Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helicopters based on boats

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helicopters based on boats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jan 2009, 06:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: airport
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helicopters based on boats

Just out of curiosity I asked myself about regulations and real world practices for helicopters based on boats.

Say a rich dude cruises around the world on his yacht with helipad and helicopter. In many countries, off-airport landings are not permitted (most of Europe?) or some countries don't have any civil/private helicopters flying at all (ie. Thailand, just to stay with places where a yacht would go usually).

Can they still fly locally (ie. from the boat to airport, or boat to boat etc), are there usually special regulations, or is this a gray area and as long as it's a country without dictator and/or death penalty people just take their chances?

A whole different story is probably the corrosion issue with a helicopter so close to the salty soup all year long.

PS: Just saw some great pictures of a guy who flew out of a luxury yacht for a year when he was building time.
Runway101 is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2009, 13:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Aus, Europe & everywhere in between
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Runway

Approvals needed for each place you go to. This takes up most of the pilot's time. Most of the European countries are very good and are used to helicopters based on ships.

You specifically mentioned Thailand. For me, the most difficult place to get an approval to operate to and from the ship.

Salt/corrosion problems are a real threat and washing, washing and more washing is required.

$$ are good but alot of waiting around.
Oogle is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2009, 22:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As SASless would point very little approval is required if you are on the N reg

RIP

************************************************************ ********************
** Report created 1/2/2009 Record 1 **
************************************************************ ********************

IDENTIFICATION
Regis#: 104BN Make/Model: H369 Description: MD369, MD-500, MD-530F/MG, LIFTER, DEFEN
Date: 12/27/2008 Time: 2200

Event Type: Accident Highest Injury: Fatal Mid Air: N Missing: N
Damage: Substantial

LOCATION

DESCRIPTION
N104BN, A HUGHES 369A ROTORCRAFT CRASHED IN THE OCEAN AFTER DEPARTING FROM
A FISHING VESSEL, THERE WERE TWO PERSONS ON BOARD, ONE WAS FATALLY INJURED
AND ONE SUSTAINED SERIOUS INJURIES, 350 MILES WEST OF HONIARA, SOLOMON
ISLANDS

INJURY DATA Total Fatal: 1
# Crew: 2 Fat: 1 Ser: 1 Min: 0 Unk:
# Pass: 0 Fat: 0 Ser: 0 Min: 0 Unk:
# Grnd: Fat: 0 Ser: 0 Min: 0 Unk:

WEATHER: NOT REPORTED

OTHER DATA
Activity: Unknown Phase: Unknown Operation: OTHER


FAA FSDO: SAN FRANCISCO, CA (WP03) Entry date: 12/29/2008
zalt is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 09:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On the move...
Age: 58
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tuna or Luxury

Zalt was this a tuna spotting collision or a luxury yacht?
Not many MD500's on luxury boats!
Being that far off land (international waters??) then it wouldn't matter what the law of the closest land was...

Last edited by CYHeli; 3rd Jan 2009 at 09:06. Reason: finishing sentence
CYHeli is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 10:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,276
Received 338 Likes on 190 Posts
......AFTER DEPARTING FROM
A FISHING VESSEL...
I'll give you 3 guesses........
212man is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 11:20
  #6 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,578
Received 435 Likes on 229 Posts
Luxury trawler?
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 02:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,850
Received 57 Likes on 38 Posts
Sometimes..................!!

RVDT is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 04:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Where I'm pointing...
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RVDT, you'd think they would at least have the courtesy to put a regulation olympic length pool on that tub.
birrddog is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 09:59
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The MCA in UK has this:
http://www.mcga.gov.uk/c4mca/msn_1792_edition_2.pdf
pp
peterperfect is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 10:38
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: airport
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by peterperfect
This Annex does not address helicopter flight operations in any detail. It is intended
as a technical standard for the landing area and associated on-board helicopter
facilities. The helicopter pilot / operator is responsible for ensuring that the
requirements of the Administration with which the helicopter is registered and the
requirements of the Administration responsible for the airspace in which the helicopter
is operating are complied with in full. The Aviation Inspection Body may provide
further guidance.
Runway101 is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 13:02
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,850
Received 57 Likes on 38 Posts
Runway,

Are you really asking yourself out of curiosity or just (excuse me) phishing for some answers to avoid paying for them. Some people make a business out of this game you know.

Who do you think wrote Annex 6 to the MCA document? It was basically a panel of "experts" being ex-mil people and others.

Unfortunately, yachts are under no pressure to operate in all weather or at all times. So they probably don't need a North Sea helipad. (And I'll show you a good looking oil rig that is owned personally.)

The Catch 22 is, that these regulations are based on COMMERCIAL operations of the vessel.

For various reasons, too many to bring up here, some owners hire the boat to themselves (think about it) which makes it a commercial operation. If not it is private and none of these regulations apply, yet it might not be a prudent way to build a yacht when you consider that one day you will sell it.

There are a plethora of "consultants" out there that are happy to insulate yacht owners from reality and some of their readies. No doubt they will bound into this thread shortly with their anonymous "recommendations."

It is an unfortunate fact that because of the vessels registry it has to comply with "flag" rules. This compliance is to keep insurance underwriters happy. Depending on the colour of the flag these can be different.

Flying of the aircraft in different countries normally does not require any more permission than any other aircraft. It is the use of the deck and where it may happen to be at the time.

Most regulations involving the permission to use the deck have various reasons behind them but it would appear that the helicopter is a threat to it's own versatility. Customs and border authorities are the ones that twitch!

Last edited by RVDT; 4th Jan 2009 at 13:21.
RVDT is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 15:57
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: airport
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RVDT, indeed I asked myself out of curiosity and Oogle basically already gave me the answer with his reply...

The closest I personally come to yachts is overflying them at 1000 feet or looking at them from the shore.
Runway101 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.