Robinson vs Turbine
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: NZ Southern Alps
Hey Scissor,
You're clearly and even-keeled gent. Many a subscriber would have launched their own salvo in return. Good for you.
It's horses for courses, I think . . . buy the thing that suits your circumstances best.
I have to say, though, that dual bench front seat in a 350 or 355 is wonderful . . . but caution any errant passenger loader who doesn't put the 'hottie' next to me!!!
GP
You're clearly and even-keeled gent. Many a subscriber would have launched their own salvo in return. Good for you.
It's horses for courses, I think . . . buy the thing that suits your circumstances best.
I have to say, though, that dual bench front seat in a 350 or 355 is wonderful . . . but caution any errant passenger loader who doesn't put the 'hottie' next to me!!!
GP
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: UK, US, now more ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
oh yeah didnt count the drivers seat...if one pax is a hottie you can take 8 as she can sit on the pilots lap
I fully agree with Gas Producer......hotties ALWAYS next to the pilot. It's a CofG thing.
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: USA
R44 re Turbine
I've flown both and I would much prefer flying a $5M dollar turbine than an R44. The R44 is to me adversely affected by any sort of wind or turbulence. It can be very uncomfortable on occasions. Having said that I think the R44 is very good for the money and is very cheap to run. Horses for courses really.
Chopperpilot 47
Chopperpilot 47
