Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Rotor Revs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st December 2008 | 19:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: On the Rump of Pendle Hill GB
Rotor Revs

Good evening Ppruners

It seems that every spec I read indicates that main rotors nearly all operate in the 400 to 450 RPM, Why? is this a speed range worked out on Strength to weight ratio's or kinetics or what, ... why not higher would a higher rev range give or offer greater safety in EOL situations,.. or is it down to size of main shaft governs highest rev limits, therfore higher revs = heavier kit ?

Peter R-B
Vfr
VfrpilotPB/2 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st December 2008 | 19:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: uk
tip speed how many sonic booms would you like
CRAZYBROADSWORD is offline  
Reply
Old 1st December 2008 | 20:15
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Scandinavia
Not revs, speed!

This has been mentioned before in other threads, but it is all about the speed of the blade (-tip), so a smaller diameter rotor will turn faster than a larger. I think the tip speed is usually somewhere around 400-430KTS. With my manuals at home the number stand to be corrected. The rotor tip airspeed will then of course vary with the helicopters speed through the air x 2.

Two problems with the rotor speed: To slow -> retreating bladestall, to fast -> compression problems due to getting close to speed of sound.

Hmm, when I come to think of it, the rotor rpm is almost always the same no matter the size of helicopter: 100-105%

/2beers
2beers is offline  
Reply
Old 1st December 2008 | 20:38
  #4 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Tip speed governs max Nr, as already stated.

The aircraft I trained on (Whirlwind 10, three long, spindly blades and a single Gnome turbine) had a normal Nr of 210 rpm (I think, it was three decades ago) and just 190 rpm / 80 kts (more certain of that) for a range auto. At 190 rpm you could see the individual blades passing.
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 1st December 2008 | 22:20
  #5 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 636
From: Great South East, tired and retired
2beers,
It's not airspeed x 2, it is + or - the airspeed.

Another factor in RRPM is having to make the hub and grips stronger to cope with the centripetal force. Double the RPM, four times the force.

Huey blades are at 324 RPM, I think the R22 is about 430 or so.
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Reply
Old 1st December 2008 | 23:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: SW Asia
The reason for rotor rpm is to make the blades have enough airspeed, obviously. The max rpm is selected to make the blade tips (the fastest part) move at about 700 feet per second. This allows them to make lots of lift in a hover, but also avoid transonic speeds at cruise. Most rotors spin so that the blade tips hover at 675 to 725 feet per second.

This is why the rpm is higher for smaller radius helicopters - with less radius, it takes more rpm to make the needed tip speed.
ramen noodles is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd December 2008 | 01:29
  #7 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
Community Builder
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 7,081
Likes: 2,938
From: Ontario, Canada
If you watch the huge Russian MIL helicopters, the rotor turns so slowly, you can actually count the rotations.
Pilot DAR is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd December 2008 | 05:50
  #8 (permalink)  

Combine Operations
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: U.K.
2beers,
It's not airspeed x 2, it is + or - the airspeed.
It's x 2, Ascend. The advancing blade speed increases by the airspeed, the retreating blade speed decreases by the airspeed.
Farmer 1 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd December 2008 | 15:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 3
From: Philadelphia PA
The MI-26, being the largest helicopter currently in operation, has a rotor RPM of 80 RPM.
I commented to the Russian pilot who flew with me that it should be in RPD (Revolutions per Day).
Shawn Coyle is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd December 2008 | 18:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Port Townsend,WA. USA
So, in theory, an infinitely large rotor would have an rpm of zero!
slowrotor is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd December 2008 | 22:25
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: tipton
Yes, its called a "fixed wing"
D
whyisitsohard is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd December 2008 | 23:14
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 66
Likes: 1
From: Sarver PA USA 40.711 N X 79.7749 W
Exclamation

THIS gem got close to that.....................

Hughes XH-17 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RJ
RJ Kanary is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2008 | 01:42
  #13 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 636
From: Great South East, tired and retired
Ah, farmer, it's in the terminology. The blade has its airflow from rotation, then as the machine moves forward at a certain airspeed, the blade tip then sees rotation+airspeed on the advancing side, and rotation-airspeed on the retreating side. The difference between them is definitely 2 x airspeed, but the blade tip never sees rotation+2xairspeed.
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2008 | 06:54
  #14 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: midcoast US
"It seems that every spec I read indicates that main rotors nearly all operate in the 400 to 450 RPM"

They differ quite a bit, actually. The local Guard base operates Chinooks, which I can hear coming well before seeing them. I can follow the blades going roundy-round, because they're relatively slow, being a large disk. The R22 disk turns at 530 RPM (104%), which gives 672 FPS tip-speed, or about 398 knots. That's right in line with ramen's comment "blade tips hover at 675 to 725 feet per second." and 2 Beers "the tip speed is usually somewhere around 400-430KTS".

What I don't understand is how some ships can have such high max airspeeds without getting RBS. Are their rotors turning so fast that the tips are barely subsonic, or what?

rf
rotorfan is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2008 | 09:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: SW Asia
rotorfan asked:
What I don't understand is how some ships can have such high max airspeeds without getting RBS. Are their rotors turning so fast that the tips are barely subsonic, or what?

The real factors are tip speed and rotor blade total area. The faster the blades, the more lift at high speed, and the wider the blades, the less angle of attack needed for the retreating blade to do its job. So high speed is gained by having more, wider and faster blades. The number of blades is not terribly important, it is the total blade area as compared to the total disk area that counts.

The problem is that more, faster, wider blades actually reduces hover performance, and the rotor system also weighs more with all that heavy blade area spinning around. For these reasons, high speed is a tradeoff against better hover payload.
ramen noodles is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2008 | 10:56
  #16 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
There is a limiting relationship between tip speed and forward airspeed for helicopters where one is divided by the other and the limit is 0.5. I can't remember the exact name for it as I don't have access to my notes down here but the faster the forward (fuselage speed) the slower the tip speed needs to be.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2008 | 11:12
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 3
From: Philadelphia PA
Crab:
It's called 'advance ratio'.
Shawn Coyle is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2008 | 17:43
  #18 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
Thanks Shawn - it was tucked away in a dusty corner of my brain from a lecture by Simon Newman a good few years ago at Southampton University.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2008 | 19:53
  #19 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
What I don't understand is how some ships can have such high max airspeeds without getting RBS. Are their rotors turning so fast that the tips are barely subsonic, or what?
Modern blades for faster helicopters are becoming by necessity more complicated in shape. Westlands ran the "BERP" project (British Experimental Rotor Programme) in the late 70s / early 80s and came up with an "oblique spade" type of tip, which gave the tip a swept wing effect (good for high speeds) whilst minimising adverse aerodynamic blade twist/flex and without sacrificing too much performance at lower speeds. I don't think anyone these days equips a modern medium or large sized helicopter with a simple "plank" shaped blade design.
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 4th December 2008 | 12:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: FL450
All modern propeller blades have a twist to compensate for the outer element travelling faster than the inner but I have never seen such a twist in helicopter blades. Is it just a problem of construction and if so what a shame as efficiency would be improved dramatically?
Kelly Hopper is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.