vat = £12250
R44 price without vat = £19750
That 'small price difference' is £7500 (or nearly 19 hours of R44 flying for the type rating if you're saying the costs are similar)
Unless of course 'your training costs R22 v R44 are significantly closer??????If cost is an issue than an R22 is the cheapest option.
No disputing that the R44 ( particulalry the Raven II) is a far more capable machine than an R22, and IMHO a better SFH option than a B206 (unless you need the extra seat).
An R44 is a good introduction to a bigger machine and hydraulics, and given their similarities not a huge leap from an R22.
Understand where you're coming from Firebird, but didn't YOU learn on an H300 (when R44's were available) before looking at the R44??? Or are we discussing 'hindsight'
End of the day preference could well play a part. More than likely cost will be the deciding factor though
Agree Re LHC - Marcus and/or Rob can/would provide you with good training
SD
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My point was this - starting in the R44 is not as much a gap a people reckon.
The pilot who takes 60 hours in the R22, then goes on for the R44 Type Rating will paid in the region of 18,000 pounds (without VAT) all in.
Normally, the R44 student completes the course in less hours than in the R22.
18,000 pounds will buy you a lot of R44 flying, in fact most of the course. Yes it may cost you a few grand more, but if the R44 PPL (H) cost you 20,000 it is only 2,000 more (or 10%), (and that's without negociating a discount rate.)
The question posted was
"Is it daft to start on the R44 ab initio? Ultimately, I will not be flying commercially, but privately, but have no idea on what type."
Basically the answer is - If your learning to fly privately learning in the R44 not necessarily a bad option.................
The pilot who takes 60 hours in the R22, then goes on for the R44 Type Rating will paid in the region of 18,000 pounds (without VAT) all in.
Normally, the R44 student completes the course in less hours than in the R22.
18,000 pounds will buy you a lot of R44 flying, in fact most of the course. Yes it may cost you a few grand more, but if the R44 PPL (H) cost you 20,000 it is only 2,000 more (or 10%), (and that's without negociating a discount rate.)
The question posted was
"Is it daft to start on the R44 ab initio? Ultimately, I will not be flying commercially, but privately, but have no idea on what type."
Basically the answer is - If your learning to fly privately learning in the R44 not necessarily a bad option.................
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Close to the hangar, UK.
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SD. I did indeed learn on the 300 (too 'broad' to fly the death egg). The advantage I found in the 300 is learning throttle control and trimming.
Since getting my 44 rating I've never flown the 300 again even in the 3 years between getting my PPL and buying my 44. And that's my point, once you've got your PPL you probably want to fly something bigger, faster and with a better range - the 44.
However, if cost is the absolute decider (and it often is) the 22's the winner.
Given that most PPLs do far less hours once they've got their license than when studying for it, flying a machine that you feel at home with because it's all you've ever flown has a lot to be said for it.
Since getting my 44 rating I've never flown the 300 again even in the 3 years between getting my PPL and buying my 44. And that's my point, once you've got your PPL you probably want to fly something bigger, faster and with a better range - the 44.
However, if cost is the absolute decider (and it often is) the 22's the winner.
Given that most PPLs do far less hours once they've got their license than when studying for it, flying a machine that you feel at home with because it's all you've ever flown has a lot to be said for it.
Last edited by firebird_uk; 18th Feb 2009 at 17:51. Reason: Spelling
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: the right seat
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can I be the one foolish enough to open the Datcon debate? Yes the 44 costs more, and I cannot comment on if you will get your PPL quicker in the 44, but as the Datcon in the 44 is lever up, and the 22 is rotors running, the start up and shut down in a 22 add at least 0.1 per flight. Averaged on every one hour flight (which many lessons won't be), then 10% for start up/shutdown takes the earlier poster's 55 hours to over 60. So the £16060 calculation may be nearer £17800, quite close to the £19080 45 hour figure quoted.
Just something to consider.
Just something to consider.